Transoral Robotic-Assisted Lingual Tonsillectomy in the Pediatric Population | Minimally Invasive Surgery | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.108.182. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
1.
Hockstein  NG, O’Malley  BW  Jr, Weinstein  GS.  Assessment of intraoperative safety in transoral robotic surgery.  Laryngoscope. 2006;116(2):165-168.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Leonhardt  FD, Quon  H, Abrahão  M, O’Malley  BW  Jr, Weinstein  GS.  Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function.  Head Neck. 2012;34(2):146-154.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Mehta  V, Johnson  P, Tassler  A,  et al.  A new paradigm for the diagnosis and management of unknown primary tumors of the head and neck: a role for transoral robotic surgery.  Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):146-151.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Vicini  C, Dallan  I, Canzi  P,  et al.  Transoral robotic surgery of the tongue base in obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome: anatomic considerations and clinical experience.  Head Neck. 2012;34(1):15-22.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Weinstein  GS, O’Malley  BW  Jr, Snyder  W, Sherman  E, Quon  H.  Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(12):1220-1226.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Hurtuk  A, Teknos  T, Ozer  E.  Robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy.  Laryngoscope. 2011;121(7):1480-1482.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Rahbar  R, Ferrari  LR, Borer  JG, Peters  CA.  Robotic surgery in the pediatric airway: application and safety.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(1):46-50.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Van Abel  KM, Moore  EJ.  The rise of transoral robotic surgery in the head and neck: emerging applications.  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012;12(3):373-380.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Maturo  SC, Hartnick  CJ.  Pediatric lingual tonsillectomy.  Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;73:109-111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Ontario  HQ; Health Quality Ontario.  Polysomnography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based analysis.  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(13):1-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Mitchell  RB.  Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea in children: outcome evaluated by pre- and postoperative polysomnography.  Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1844-1854.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Maan  ZN, Gibbins  N, Al-Jabri  T, D’Souza  AR.  The use of robotics in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: a systematic review.  Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33(1):137-146.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Haus  BM, Kambham  N, Le  D, Moll  FM, Gourin  C, Terris  DJ.  Surgical robotic applications in otolaryngology.  Laryngoscope. 2003;113(7):1139-1144.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Faust  RA, Rahbar  R.  Robotic surgical technique for pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(5):1045-1051, xi.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Maan  ZN, Gibbins  N, Al-Jabri  T, D’Souza  AR.  The use of robotics in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: a systematic review.  Am J Otolaryngol. 2012;33(1):137-146.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Robicsek  F.  Robotic cardiac surgery: time told!  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135(2):243-246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
October 2013

Transoral Robotic-Assisted Lingual Tonsillectomy in the Pediatric Population

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health System, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(10):1032-1036. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4924
Abstract

Importance  Since technologic advances allow the use of robotic assistance in various surgical interventions performed to treat pediatric otolaryngology patients, the feasibility and outcomes of potential procedures must be assessed.

Objective  To assess the feasibility and outcomes of robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy in the pediatric population.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Retrospective medical record review in a tertiary care children’s hospital of 16 pediatric patients who underwent robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy from March 1, 2011, through December 31, 2012.

Intervention  All patients underwent robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy using the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc) at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Demographic data, comorbidities, robot docking time, operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative course, including complications in the immediate and longer-term postoperative period, were collected and analyzed.

Results  All patients successfully underwent lingual tonsillectomy using the da Vinci Surgical System. Endotracheal intubation was performed in all patients and did not interfere with visualization of the oropharynx. Optimal retraction allowed visualization of pertinent structures and maximized transoral access. A significant learning curve from the first 5 surgical cases to subsequent cases with respect to robot docking time was observed (9 vs 3 minutes, respectively; P < .05). Operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative complication profiles are within the expected and acceptable limitations for performing lingual tonsillectomy in the pediatric population.

Conclusions and Relevance  Technologic advances have allowed miniaturization of robotic instrumentation and have expanded the scope of surgical options for the pediatric airway. Robotic-assisted lingual tonsillectomy is well tolerated and can be performed in the pediatric population with excellent success. It should be considered a feasible option for implementation at an institution-based level.

×