Relationship Between Tympanic Membrane Perforations and Retained Ventilation Tubes | Otolaryngology | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Armstrong  BW A new treatment for chronic secretory otitis media.  Arch Otolaryngol. 1954;59653- 654Google ScholarCrossref
Levine  SDaly  KGiebink  GS Tympanic membrane perforations and tympanostomy tubes.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1994;16327- 30Google Scholar
Dunlap  AMSchuknecht  HF Closure of perforations of the tympanic membrane.  Laryngoscope. 1947;57479- 490Google ScholarCrossref
Juers  AL Office closure of tympanic membrane perforations: a new approach.  Laryngoscope. 1958;681207- 1215Google ScholarCrossref
Luxford  WMSheehy  JL Myringotomy and ventilation tubes: a report of 1,568 ears.  Laryngoscope. 1982;921293- 1297Google ScholarCrossref
McClelland  C Incidence of complications from use of tympanostomy tubes.  Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;10697- 99Google ScholarCrossref
Solomon  PRLax  MJSmitheringale  AJ Tympanic membrane perforation following ventilation tube removal in a pediatric setting: a historical study.  J Otolaryngol. 1993;2248- 49Google Scholar
Courteney-Harris  RGFord  GRGaniwalla  TMJMangat  KS Closure of tympanic membrane perforation after the removal of Goode-type tympanostomy tubes: the use of Silastic sheeting.  J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106960- 962Google ScholarCrossref
Hekkenberg  RJSmitheringale  AJ Gelfoam/Gelfilm patching following the removal of ventilation tubes.  J Otolaryngol. 1995;24362- 363Google Scholar
Baldwin  RLLoftin  L Gelfilm myringoplasty: a technique for residual perforations.  Laryngoscope. 1992;102340- 342Google ScholarCrossref
Pribitkin  EAHandler  SDTom  LWCPotsic  WPWetmore  RF Ventilation tube removal: indications for paper patch myringoplasty.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118495- 497Google ScholarCrossref
Original Article
April 1998

Relationship Between Tympanic Membrane Perforations and Retained Ventilation Tubes

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Nichols and Ramadan), West Virginia University (Dr Santrock), Morgantown, and State University of New York at Buffalo (Dr Wax).

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(4):417-419. doi:10.1001/archotol.124.4.417

Objectives  To determine the effects of prolonged ventilation tube retention on tympanic membrane healing and the efficacy of patching procedures used concomitantly at the time of tube removal.

Design  Retrospective chart review.

Setting  Tertiary referral academic institution.

Patients  Seventy-six patients aged 12 years and younger, with a total of 99 ears identified from January 1989 to December 1994. All patients underwent ventilation tube removal for prolonged tube retention or infection unresponsive to medical management. A minimum of 6 months of follow-up was required for inclusion.

Intervention  Ventilation tube removal under general anesthesia, with or without concomitant patching.

Outcome Measures  All medical charts were reviewed for age, sex, indications for tube removal, tube retention time, type of patch used (if any), type of tube, outcome after removal, other medical problems, and previous surgical history.

Results  The perforation rate was significantly higher in children with tubes retained beyond 36 months (P=.02). History of previous adenoidectomy predicted poor outcome, with a rate of 47% vs 17% in patients with no such history (P=.002). Patching did not improve healing. No other patient factors significantly influenced the perforation rate.

Conclusions  Ventilation tube retention longer than 36 months resulted in an increased perforation rate after surgical removal. Paper patching at the time of tube removal does not improve healing. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the efficacy of other patching techniques.