Adenopharyngoplasty vs Adenotonsillectomy in Children With Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Otolaryngology | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Marcus  CL, Brooks  LJ, Draper  KA,  et al; American Academy of Pediatrics.  Diagnosis and management of childhood obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.  Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):576-584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Capdevila  OS, Kheirandish-Gozal  L, Dayyat  E, Gozal  D.  Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: complications, management, and long-term outcomes.  Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(2):274-282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Marcus  CL, Moore  RH, Rosen  CL,  et al; Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT).  A randomized trial of adenotonsillectomy for childhood sleep apnea.  N Engl J Med. 2013;368(25):2366-2376.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mitchell  RB.  Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea in children: outcome evaluated by pre- and postoperative polysomnography.  Laryngoscope. 2007;117(10):1844-1854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharjee  R, Kheirandish-Gozal  L, Spruyt  K,  et al.  Adenotonsillectomy outcomes in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in children: a multicenter retrospective study.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):676-683.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tauman  R, Gulliver  TE, Krishna  J,  et al.  Persistence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children after adenotonsillectomy.  J Pediatr. 2006;149(6):803-808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Friedman  M, Wilson  M, Lin  HC, Chang  HW.  Updated systematic review of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy for treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(6):800-808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ye  J, Liu  H, Zhang  GH,  et al.  Outcome of adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;119(8):506-513.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Imanguli  M, Ulualp  SO.  Risk factors for residual obstructive sleep apnea after adenotonsillectomy in children.  Laryngoscope. 2016;126(11):2624-2629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Costa  DJ, Mitchell  R.  Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea in obese children: a meta-analysis.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(4):455-460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Mitchell  RB, Kelly  J.  Outcome of adenotonsillectomy for severe obstructive sleep apnea in children.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004;68(11):1375-1379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg  JB, Maislin  G, Schwab  RJ.  Physical findings and the risk for obstructive sleep apnea. The importance of oropharyngeal structures.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(2 Pt 1):740-748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Schwab  RJ, Gupta  KB, Gefter  WB, Metzger  LJ, Hoffman  EA, Pack  AI.  Upper airway and soft tissue anatomy in normal subjects and patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Significance of the lateral pharyngeal walls.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(5 Pt 1):1673-1689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guilleminault  C, Li  KK, Khramtsov  A, Pelayo  R, Martinez  S.  Sleep disordered breathing: surgical outcomes in prepubertal children.  Laryngoscope. 2004;114(1):132-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Friedman  M, Samuelson  CG, Hamilton  C,  et al.  Modified adenotonsillectomy to improve cure rates for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(1):132-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Chiu  PH, Ramar  K, Chen  KC,  et al.  Can pillar suturing promote efficacy of adenotonsillectomy for pediatric OSAS? a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Laryngoscope. 2013;123(10):2573-2577.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brodsky  L.  Modern assessment of tonsils and adenoids.  Pediatr Clin North Am. 1989;36(6):1551-1569.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Berry  RB, Budhiraja  R, Gottlieb  DJ,  et al; American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.  Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events.  J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(5):597-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Borgström  A, Nerfeldt  P, Friberg  D.  Adenotonsillotomy versus adenotonsillectomy in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea: an RCT.  Pediatrics. 2017;139(4):e20163314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Borgström  A, Nerfeldt  P, Friberg  D.  Questionnaire OSA-18 has poor validity compared to polysomnography in pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(11):1864-1868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Todd  CA, Bareiss  AK, McCoul  ED, Rodriguez  KH.  Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea and quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;157(5):767-773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Baldassari  CM, Mitchell  RB, Schubert  C, Rudnick  EF.  Pediatric obstructive sleep apnea and quality of life: a meta-analysis.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;138(3):265-273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Investigation
July 2018

Adenopharyngoplasty vs Adenotonsillectomy in Children With Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Surgical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(7):580-586. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0487
Key Points

Question  Is a modified adenotonsillectomy, termed as adenopharyngoplasty, with closure of the tonsillar pillars more effective than adenotonsillectomy for treating severe obstructive sleep apnea in otherwise healthy children?

Findings  In this randomized clinical trial including 83 children with obstructive sleep apnea who were randomized to receive adenopharyngoplasty or adenotonsillectomy, the mean obstructive apnea-hypopnea index was improved in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups. There also were no significant differences between the groups regarding other polysomnography variables or quality of life.

Meaning  Adenopharyngoplasty was not more effective than adenotonsillectomy for treating severe obstructive sleep apnea in otherwise healthy children.


Importance  Adenotonsillectomy (ATE) is the primary surgical method for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children. However, children with severe OSA have an increased risk for residual OSA after ATE. Previous studies indicate that adenopharyngoplasty (APP), a modified ATE with closure of the tonsillar pillars, might improve the surgical outcome, but the overall evidence is weak.

Objective  To determine whether APP is more effective than ATE for treating severe OSA in otherwise healthy children.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at the otorhinolaryngology department at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Eighty-three children, aged 2 to 4 years, with an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) score of 10 or higher, were randomized to APP (n = 36) or ATE (n = 47). Participants were recruited from December 1, 2014, through November 31, 2016.

Interventions  Adenotonsillectomy was performed in all 83 patients in both groups by the cold steel technique. The APP group also underwent closure of the tonsillar pillars with 2 inverted sutures on each side.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in OAHI score change before and after surgery. A higher score indicates worse problems and a score of 10 or higher is defined as severe OSA. The outcome was evaluated per protocol and with intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were other polysomnography variables and the Obstructive Sleep Apnea-18 (OSA-18) questionnaire (possible total symptom score range, 18-126; higher scores indicate worse quality of life). Polysomnography was performed and the OSA-18 questionnaire was completed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

Results  A total of 83 children (49 [59%] boys; mean [SD] age, 36.6 [9.2] months) were included in the study. Of these, 74 (89%) (APP, n = 30; ATE, n = 44) completed the study. The mean (SD) preoperative OAHI score was 23.8 (11.8) for APP and 23.8 (11.5) for ATE. Both the APP and ATE groups had a significant decrease in mean OAHI score after surgery (−21.7; 95% CI, −26.3 to −17.2; and −21.1; 95% CI, −24.5 to −17.7, respectively), but there was no significant difference between the groups (0.7; 95% CI, −4.8 to 6.1). Furthermore, no significant differences between the groups were seen regarding other polysomnography variables (eg, respiratory distress index: mean, 0.6; 95% CI, −5.0 to 6.3) or the OSA-18 questionnaire (eg, total symptom score: −0.5; 95% CI, −13 to 12). One patient from each group was readmitted owing to postoperative bleeding, but no other complications were seen.

Conclusions and Relevance  This trial did not show that APP was more effective than ATE alone to treat otherwise healthy children with severe OSA. This finding suggests that ATE should continue to be the primary treatment for OSA in children.

Trial Registration Identifier: NCT02315911