A, Overall stability rate without growth. B, Overall stability rate without surgery. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of failures.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Sanabria A. Active Surveillance in Thyroid Microcarcinoma in a Latin-American Cohort. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(10):947–948. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1663
The incidence of thyroid carcinoma is growing worldwide owing to overdiagnosis.1 Japanese authors have shown that active surveillance of patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is possible.2 Some case series have recently been published in Western countries,3 but there are no reports from Latin America. The aim of this study is to report and describe a cohort of patients with thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda categories V to VI and who are under active surveillance.
This is a report of a prospective cohort from a head and neck cancer center in Medellín, Colombia. All patients were referred to the author as potential candidates for thyroidectomy. Local institutional review board authorization was provided, and written informed consent was waived due to the descriptive character of the study. All had thyroid nodules found in ultrasonographic imaging with fine-needle aspiration biopsy results classified as Bethesda categories V to VI. An active surveillance trial was proposed to patients with low-risk microcarcinoma (<1.5 cm, encapsulated, without evidence of lymph node metastasis) following Japanese and American recommendations2,3 (periodic evaluation with ultrasound, immediate consultation if clinical symptoms or lymph nodes appeared, centralized management of the disease, immediate surgery if a significant growth occurred, patient preference). Only patients who accepted the strategy are reported in this study. Data on age, sex, reason for an ultrasound examination, ultrasound risk by American Thyroid Association (ATA) classification, size of the nodule, reason to consider active surveillance and follow-up ultrasounds, and surgical decision were recorded prospectively. A Kaplan-Meier graph was built for stability of the nodule without any growth, without growth more than 3 mm, and need of operation.
A total of 57 patients were analyzed since September 2013. Mean (SD) age was 51.9 (14.5) years (range, 24-85 years). Forty-eight (84%) of the 57 patients were women, and in 55 (96%) the nodule was incidentally discovered. Mean (SD) and median nodule size was 9.7 (4.3) mm and 9 mm (range, 3-26 mm), respectively. Only 9 of 57 (16%) nodules were classified as ATA low risk, whereas 36 (61%) nodules were classified as Bethesda category V. Of the 57 patients, 14 (25%) explicitly expressed the desire for surveillance, and in 36 (63%) patients the proposal of surveillance was based on a nodule size smaller than 1 cm. The median number of follow-up visits was 2 (range, 0-6). Median follow-up was 13.3 months (range, 0-54 months). Of 57 nodules, 16 (28%) grew a mean (SD) of 2 (1.3) mm, but only 2 (3.5%) grew more than 3 mm. Five of 57 (9%) patients underwent surgery (3 owing to nodule growth and 2 for other reasons). All of them had a papillary carcinoma treated with lobectomy. The overall stability rate without growth (Figure, A), without growth more than 3 mm, and without surgery (Figure, B) at 12 months was 90%, 98%, and 92.5%, respectively.
Overdiagnosis in thyroid cancer is an important problem.4 As the number of incident cases increases, the possibility of harm related to treatment also increases. Most of the new cases are subcentimeter nodules incidentally found by an imaging test, which are biopsied and have high malignancy suspicion.1 Most of these nodules will not have any detrimental effect on survival, but today, such patients often undergo thyroidectomy. As an alternative, active surveillance protocols are safe in selected cases, avoiding the risks associated with surgery. There are studies on patients in Asia and the United States, but not in Latin America to our knowledge. Some authors have suggested that there are obstacles to surveillance, including physician responsibility (surgeons are not able to do it), physician reimbursement, and patient anxiety,5 that are frequent in developing countries, but these may be solved with education, new health policies, and training. Major barriers to implementation of surveillance of patients include home located in remote rural areas and lack of insurance, which together impede routine imaging and medical follow-up; patients’ low educational level, which impedes understanding of risks and benefits of surveillance; fear on the part of physicians of future legal actions; and resistance to change. This cohort study demonstrates that this approach is feasible in Latin America.
Corresponding Author: Alvaro Sanabria, PhD, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Cra 51d, 62-29, Medellín, Antioquia 050010, Colombia (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Accepted for Publication: May 27, 2018.
Published Online: August 30, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1663
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: The author has completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none were reported.
Create a personal account or sign in to: