Anatomic Distribution of the Morphologic Variation of the Upper Lip Frenulum Among Healthy Newborns | Child Development | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.173.234.169. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Kotlow  LA.  The influence of the maxillary frenum on the development and pattern of dental caries on anterior teeth in breastfeeding infants: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.  J Hum Lact. 2010;26(3):304-308. doi:10.1177/0890334410362520PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Kotlow  L.  Infant reflux and aerophagia associated with the maxillary lip-tie and ankyloglossia (tongue-tie).  Clin Lactation. 2011;2(4):25-29. doi:10.1891/215805311807011467Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Henry  SW, Levin  MP, Tsaknis  PJ.  Histologic features of the superior labial frenum.  J Periodontol. 1976;47(1):25-28. doi:10.1902/jop.1976.47.1.25PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Edwards  JG.  The diastema, the frenum, the frenectomy: a clinical study.  Am J Orthod. 1977;71(5):489-508. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(77)90001-XPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Flinck  A, Paludan  A, Matsson  L, Holm  A-K, Axelsson  I.  Oral findings in a group of newborn Swedish children.  Int J Paediatr Dent. 1994;4(2):67-73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.1994.tb00107.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Santa Maria  C, Aby  J, Truong  MT, Thakur  Y, Rea  S, Messner  A.  The superior labial frenulum in newborns: what is normal?  Glob Pediatr Health. 2017;4:X17718896. doi:10.1177/2333794X17718896PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Francis  DO, Chinnadurai  S, Morad  A,  et al. Treatments for Ankyloglossia and Ankyloglossia With Concomitant Lip-Tie: Comparative Effectiveness Reviews No. 149. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015. AHRQ Publication No. 15-EHC011-EF.
8.
Ghaheri  BA, Cole  M, Fausel  SC, Chuop  M, Mace  JC.  Breastfeeding improvement following tongue-tie and lip-tie release: a prospective cohort study.  Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1217-1223. doi:10.1002/lary.26306PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Kotlow  L.  Oral diagnosis of abnormal frenum attachments in neonates and infants: evaluation and treatment of the maxillary and lingual frenum using the erbium:YAG laser.  J Pediatr Dent Care. 2004;10(3):11-14. https://www.kiddsteeth.com/assets/pdfs/articles/finaslttfrenarticleoct2004.pdf. Accessed July 22, 2019.Google Scholar
10.
Jensen  D, Wallace  S, Kelsay  P.  LATCH: a breastfeeding charting system and documentation tool.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1994;23(1):27-32. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1994.tb01847.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Cohen  J.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. London, England: Routledge; 1988.
12.
Ellis  PD.  The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
13.
Sowjanya  SVNS, Venugopalan  L.  LATCH score as a predictor of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 weeks postpartum: a prospective cohort study.  Breastfeed Med. 2018;13(6):444-449. doi:10.1089/bfm.2017.0142PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Kotlow  LA.  Diagnosing and understanding the maxillary lip-tie (superior labial, the maxillary labial frenum) as it relates to breastfeeding.  J Hum Lact. 2013;29(4):458-464. doi:10.1177/0890334413491325PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Ceremello  PJ.  The superior labial frenum and the midline diastema and their relation to growth and development of the oral structures.  Am J Orthod. 1953;39(2):120-139. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(53)90016-5Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Boutsi  EA, Tatakis  DN.  Maxillary labial frenum attachment in children.  Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21(4):284-288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01121.xPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Francis  DO, Krishnaswami  S, McPheeters  M.  Treatment of ankyloglossia and breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review.  Pediatrics. 2015;135(6):e1458-e1466. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-0658PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
August 22, 2019

Anatomic Distribution of the Morphologic Variation of the Upper Lip Frenulum Among Healthy Newborns

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 2Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(10):931-938. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2019.2302
Key Points

Question  What is the anatomic distribution of the maxillary labial frenulum among newborns, and which anatomic measurements could be useful to create a classification system to advance research investigating this structure?

Findings  This cross-sectional study of 150 healthy newborns found that the maxillary labial frenulum had numerous morphologic components with varying distributions. Several components having means and SDs with broad distributions were helpful in differentiating degrees of lip tethering, including alveolar edge to frenulum gingival attachment; frenulum length of stretch; frenulum gingival attachment thickness; frenulum labial attachment thickness; and the percentage of free lip to total lip length.

Meaning  This new understanding of the anatomy of the maxillary labial frenulum may be useful in future studies investigating the maxillary labial frenulum and neonatal breastfeeding difficulty.

Abstract

Importance  The maxillary labial frenulum and its potential contribution to breastfeeding difficulty may substantially affect public health. However, objective studies of the frenulum are limited.

Objective  To measure the variations in length, thickness, and attachments of the maxillary labial frenulum in healthy newborns and to identify which anatomic measurements could be used in further research investigating the maxillary labial frenulum.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective cross-sectional study conducted measurements on images of maxillary labial frenula captured by digital photography from 150 healthy newborns admitted to the newborn nursery at a tertiary care children’s hospital in Maryland between September 1, 2017, and April 1, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the measurement of numerous frenulum morphologic components.

Results  Of 150 newborns enrolled, 77 were female, the mean (SD) gestational age was 38.60 (1.72) weeks, and the mean (SD) birth weight was 3180 (570) g. The means and SDs of the morphologic components of the frenulum with the broadest distributions, which were most helpful in differentiating degrees of lip tethering, included the following: alveolar edge to frenulum gingival attachment, 1.53 (0.85) mm; frenulum length on stretch, 5.19 (1.68) mm; frenulum gingival attachment thickness, 0.84 (0.36) mm; frenulum labial attachment thickness, 2.83 (1.33) mm; and the percentage of free lip to total lip length, 87.38% (7.67%). Gingival attachment mean (SD) thickness differed between late-preterm (0.69 [0.24] mm) and term (0.88 [0.37] mm) infants (Cohen d, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.94 to −0.10).

Conclusions and Relevance  To our knowledge, this cross-sectional study was the first to objectively measure the numerous morphologic components of the upper lip anatomy in healthy newborns. Variations in maxillary labial frenulum morphology were identified, and some combination of the stated measurements may be used to create a more robust classification system to advance quality research in the association of lip-tie with breastfeeding difficulty.

×