Objective
To systematically review published literature describing the association between reflux and upper airway symptoms in children.
Design
Structured MEDLINE search of English-language articles published since 1966.
Subjects
We selected articles examining reflux in conjunction with stridor, apnea, sudden infant death syndrome, life-threatening events, and laryngomalacia. Studies that focused on lower airway symptoms or adults were excluded.
Outcome Measures
Articles were abstracted for patient factors, elements of study design, methods of reflux diagnosis, and definition of pathologic reflux.
Results
Ninety-nine articles were identified, 56 of which specifically examined reflux and upper respiratory symptoms in children. Of these, 10 compared reflux incidence in symptomatic patients and a set of predetermined control patients, while the remainder reported prevalence data only. Overall, symptomatic patients were diagnosed with reflux frequently, with a range from 27% to 100%. In studies that attempted to compare patients with controls, only 2 provided statistical comparisons of the patient groups, and none adjusted for confounding owing to study design. There was marked heterogeneity in methods used to diagnose reflux in the studies reviewed, with only 34% using dual-channel pH testing; definitions of pathologic reflux were also variable.
Conclusions
Evidence seems to support the hypothesis that reflux is associated with upper airway symptoms in children. However, the strength of this correlation and the risk of upper airway symptoms attributable to reflux are difficult to determine given the limitations of available literature. Future research studies should seek standard reflux testing methods, clear comparison groups, and more rigorous statistical methods.
CONSULTATION FOR upper respiratory symptoms in children is common for the pediatric otolaryngologist. In the past, gastroesophageal reflux has been considered closely associated with stridor and other upper respiratory symptoms in children. However, to our knowledge, the evidence behind this assumption and the impact of treatment on symptoms has not been previously summarized. Although some symptoms are relatively benign and can be followed expectantly (ie, stridor from laryngomalacia without failure to thrive or significant respiratory distress), other upper airway symptoms such as respiratory distress secondary to subglottic stenosis preventing extubation in a newborn or an acute life-threatening respiratory event require more immediate investigation.
Reflux is considered a risk factor for many upper respiratory symptoms in children.1 Additionally, otitis media, chronic sinusitis, lymphoid hyperplasia, hoarseness, laryngeal edema, or nodules have all been associated with reflux.2-14 Therefore, identifying and treating coexistent reflux could improve outcomes while eliminating the need for invasive procedures in this population of children.
Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a more recently identified clinical entity. In contrast to gastroesophageal reflux, laryngopharyngeal reflux involves gastric acid reflux through the upper esophageal sphincter into the pharynx rather than across the lower esophageal sphincter.15,16 As a result, laryngopharyngeal reflux can only be diagnosed by proximal (pharyngeal) pH probe placement, a technique refined in adults in the mid-1980s, but which is still not a commonly performed diagnostic modality for children despite its proposed role as the "gold standard."15,17,18 Any episode of laryngopharyngeal reflux in adults is believed to be pathologic,19-22 and few if any episodes of laryngopharyngeal reflux should be considered normal in children.23-25
Laryngopharyngeal reflux has been proposed to play a key role—at least as significant as gastroesophageal reflux—in several pediatric upper airway symptoms including subglottic stenosis and acute life-threatening respiratory events. However, studies linking reflux and upper respiratory symptoms in children are heterogeneous, representing a wide range of research designs, sample sizes, definitions of reflux, and treatment protocols. Thus, the purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature with the aim of determining the strength of the available data supporting the link between reflux and upper respiratory symptoms in children.
We searched MEDLINE, the electronic bibliography database of the US National Library of Medicine, using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms gastroesophageal reflux, aspiration, esophagitis;peptic in combination with key title and text words including stridor, apnea, ALTE (acute life-threatening respiratory event), SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), and laryngomalacia. To identify additional studies, we examined reference lists from published guidelines and book chapters in our topic area, as well as reference lists of our initially identified articles.1,26
We then excluded non–English-language articles, those not including an abstract, those that focused solely on lower airway symptoms (such as asthma), and those that studied adults only. Articles that met these criteria were then abstracted by trained reviewers (K.W.R. and A.D.A.) for key outcomes and elements of study design. Because of the recognized difficulties in quality scoring of trials, we did not score studies meeting our inclusion criteria. However, abstraction forms for each article included key elements pertaining to trial design, such as reporting of important confounders or biases, comparability of the patient groups, and methods for matching patient groups or accounting for bias. Because 24-hour dual-channel pH probe monitoring is considered the gold standard diagnostic test for reflux, we abstracted all articles for whether this test was part of outcome measurements.27-30 Finally, we also specifically abstracted articles for their definition of reflux.
Or analytic plan sought to distinguish articles that could be used to determine prevalence from articles that could allow estimation of risk for symptoms attributable to reflux. To this end, we split articles into 2 groups: (1) articles that reported prevalence of reflux within a defined subset of symptomatic patients and (2) articles that compared incidence of reflux in a symptomatic population with that in a predefined control group or those that attempted to match—via study design or statistical methods—reflux incidence in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Although all articles were reviewed for diagnostic modalities, this smaller subset of articles was then abstracted for elements that would allow estimation of the strength of the association between reflux and upper respiratory symptoms in children.
We initially identified 99 articles, 43 of which were excluded because they studied animals, enrolled adults, or focused on lower airway symptoms, yielding a core list of 56 articles that examined reflux and upper respiratory symptoms in children. We then excluded 2 studies that enrolled asymptomatic patients and reported population normative data only31,32 and 3 case series that did not report explicit entry criteria.33-35 Five additional studies were excluded because they involved treatment trials but did not include a control group from which conclusions regarding prevalence could be drawn.36-40 Finally, we excluded studies in which reflux testing was performed so inconsistently that we could not discern which patients were tested and which were not,13 that reported results that were not clearly peer reviewed,5 that enrolled patients with reflux only,12,41 that did not report objective diagnostic data,42 and that correlated periods of apnea in patients with known reflux.43 Studies in which it was unclear whether symptoms and reflux incidences overlapped were also excluded.44-46
Thus, our final group of articles reported results from patients enrolled in 35 studies published since 1979. As a group, these studies were uniformly based at academic medical centers or children's hospitals. Of these studies, 21 (60%) were performed prospectively and 14 (40%) were performed retrospectively, most often via medical record review. Of identified studies, only 12 (34%) explicitly reported results from dual-channel pH probe testing to diagnose reflux and 21 (60%) used other pH probe tests. Of additional tests, the most common modality was laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (n = 13 [37%]), followed by barium swallow (n = 10 [29%]), gastric-emptying studies (n = 6 [17%]), and esophageal biopsy (n = 6 [17%]).
Of the 35 studies, 9 (26%) included subjects with multiple upper airway symptoms, 13 (37%) included subjects with apnea or a history of an acute life-threatening respiratory event, and 4 (11%) included subjects with laryngomalacia. Three studies (8%) examined patients with nasal obstruction or patients presenting with stridor from croup or subglottic stenosis. Sinusitis was the presenting symptom in 2 studies (6%), and hoarseness was the presenting symptom in 1 study (3%). Twenty-five articles reported data regarding prevalence only, and 10 attempted to compare reflux incidence in symptomatic patients with that of a control group.
Studies reporting reflux prevalence in patients with upper airway symptoms
Twenty-five articles reported the prevalence of reflux in patients with upper airway symptoms (Table 1). These articles displayed a range of definitions of reflux, with most defining pathologic reflux as various combinations of duration of esophageal acidity and severity of acidity. However, these definitions were inconsistent and ranged from rigorous, previously validated guidelines for diagnosis of reflux 47,52 to those with less apparent justification.55,65
The most common symptom examined was apnea, which was a focus of investigation in 8 (32%) of these 25 identified studies, 4 (50%) of which involved premature infants. These 4 articles reported a range between 33% and 100% in reflux prevalence in premature patients with apnea compared with a range between 25% and 100% in full-term infants with reflux. A higher reflux prevalence was noted in studies that provided results of proximal pH probe testing29,66; lower prevalence of reflux was noted in studies that performed pH probe testing of shorter duration or that reported distal results only. A similarly broad range in reflux prevalence was noted for other upper airway symptoms, with most articles reporting prevalence of reflux in excess of 50%.
Studies comparing control and symptomatic patients
Ten articles reported prevalence of reflux in patients with upper airway symptoms and attempted to compare these patients with a control patient group (Table 2). Control groups were generally defined as asymptomatic patients or patients with symptoms not related to the upper respiratory tract. Few studies attempted any matching based on age, comorbidities (ie, prematurity), or other clinical factors, and only 2 studies 74,78 reported any baseline information describing these factors in their patient groups. In addition, few studies reported any specific rationale for case finding or choice of controls. Similar to the studies reporting prevalence only, these articles used variable methods to diagnose reflux, with only 3 using dual-channel pH probe testing for even a proportion of patients.
Prevalence of reflux in symptomatic groups in these articles was similar to those seen in prevalence studies, with a range between 27% and 100%. Overall, most articles suggested an excess of reflux in symptomatic patients, with 7 (70%) of 10 using statistical methods to compare symptomatic patients with controls. However, other than the articles by See et al78 and Newman et al,74 none of these articles reported more than age and sex information regarding their patients, and none attempted to account for biases in their study design using statistical methods.
The results of our systematic review suggest that, although it is highly likely that reflux is associated with upper airway symptoms in children, the strength of this correlation is very difficult to determine. The available literature comprises studies largely derived from referral centers, most of which have substantial methodologic flaws related to inconsistent methods used for diagnosing reflux, biased patient populations, and limited statistical methods.
There is general agreement that the 24-hour dual-channel pH probe with 1 channel in the esophagus and 1 channel in the pharynx is the diagnostic study of choice for reflux.18,79,80 Although reproducibility of pediatric 24-hour dual-channel pH probe results has been questioned81 and false-negative rates up to 20% have been reported, few other testing modalities have similar discriminative power. Barium swallow, scintiscan, endoscopy with biopsy, and bronchial washings for lipid-laden macrophages have been used,82,83 but they demonstrate sensitivities and specificities lower than dual-channel pH probe.84,85
Investigators have tried alternate diagnostic testing to aid diagnosis of reflux. Laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy findings—especially arytenoid edema, postglottic edema, and lingual tonsillar hypertrophy—have been demonstrated to correlate with acid exposure.45,54 However, few data exist to correlate laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy findings with pH probe results. Esophageal biopsy is promising, but also has not been compared with dual-channel pH probe testing, nor has its safety and feasibility compared with alternate testing modalities been proven.64,68 Also, studies using esophageal biopsy did not provide any information about pharyngeal acid exposure or laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Most studies we reviewed did not use dual-channel pH probe testing for diagnosis of reflux, and most used single-probe tests. Many studies combined results from multiple reflux tests, considering a patient to have reflux if he or she had just 1 positive diagnostic test result. Such "pooled positivity criterion" further muddies the diagnostic waters in that sequential testing may magnify the imprecision of individual tests. That is, if one orders a panel of 20 tests, each of which is 95% accurate, one can expect to have at least 1 false-positive test result and an inflated prevalence estimate. In contrast, many of the tests used for reflux have sensitivities far lower than 95% for detection of pathologic reflux, raising the possibility that these studies underestimate true prevalence.
Even within the studies that used pH probe testing, we observed a moderate amount of variability in the diagnostic criteria for reflux in terms of duration and severity of acid exposure. Although individual studies generally adhered to a published definition, across studies several criteria were used, limiting our ability to directly compare results. Even when appropriate diagnostic testing is performed, not all positive results necessarily mandate treatment. Some amount of reflux, especially in premature or newborn infants, may be physiologic and not pathologic. Comparison of different age groups would then reflect the natural history of improvement with age rather than true prevalence rates of pathologic reflux.
Should clinicians treat first and ask questions later?
Many consider treatment for reflux a necessary first step in the management of various airway symptoms. In an uncontrolled trial, patients with choanal atresia who received reflux therapy formed less granulation tissue and needed fewer revision procedures.3 Another investigator found that aggressive empiric treatment of reflux in patients with subglottic stenosis led to symptomatic improvement and eliminated the need for surgical intervention.9 However, other studies showing no impact of reflux treatment on airway surgery for subglottic stenosis have refuted this finding.86
Results from our systematic review suggest a reason for these apparently conflicting findings from clinical trials, since it is likely that an uncertain link between reflux and specific upper airway symptoms leads to uncertain clinical response. Empiric reflux treatment, especially when a low-risk approach is chosen, is likely to provide more benefit than risk as a first step. However, clinicians should be aware that little high-quality evidence exists to direct them to groups of patients who are most likely to benefit.
The studies we reviewed, although suggesting higher incidence of reflux in patients with upper airway symptoms, do not yet provide ample evidence to determine the magnitude of a causal link. Such a determination will require a study design using an appropriate control group, perhaps chosen on the basis of comorbidities or stage of development rather than site of care (ie, pediatric intensive care unit or referral for reflux tests on the basis of an alternate diagnosis). Admittedly, the identification and selection of controls may be difficult, but in the absence of an ideal group, adherence to standards of reporting that clinicians can use to make decisions about treatment should be the minimal standard. For example, many of the studies in our review were based at tertiary care centers and were likely subject to substantial referral bias. Few studies provided any patient information other than age or sex, making it nearly impossible to discern whether results from these studies could be used by non–tertiary care-based clinicians.87-89 In addition to being potentially helpful in multivariable models by producing adjusted results, detailed information about patients' comorbidities would be useful for clincians simply seeking to apply evidence to their practices.
Our systematic review of studies examining the association between reflux and upper airway symptoms reveals that the literature has substantial shortcomings in terms of study design, reporting of results, methods to account for bias, and standard definitions of reflux. Although reflux plays an important role in some children with upper airway symptoms, the magnitude of this risk remains unclear. Future studies addressing these shortcomings will be required to provide the evidence for clinicians faced with these often challenging patients.
Corresponding author and reprints: Kristina W. Rosbe, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, Suite A730, San Francisco, CA 94143-0342 (e-mail: krosbe@itsa.ucsf.edu).
Submitted for publication August 26, 2002; final revision received February 12, 2003; accepted March 12, 2003.
This study was presented at the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology; May 5, 2003; Nashville, Tenn.
1.Rudolph
CDMazur
LJLiptak
GS
et al Guidelines for evaluation and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in infants and children: recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.2001;32:S1-S31.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 2.Belmont
JRGrundfast
K Congenital laryngeal stridor (laryngomalacia): etiologic factors and associated disorders.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.1984;93:430-437.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Beste
DJConley
SFBrown
CW Gastroesophageal reflux complicating choanal atresia repair.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1994;29:51-58.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Bothwell
MRParsons
DSTalbot
ABarbero
GJWilder
B Outcome of reflux therapy on pediatric chronic sinusitis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1999;121:255-262.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Contencin
PMaurage
CPloyet
MJSeid
ABSinaasappel
M Gastroesophageal reflux and ENT disorders in childhood.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1995;32:S135-S144.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Gaynor
EB Otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol.1991;86:801-808.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 8.Gumpert
LKalach
NDupont
CContencin
P Hoarseness and gastroesophageal reflux in children.
J Laryngol Otol.1998;112:49-54.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Halstead
LA Gastroesophageal reflux: a critical factor in pediatric subglottic stenosis.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1999;120:683-688.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Herbst
JJMinton
SDBook
LS Gastroesophageal reflux causing respiratory distress and apnea in newborn infants.
J Pediatr.1979;95:763-768.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Kenna
MA The effect of gastroesophageal reflux on the pediatric airway.
Int Anesthesiol Clin.1992;30:83-91.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Nielson
DWHeldt
GPTooley
WH Stridor and gastroesophageal reflux in infants.
Pediatrics.1990;85:1034-1039.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Waki
EYMadgy
DNBelenky
WMGower
VC The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in recurrent croup.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1995;32:223-232.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Yellon
RF The spectrum of reflux-associated otolaryngologic problems in infants and children.
Am J Med.1997;103:125S-129S.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Postma
GNBelafsky
PCAviv
JEKoufman
JA Laryngopharyngeal reflux testing.
Ear Nose Throat J.2002;81:14-18.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Bach
KKMcGuirt
WF
JrPostma
GN Pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Ear Nose Throat J.2002;81:27-31.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Little
JPMatthews
BLGlock
MS
et al Extraesophageal pediatric reflux: 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring of 222 children.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.1997;169:1-16.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Postma
GN Ambulatory pH monitoring methodology.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.2000;184:10-14.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Amin
MRPostma
GNJohnson
PDigges
NKoufman
JA Proton pump inhibitor resistance in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2001;125:374-378.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Koufman
JSataloff
RTToohill
R Laryngopharyngeal reflux: consensus conference report.
J Voice.1996;10:215-216.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 21.Ulualp
SOToohill
RJ Laryngopharyngeal reflux: state of the art diagnosis and treatment.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am.2000;33:785-802.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Maronian
NCAzadeh
HWaugh
PHillel
A Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and subglottic stenosis.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.2001;110:606-612.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Contencin
PNarcy
P Nasopharyngeal pH monitoring in infants and children with chronic rhinopharyngitis.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1991;22:249-256.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Phipps
CDWood
WEGibson
WSCochran
WJ Gastroesophageal reflux contributing to chronic sinus disease in children: a prospective analysis.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2000;126:831-836.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Zalzal
GHTran
LP Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am.2000;33:151-161.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Putnam
PE Gastroesophageal Reflux. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1996.
27.Richter
JEBradley
LADeMeester
TRWu
WC Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values: influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender.
Dig Dis Sci.1992;37:849-856.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Vincent
DA
JrGarrett
JDRadionoff
SLReussner
LAStasney
CR The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database.
J Voice.2000;14:247-254.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Conley
SFWerlin
SLBeste
DJ Proximal pH-metry for diagnosis of upper airway complications of gastroesophageal reflux.
J Otolaryngol.1995;24:295-298.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 30.Cucchiara
SStaiano
AGobio Casali
LBoccieri
APaone
FM Value of the 24 hour intraoesophageal pH monitoring in children.
Gut.1990;31:129-133.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 31.Vandenplas
YSacre-Smits
L Continuous 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in 285 asymptomatic infants 0-15 months old.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1987;6:220-224.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 32.Vandenplas
YGoyvaerts
HHelven
RSacre
L Gastroesophageal reflux, as measured by 24-hour pH monitoring, in 509 healthy infants screened for risk of sudden infant death syndrome.
Pediatrics.1991;88:834-840.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 33.Burton
DMPransky
SMKatz
RMKearns
DBSeid
AB Pediatric airway manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.1992;101:742-749.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 34.Bauman
NMSandler
ADSmith
RJ Respiratory manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.1996;105:23-32.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 35.van den Abbeele
TBruhier
NNarcy
P Severe laryngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux in children.
Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl.1997;16:237-238.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 36.Ewer
AKJames
METobin
JM Prone and left lateral positioning reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux in preterm infants.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.1999;81:F201-F205.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 37.Jolley
SGHerbst
JJJohnson
DGMatlak
MEBook
LS Surgery in children with gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory symptoms.
J Pediatr.1980;96:194-198.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 38.Kimball
ALCarlton
DP Gastroesophageal reflux medications in the treatment of apnea in premature infants.
J Pediatr.2001;138:355-360.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 39.Krishnamoorthy
MMintz
ALiem
TApplebaum
H Diagnosis and treatment of respiratory symptoms of initially unsuspected gastroesophageal reflux in infants.
Am Surg.1994;60:783-785.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 40.Suskind
DLZeringue
GP
IIIKluka
EAUdall
JLiu
DC Gastroesophageal reflux and pediatric otolaryngologic disease: the role of antireflux surgery.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2001;127:511-514.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 41.Walsh
JKFarrell
MKKeenan
WJLucas
MKramer
M Gastroesophageal reflux in infants: relation to apnea.
J Pediatr.1981;99:197-201.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 42.Wenzl
TGSilny
JSchenke
SPeschgens
THeimann
GSkopnik
H Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory phenomena in infants: status of the intraluminal impedance technique.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1999;28:423-428.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 43.Menon
APSchefft
GLThach
BT Apnea associated with regurgitation in infants.
J Pediatr.1985;106:625-629.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 44.Boix-Ochoa
JLafuenta
JMGil-Vernet
JM Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux.
J Pediatr Surg.1980;15:74-78.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 45.Carr
MMNguyen
APoje
CPizzuto
MNagy
MBrodsky
L Correlation of findings on direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy with presence of extraesophageal reflux disease.
Laryngoscope.2000;110:1560-1562.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 46.Jolley
SGHalpern
LMTunell
WPJohnson
DGSterling
CE The risk of sudden infant death from gastroesophageal reflux.
J Pediatr Surg.1991;26:691-696.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 47.Andze
GOBrandt
MLSt Vil
DBensoussan
ALBlanchard
H Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in 500 children with respiratory symptoms: the value of pH monitoring.
J Pediatr Surg.1991;26:295-300.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 48.Euler
ARByrne
WJ Twenty-four-hour esophageal intraluminal pH probe testing: a comparative analysis.
Gastroenterology.1981;80:957-961.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 49.Arad-Cohen
NCohen
ATirosh
E The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and apnea in infants.
J Pediatr.2000;137:321-326.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 50.Barrington
KJTan
KRich
W Apnea at discharge and gastro-esophageal reflux in the preterm infant.
J Perinatol.2002;22:8-11.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 51.Wiener
GJKoufman
JAWu
WCCooper
JBRichter
JECastell
DO Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.
Am J Gastroenterol.1989;84:1503-1508.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 52.Bouchard
SLallier
MYazbeck
SBensoussan
A The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux: when is a pH study indicated?
J Pediatr Surg.1999;34:1053-1056.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 53.Carr
MMNguyen
ANagy
MPoje
CPizzuto
MBrodsky
L Clinical presentation as a guide to the identification of GERD in children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2000;54:27-32.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 54.Carr
MMNagy
MLPizzuto
MPPoje
CPBrodsky
LS Correlation of findings at direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy with gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: a prospective study.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2001;127:369-374.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 55.Giannoni
CSulek
MFriedman
EMDuncan
NO
III Gastroesophageal reflux association with laryngomalacia: a prospective study.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.1998;43:11-20.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 56.Halpern
LMJolley
SGTunell
WPJohnson
DGSterling
CE The mean duration of gastroesophageal reflux during sleep as an indicator of respiratory symptoms from gastroesophageal reflux in children.
J Pediatr Surg.1991;26:686-690.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 57.Jolley
SGJohnson
DGHerbst
JJPena
AGarnier
R An assessment of gastroesophageal reflux in children by extended pH monitoring of the distal esophagus.
Surgery.1978;84:16-24.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 58.Jolley
SGHerbst
JJJohnson
DGMatlak
MEBook
LS Esophageal pH monitoring during sleep identifies children with respiratory symptoms from gastroesophageal reflux.
Gastroenterology.1981;80:1501-1506.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 59.Jolley
SGTunell
WPCarson
JASmith
EIGrunow
J The accuracy of abbreviated esophageal pH monitoring in children.
J Pediatr Surg.1984;19:848-854.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 60.Marino
AJAssing
ECarbone
MTHiatt
IMHegyi
TGraff
M The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants.
J Perinatol.1995;15:369-371.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 61.Matthews
BLLittle
JPMcGuirt
WF
JrKoufman
JA Reflux in infants with laryngomalacia: results of 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1999;120:860-864.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 62.McMurray
JSHolinger
LD Otolaryngic manifestations in children presenting with apparent life-threatening events.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1997;116:575-579.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 63.Paton
JYMacfadyen
UWilliams
ASimpson
H Gastro-oesophageal reflux and apnoeic pauses during sleep in infancy—no direct relation.
Eur J Pediatr.1990;149:680-686.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 64.Stroh
BCFaust
RARimell
FL Results of esophageal biopsies performed during triple endoscopy in the pediatric patient.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1998;124:545-549.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 65.Veereman-Wauters
GBochner
AVan Caillie-Bertrand
M Gastroesophageal reflux in infants with a history of near-miss sudden infant death.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1991;12:319-323.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 66.Vijayaratnam
VLin
CHSimpson
PTolia
V Lack of significant proximal esophageal acid reflux in infants presenting with respiratory symptoms.
Pediatr Pulmonol.1999;27:231-235.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 67.Walner
DLStern
YGerber
MERudolph
CBaldwin
CYCotton
RT Gastroesophageal reflux in patients with subglottic stenosis.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1998;124:551-555.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 68.Yellon
RFCoticchia
JDixit
S Esophageal biopsy for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux-associated otolaryngologic problems in children.
Am J Med.2000;108:131S-138S.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 69.Zalesska-Krecicka
MKrecicki
TIwanczak
BBlitek
AHorobiowska
M Laryngeal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.
Acta Otolaryngol.2002;122:306-310.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 70.de Ajuriaguerra
MRadvanyi-Bouvet
MFHuon
CMoriette
G Gastroesophageal reflux and apnea in prematurely born infants during wakefulness and sleep.
AJDC.1991;145:1132-1136.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 71.Bibi
HKhvolis
EShoseyov
D
et al The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in children with tracheomalacia and laryngomalacia.
Chest.2001;119:409-413.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 72.Carr
MMPoje
CPEhrig
DBrodsky
LS Incidence of reflux in young children undergoing adenoidectomy.
Laryngoscope.2001;111:2170-2172.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 73.Contencin
PNarcy
P Gastropharyngeal reflux in infants and children: a pharyngeal pH monitoring study.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1992;118:1028-1030.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 74.Newman
LJRusse
JGlassman
MS
et al Patterns of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients with apparent life-threatening events.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1989;8:157-160.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 75.Sondheimer
JM Continuous monitoring of distal esophageal pH: a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux in infants.
J Pediatr.1980;96:804-807.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 76.Spitzer
ARBoyle
JTTuchman
DNFox
WW Awake apnea associated with gastroesophageal reflux: a specific clinical syndrome.
J Pediatr.1984;104:200-205.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 77.Sacre
LVandenplas
Y Gastroesophageal reflux associated with respiratory abnormalities during sleep.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1989;9:28-33.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 78.See
CCNewman
LJBerezin
S
et al Gastroesophageal reflux-induced hypoxemia in infants with apparent life-threatening event(s).
AJDC.1989;143:951-954.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 79.Sarani
BGleiber
MEvans
SR Esophageal pH monitoring, indications, and methods.
J Clin Gastroenterol.2002;34:200-206.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 80.Strobel
CTByrne
WJAment
MEEuler
AR Correlation of esophageal lengths in children with height: application to the Tuttle test without prior esophageal manometry.
J Pediatr.1979;94:81-48.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 81.Mahajan
LWyllie
ROliva
LBalsells
FSteffen
RKay
M Reproducibility of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in pediatric patients.
Pediatrics.1998;101:260-263.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 82.Ahrens
PNoll
CKitz
RWilligens
PZielen
SHofmann
D Lipid-laden alveolar macrophages (LLAM): a useful marker of silent aspiration in children.
Pediatr Pulmonol.1999;28:83-88.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 83.Gonzalez Fernandez
FArguelles Martin
FRodriguez de Quesada
BGonzalez Hachero
JValls Sanchez de Puerta
AGentles
M Gastroesophageal scintigraphy: a useful screening test for GE reflux.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr.1987;6:217-219.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 84.Tolia
VKuhns
LKauffman
RE Comparison of simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring and scintigraphy in infants with gastroesophageal reflux.
Am J Gastroenterol.1993;88:661-664.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 85.Tolia
VCalhoun
JAKuhns
LRKauffman
RE Lack of correlation between extended pH monitoring and scintigraphy in the evaluation of infants with gastroesophageal reflux.
J Lab Clin Med.1990;115:559-563.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 86.Zalzal
GHChoi
SSPatel
KM The effect of gastroesophageal reflux on laryngotracheal reconstruction.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.1996;122:297-300.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 87.Jaeschke
RGuyatt
GHSackett
DLfor the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature, III: how to use an article about a diagnostic test, B: what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients?
JAMA.1994;271:703-707.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 88.McAlister
FAStraus
SEGuyatt
GHHaynes
RBfor the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature, XX: integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient.
JAMA.2000;283:2829-2836.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 89.Richardson
WSWilson
MCGuyatt
GHCook
DJNishikawa
Jfor the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group Users' guides to the medical literature, XV: how to use an article about disease probability for differential diagnosis.
JAMA.1999;281:1214-1219.
Google Scholar