Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis Revisited: Comparison of Multidetector Axial Sections, Multiplanar Reconstructions, and Virtual Sinoscopy With Endoscopic Sinus Surgery | Facial Plastic Surgery | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Pearlman  SJLawson  WBiller  HFFriedman  WHPotter  GD Isolated sphenoid sinus disease.  Laryngoscope 1989;99 (7, pt 1) 716- 720PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sethi  DS Isolated sphenoid lesions: diagnosis and management.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120 (5) 730- 736PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Proetz  A Operation for the sphenoid sinus.  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1949;53538- 545Google Scholar
Hähnel  SErtl-Wagner  BTasman  AJForsting  MJansen  O Relative value of MR imaging as compared with CT in the diagnosis of inflammatory paranasal sinus disease.  Radiology 1999;210 (1) 171- 176PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Becker  SP Applied anatomy of the paranasal sinuses with emphasis on endoscopic surgery.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1994;1623- 32PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bansberg  SFHarner  SGForbes  G Relationship of the optic nerve to the paranasal sinuses as shown by computed tomography.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;96 (4) 331- 335PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sonkens  JWHarnsberger  HRBlanch  GMBabbel  RWHunt  S The impact of screening sinus CT on the planning of functional endoscopic sinus surgery.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105 (6) 802- 813PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bingham  BShankar  LHawke  M Pitfalls in computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses.  J Otolaryngol 1991;20 (6) 414- 418PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt  TMRapp-Bernhardt  UFessel  ALudwig  KReichel  GGrote  R CT scanning of the paranasal sinuses: axial helical CT with reconstruction in the coronal direction versus coronal helical CT.  Br J Radiol 1998;71 (848) 846- 851PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Han  PPirsig  WIlgen  FGorich  JSokiranski  R Virtual endoscopy of the nasal cavity in comparison with fiberoptic endoscopy.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257 (10) 578- 583PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Roth  MLanza  DCZinreich  JYousem  DScanlan  KAKennedy  DW Advantages and disadvantages of three-dimensional computed tomography intraoperative localization for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.  Laryngoscope 1995;105 (12, pt 1) 1279- 1286PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Bakker  NHFokkens  WGrimbergen  C Investigation in training needs of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS).  Rhinology 2005;43 (2) 104- 108PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
July 2007

Chronic Sphenoid Sinusitis Revisited: Comparison of Multidetector Axial Sections, Multiplanar Reconstructions, and Virtual Sinoscopy With Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Radio-diagnosis (Drs Wankhar, Khandelwal, Saxena, and Batchala) and Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Gupta), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; and Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Drs Bapuraj and Gandhi).

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(7):710-716. doi:10.1001/archotol.133.7.710

Objectives  To assess the role of multidetector computed tomography (CT) and CT virtual sinoscopy in the evaluation of chronic sphenoid sinusitis and to compare the imaging findings with functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Design  Prospective study.

Setting  Tertiary care teaching hospital.

Patients  Thirty patients with chronic sphenoid sinusitis referred for preoperative CT.

Interventions  Thin-section helical axial CT was performed using a multidetector CT scanner with multiplanar reformation (MPR) and volume-rendered or virtual sinoscopy images. Sixty sinuses were divided into quadrants for analysis. Extrasinus extension was labeled as the “fifth quadrant.”

Main Outcome Measures  Imaging findings were compared with those of functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and accuracy of the imaging modality was determined.

Results  Multidetector CT (axial CT and MPR) was found to be 100% sensitive, specific, and accurate in the evaluation of extent of sinusitis, status of the sinus septum, integrity of the optic nerve canal in relation to the sinus, and type of sinus pneumatization. Axial CT and MPR images showed sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 92% compared with functional endoscopic sinus surgery in evaluating the ostia. Regarding carotid canal integrity, axial CT and MPRs were 100% sensitive and 98% specific. Virtual sinoscopy showed sensitivity and specificity of 67% and 92%, respectively, for the 22 ostia that could be visualized and evaluated using this modality.

Conclusions  Axial multidetector CT with secondary MPRs provide the necessary preoperative information regarding extent of disease and sphenoid sinus anatomy. Virtual sinoscopy is a navigational aid, an adjunct to endoscopy, and an educational tool for surgeons-in-training.