Prognostic Value of Anterior Rhinomanometry in Diode Laser Turbinoplasty | Facial Plastic Surgery | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Janda  PSroka  RTauber  SBaumgartner  RGrevers  GLeunig  A Diode laser treatment of hyperplastic inferior nasal turbinates.  Lasers Surg Med 2000;27 (2) 129- 139PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Sroka  RJanda  PKillian  TVaz  FBetz  CSLeunig  A Comparison of long term results after Ho:YAG and diode laser treatment of hyperplastic inferior nasal turbinates.  Lasers Surg Med 2007;39 (4) 324- 331PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Wheeler  SMCorey  JP Evaluation of upper airway obstruction: an ENT perspective.  Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2008;21 (3) 433- 441PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Clement  PARGordts  FStandardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, IRS, and ERS, Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.  Rhinology 2005;43 (3) 169- 179PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Høyvoll  LRLunde  KLi  HSDahle  SWentzel-Larsen  TSteinsvåg  SK Effects of an external nasal dilator strip (ENDS) compared to xylometazolin nasal spray.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264 (11) 1289- 1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Naito  KMiyata  SSaito  SSakurai  KTakeuchi  K Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2001;258 (10) 505- 508PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Eccles  RJones  AS The effect of menthol on nasal resistance to air flow.  J Laryngol Otol 1983;97 (8) 705- 709PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Naito  KCole  PChaban  ROprysk  D Nasal resistance, sensation of obstruction, and rhinoscopic findings compared.  Am J Rhinol 1988;2 (3) 65- 69doi:10.2500/105065888781693177Google Scholar
9.
Sipilä  JAntila  JSuonpää  J Pre- and postoperative evaluation of patients with nasal obstruction undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253 (4-5) 237- 239PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Tan  BKLane  AP Endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of nasal obstruction.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42 (2) 227- 240, viiPubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Farmer  SEJQuine  SMEccles  R Efficacy of inferior turbinate coblation for treatment of nasal obstruction.  J Laryngol Otol 2009;123 (3) 309- 314PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Corey  JP Acoustic rhinometry: should we be using it?  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14 (1) 29- 34PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Harrill  WCPillsbury  HC  III McGuirt  WFStewart  MG Radiofrequency turbinate reduction: a NOSE evaluation.  Laryngoscope 2007;117 (11) 1912- 1919PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
October 18, 2010

Prognostic Value of Anterior Rhinomanometry in Diode Laser Turbinoplasty

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136(10):1015-1019. doi:10.1001/archoto.2010.161
Abstract

Objective  To identify objective criteria predicting the success of diode laser-assisted turbinoplasty.

Design  Prospective before-and-after trial with follow-up of 8 weeks.

Setting  Outpatient department of a tertiary referral center.

Patients  Forty-one patients with nasal obstruction caused by hyperplastic inferior nasal turbinates.

Intervention  Active anterior rhinomanometry with and without decongestion was used to assess the patients both before and after diode laser–assisted turbinate surgery. Surgery was performed under local anesthesia in “contact mode” using a continuous diode laser. In addition, a questionnaire assessed the subjective postoperative benefit.

Main Outcome Measures  Presurgical effect of topical decongestion was correlated with postoperative improvement of nasal airflow and patients' subjective satisfaction.

Results  Turbinoplasty significantly improved the mean (SD) nasal airflow by 37.1% (52.4%) (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.6%-53.7%), from 509.8 (189.2) cm3/s (95% CI, 450.1-569.5) to 660.9 (285.4) cm3/s (95% CI, 570.8-751.0) (P < .001). There was no significant correlation between patients' subjective satisfaction and improvement of nasal airflow postoperatively (rs = −0.01; P = .93). There was a strong correlation between the presurgical effect of topical decongestion and the improvement of nasal airflow by surgery (rs = 0.42; P = .01). The correlation was even stronger when the absolute values were adjusted by the preoperative nasal airflow baseline (rs = 0.55; P = .01).

Conclusions  Rhinomanometry with topical decongestion has a high predictive value for the objective outcome of diode laser–assisted turbinoplasty. Thus, performing a rhinomanometry with topical decongestion and calculating the relative spread of decongestion can help to estimate the patients' benefit from diode laser–assisted turbinate surgery.

×