The Long-term Indwelling Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis for Alaryngeal Voice Rehabilitation | Fungal Infections | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Weissenbruch  RVAlbers  FWJ Vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Provox voice prosthesis.  Clin Otolaryngol. 1993;18359- 364Google ScholarCrossref
2.
Heaton  JMParker  AJ Indwelling tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses post-laryngectomy in Sheffield, UK: a 6-year review.  Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1994;114675- 678Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Van Den Hoogen  FJAOudes  MJHombergen  GNijdam  HFManni  JJ The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: a prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements.  Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1996;116119- 124Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Blom  EDSinger  MIHamaker  RC A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112440- 447Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Izdebski  KReed  CGRoss  JCHilsinger  RL  Jr Problems with tracheoesophageal fistula voice restoration in totally laryngectomized patients: a review of 95 cases.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120840- 845Google ScholarCrossref
Original Article
March 1999

The Long-term Indwelling Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis for Alaryngeal Voice Rehabilitation

Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Speech and Language Pathology (Dr Graville) and Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery (Mr Gross and Drs Andersen, Everts, and Cohen), Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(3):288-292. doi:10.1001/archotol.125.3.288
Abstract

Objective  To analyze the initial experience at Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, with the use of long-term indwelling tracheoesophageal voice prostheses.

Design  Retrospective case series.

Setting  Tertiary referral academic medical center.

Patients  Thirty patients undergoing speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy during a period of 18 months.

Intervention  Insertion of a long-term indwelling tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis.

Main Outcome Measures  Duration of use, complications.

Results  The mean duration of placement for a single prosthesis was 4.9 months (148 days), with a range of 14 to 330 days. Sixteen of the 30 patients encountered problems with leakage because of fungal colonization, the majority of which (15 of 16 cases) were solved with either oral or topical application of nystatin. Size matching in terms of prothesis length and tract length was critical, and problems of this nature were encountered in 11 of 30 patients. The incorporation of a second system of prostheses that offered an increased number of size options solved these problems in all of these patients. Ultimately, 27 of 30 patients were able to successfully wear these prostheses.

Conclusions  The indwelling tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis offers patients all the advantages of tracheoesophageal speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy without the inconvenience of frequent prosthesis changes. With careful attention to the details of fitting and care, it can be worn by the majority of patients successfully.

×