[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1979

Binaural Interaction in Brainstem-Evoked Responses

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and the Kresge Hearing Research Laboratory of the South, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans. Dr Dobie is now with the University of Washington, Seattle.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1979;105(7):391-398. doi:10.1001/archotol.1979.00790190017004
Abstract

• Binaural interaction (BI) in brainstem-auditory—evoked responses (BSERs) was defined as any deviation from the predictions of a model that assumes two independent monaural BSER generators whose outputs are additive. Brainstem-auditory—evoked responses were recorded in response to right (R) monaural, left (L) monaural, and binaural click stimuli. The monaural BSERs were added to give the model's prediction (P) of binaurally evoked BSER (P = L + R), and this trace was then subtracted from the actual binaurally evoked response (B). The resultant difference trace (D = BP) represents the derived Bl. In each of ten guinea pigs, a strong BI was present in the peak IV region (latency = 3.5 to 4.0 ms). This interaction is probably present with interaural intensity differences of up to 40 dB and interaural time differences of up to 3 ms. Preliminary studies suggest the presence of a similar phenomenon in human BSERs.

(Arch Otolaryngol 105:391-398, 1979)

References
1.
Huang CM, Buchwald JS:  Interpretation of the vertex short-latency acoustic response: A study of single neurons in the brain stem .  Brain Res 137:291-303, 1977.Crossref
2.
Buchwald JS, Huang CM:  Far-field acoustic response: Origins in the cat .  Science 189:382-384, 1975.Crossref
3.
Starr A, Achor LJ:  Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease .  Arch Neurol 32:761-768, 1975.Crossref
4.
Wernick JS, Starr A:  Binaural interaction in the superior olivary complex of the cat .  J Neurophysiol 31:428-441, 1968.
5.
Moushegian G, Rupert AL, Gidda JS:  Functional characteristics of superior olivary neurons to binaural stimuli .  J Neurophysiol 38:1037-1046, 1975.
6.
Flammino F, Clopton BM:  Neural responses in the inferior colliculus of albino rat to binaural stimuli .  J Acoust Soc Am 57:692-695, 1975.Crossref
7.
Erulkar SC:  The responses of single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat to acoustic stimuli .  Proc R Soc Br 150:336-355, 1959.Crossref
8.
Nilsson R, Liden G, Rosen M, et al:  Directional hearing, three different test-methods .  Scand Audiol 2:125-131, 1973.Crossref
9.
Snow JB, Rintelmann WF, Miller JM, et al:  Central auditory imperception .  Laryngoscope 87:1450-1471, 1977.Crossref
10.
Huang CM, Buchwald JS:  Factors that affect amplitude and latency of vertex short-latency acoustic responses in the cat .  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:179-186, 1978.Crossref
11.
Webster DB, Webster M:  Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei .  Arch Otolaryngol 103:392-396, 1977.Crossref
12.
Clopton BM, Silverman MS:  Plasticity of binaural interaction: II. Critical period and changes in midline response .  J Neurophysiol 40:1275-1280, 1977.
13.
Student M, Sohmer H:  Evidence from auditory nerve and brainstem evoked responses for an organic brain lesion in children with autistic traits .  J Autism Child Schizophr 8:13-19, 1978.Crossref
×