The Importance of High-Frequency Audibility in the Speech and Language Development of Children With Hearing Loss | Otolaryngology | JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.234.102. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Bess  FHDodd-Murphy  JParker  RA Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status.  Ear Hear.1998;19:339-354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Davis  JMElfenbein  JSchum  RBentler  RA Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children.  J Speech Hear Disord.1986;51:53-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Davis  JMShepard  NStelmachowicz  PGorga  M Characteristics of hearing-impaired children in the public schools, II: psychoeducational data.  J Speech Hear Disord.1981;46:130-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Elfenbein  JLHardin-Jones  MADavis  JM Oral communication skills of children who are hard of hearing.  J Speech Hear Res.1994;37:216-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Markides  A The speech of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to factors affecting intelligibility.  Br J Disord Commun.1970;5:126-140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Markides  A The Speech of Hearing-Impaired Children.  Dover, NH: Manchester University Press; 1983.
7.
Norbury  CFBishop  DVBriscoe  J Production of English finite verb morphology: a comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment.  J Speech Lang Hear Res.2001;44:165-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Ching  TYDillon  HByrne  D Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification.  J Acoust Soc Am.1998;103:1128-1140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Hogan  CATurner  CW High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.  J Acoust Soc Am.1998;104:432-441.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Murray  NByrne  D Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids.  Aust J Audiol.1986;8:21-28.Google Scholar
11.
Rankovic  CM An application of the articulation index to hearing aid fitting.  J Speech Hear Res.1991;34:391-402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Skinner  MW Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: effects of high-frequency compensation.  J Acoust Soc Am.1980;67:306-317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Turner  CWCummings  KJ Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss.  Am J Audiol.1999;8:47-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Moore  BCJHuss  MVickers  DAGlasberg  BRAlcantara  JI A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.  Br J Audiol.2000;34:205-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Sullivan  JAAllsman  CSNielsen  LBMobley  JP Amplification for listeners with steeply sloping, high-frequency hearing loss.  Ear Hear.1992;13:35-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Hornsby  BWRicketts  TA The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding.  J Acoust Soc Am.2003;113:1706-1717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Stelmachowicz  PPittman  AHoover  BLewis  D The effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of /s/ in normal and hearing-impaired children and adults.  J Acoust Soc Am.2001;110:2183-2190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Stelmachowicz  PGPittman  ALHoover  BMLewis  DL Aided perception of /s/ and /z/ by hearing-impaired children.  Ear Hear.2002;23:316-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Cornelisse  LEGagné  JPSeewald  R Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech.  Ear Hear.1991;12:47-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Pittman  ALStelmachowicz  PGLewis  DEHoover  BM Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children.  J Speech Lang Hear Res.2003;46:649-657.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Grant  LBow  CPaatsch  LBlamey  P Comparison of production of /s/ and /z/ between children using cochlear implants and children using hearing aids.  In: Poster presented at: Ninth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology; December 2-5, 2002; Melbourne, Australia.
22.
Svirsky  MAStallings  LMLento  CLYing  ELeonard  LB Grammatical morphological development in pediatric cochlear implant users may be affected by the perceptual prominence of the relevant markers.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl.2002;189:109-112.Google Scholar
23.
MacArdle  BMWest  CBradley  JWorth  SMackenzie  JBellman  SC A study of the application of a frequency transposition hearing system in children.  Br J Audiol.2001;35:17-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
McDermott  HJDorkos  VPDean  MRChing  TY Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid.  J Speech Lang Hear Res.1999;42:1323-1335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
McDermott  HJKnight  MR Preliminary results with the AVR ImpaCt frequency-transposing hearing aid.  J Am Acad Audiol.2001;12:121-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Turner  CWHurtig  RR Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.  J Acoust Soc Am.1999;106:877-886.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Article
May 2004

The Importance of High-Frequency Audibility in the Speech and Language Development of Children With Hearing Loss

Author Affiliations

From the Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Neb. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):556-562. doi:10.1001/archotol.130.5.556
Abstract

Objectives  To review recent research studies concerning the importance of high-frequency amplification for speech perception in adults and children with hearing loss and to provide preliminary data on the phonological development of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants.

Design and Setting  With the exception of preliminary data from a longitudinal study of phonological development, all of the reviewed studies were taken from the archival literature. To determine the course of phonological development in the first 4 years of life, the following 3 groups of children were recruited: 20 normal-hearing children, 12 hearing-impaired children identified and aided up to 12 months of age (early-ID group), and 4 hearing-impaired children identified after 12 months of age (late-ID group). Children were videotaped in 30-minute sessions at 6- to 8-week intervals from 4 to 36 months of age (or shortly after identification of hearing loss) and at 2- and 6-month intervals thereafter. Broad transcription of child vocalizations, babble, and words was conducted using the International Phonetic Alphabet. A phoneme was judged acquired if it was produced 3 times in a 30-minute session.

Subjects  Preliminary data are presented from the 20 normal-hearing children, 3 children from the early-ID group, and 2 children from the late-ID group.

Results  Compared with the normal-hearing group, the 3 children from the early-ID group showed marked delays in the acquisition of all phonemes. The delay was shortest for vowels and longest for fricatives. Delays for the 2 children from the late-ID group were substantially longer.

Conclusions  The reviewed studies and preliminary results from our longitudinal study suggest that (1) hearing-aid studies with adult subjects should not be used to predict speech and language performance in infants and young children; (2) the bandwidth of current behind-the-ear hearing aids is inadequate to accurately represent the high-frequency sounds of speech, particularly for female speakers; and (3) preliminary data on phonological development in infants with hearing loss suggest that the greatest delays occur for fricatives, consistent with predictions based on hearing-aid bandwidth.

×