Physicians who care for critically ill children often do not know which babies are going to die. Even when experienced clinicians predict that a baby will die, they are often wrong.1 Clinicians must develop strategies to communicate with parents and to make decisions under conditions of significant prognostic uncertainty.
The study by Sanderson and colleagues2 shows that many physicians think that they do not do a good job at discussing do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. These physicians believe that DNR orders should be discussed early in the course of a child’s illness, before the child is acutely ill. They also believe that a DNR order should only mean that cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be withheld. A DNR order should not lead to other changes in treatment. Nevertheless, most of these clinicians discuss DNR orders with parents only when children are critically ill. Furthermore, they report that DNR orders often lead to the limitation or withdrawal of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions other than cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Clinicians apparently do not practice what they preach.
Lantos JD. Not Practicing What We Preach. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(10):899–900. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2495
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.