We call for a national effort to develop a parsimonious set of quality and outcome measures for children. The target users are health care organizations that are accountable for large pediatric populations. These organizations need an efficient set of measures that will direct them toward meaningful health improvement efforts and that capture the health care needs of their communities.
Currently, measure sets are primarily derived from administrative data and aimed at addressing disorders or processes rather than child well-being and outcomes. Claims-based measures have their place, but they only look at what clinicians get paid for and lack sufficient clinical detail. Measures focused on specific conditions and related processes are, likewise, essential. But the proliferation of these measures has created large reporting burdens with limited benefits. To that end, we discuss: (1) why we need a parsimonious set of quality and outcome measures, (2) why a distinctively pediatric solution is needed, (3) why community health measures are needed, and (4) how to move toward identifying this measure set.
Gardner W, Kelleher KJ. Core Quality and Outcome Measures for Pediatric Health. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):827–828. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1685
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: