A, Mortality and time to hospital discharge among trial participants. Mortality (orange lines) and hospital discharge (blue lines) in the solar-powered oxygen delivery group (solid lines) and cylinder oxygen comparator group (dashed lines) are modeled as competing risks. Differences between treatment arms were not statistically significantly different for mortality or time to hospital discharge. B, Rapid resolution of hypoxemia among trial participants. Immediate improvements in oxygen saturation were observed in both trial arms after administration of oxygen therapy, with no difference between patients receiving solar-powered oxygen (median change, 15% [interquartile range, 12%-21%]) and cylinder oxygen (median change, 15% [interquartile range, 11%-23%]). C, Time to wean off oxygen among trial participants. The median duration of oxygen therapy was similar in patients receiving solar-powered oxygen (2.6 days [interquartile range, 1.6-4.0 days]) and cylinder oxygen (2.1 days [interquartile range, 1.7-4.9 days]). A standardized protocol for stopping oxygen therapy was observed.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Hawkes MT, Conroy AL, Namasopo S, et al. Solar-Powered Oxygen Delivery in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(7):694–696. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0228
Oxygen is an essential medicine for life-threatening hypoxemic illnesses, including pneumonia, which is currently the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide.1,2 However, oxygen is not available in many pediatric wards in low-income countries. In a survey of 12 African countries, only 44% of 231 health centers, district hospitals, and provincial or general hospitals had access to oxygen on a continuous basis.3 Pragmatic solutions are needed to improve access to oxygen in low-resource settings.
In resource-constrained settings, compressed oxygen cylinders and oxygen concentrators are commonly used. Oxygen cylinders are ready to use and do not require any electricity; however, their availability may be compromised by weak stock management, the need for transportation from supplier to hospital, and leakage from ill-fitting regulators. Oxygen concentrators generate oxygen on site from ambient air through selective adsorption of nitrogen using aluminum silicate sieve beds. Concentrators overcome the logistical supply barriers of cylinder oxygen, require minimal service and maintenance, and are more user-friendly than cylinders. However, oxygen concentrators require a continuous and reliable source of electricity. A systematic review found that only 34% of hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa have reliable access to electricity.4 Interruptions in oxygen therapy owing to power outages are therefore frequent and potentially fatal in the settings in which most deaths from pneumonia occur.4
We tested a novel strategy, solar-powered oxygen delivery, which concentrates oxygen from ambient air using solar energy.5 We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of solar-powered oxygen delivery vs standard oxygen delivery using compressed oxygen cylinders among children younger than 13 years with hypoxemic illness at 2 resource-constrained hospitals in Uganda. The trial protocol and methods have previously been published6 (trial protocol in the Supplement) and the trial was registered (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02100865). The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of solar-powered oxygen delivery relative to oxygen cylinders, using a clinically meaningful end point, length of hospital stay, expressed as a continuous variable using the date and hour of admission and discharge, using a noninferiority margin of 1 day. The study was reviewed and approved by the Makerere University School of Biomedical Sciences Research Ethics Committee (REC Protocol SBS 139), the Uganda National Council on Science and Technology (Ref SS 3331), and the University Health Network Research Ethics Committee, Toronto, Canada (UHN REB No. 13-6168-AE). Parents of all patients provided written informed consent for participation in the study.
A total of 130 children (59 girls [45.4%] and 71 boys [54.6%]; mean [SD] age, 16  months) were enrolled between March 29, 2014, and May 13, 2015; of these, 65 (50.0%) were assigned to solar-powered oxygen delivery and 65 to cylinder oxygen. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (Table). The median length of hospital stay was 4.1 days (interquartile range, 2.9-5.6 days) in the solar-powered oxygen delivery group and 4.5 days (interquartile range, 3.3-6.9 days) in the cylinder oxygen group; the difference of medians was –0.41 days (95% CI, –1.2 to 0.43), meeting the prespecified criterion for noninferiority. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups: 11 patients (17%) in the solar-powered oxygen delivery group vs 8 patients (12%) in the cylinder oxygen group (risk difference, 4.6%; 95% CI, –7.8% to 17%). In a competing risk analysis with in-hospital mortality and hospital discharge as competing events, the time to discharge and mortality were not statistically different between groups (Figure, A). The increase in peripheral blood oxygen saturation (Figure, B), and the time to wean off oxygen were similar (Figure, C). Adverse events were similar in both groups.
Five episodes of battery depletion involving 7 patients required recharging the batteries of the solar-powered oxygen system using the hydroelectric grid or switching patients to the backup oxygen supply. Conversely, 4 patients randomized to receive cylinder oxygen were switched to the backup oxygen supply when cylinders stocks were depleted, despite our best efforts to maintain adequate stocks of cylinders.
Solar-powered oxygen delivery is noninferior to standard oxygen delivery using cylinders among African children hospitalized with hypoxemic illness. This technological innovation may be suitable for low-resource hospitals with pediatric inpatient services where the supply chain of cylinders and electrical power are not reliable. Solar-powered oxygen delivery addresses a critical gap in access to oxygen and has the potential for global consequences, given the magnitude of childhood pneumonia deaths, currently estimated at 900 000 per year.1
Accepted for Publication: January 23, 2018.
Corresponding Author: Michael T. Hawkes, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-588D Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada, (email@example.com).
Published Online: May 14, 2018. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0228
Author Contributions: Dr Hawkes had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Hawkes, Conroy, Namasopo, Kain, Opoka.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hawkes, Namasopo, Bhargava, Kain, Mian, Opoka.
Drafting of the manuscript: Hawkes, Namasopo.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hawkes, Conroy, Bhargava, Kain, Mian, Opoka.
Statistical analysis: Hawkes, Mian.
Obtained funding: Hawkes, Kain.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Hawkes, Conroy, Namasopo, Bhargava, Kain, Opoka.
Study supervision: Hawkes, Namasopo, Kain, Opoka.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Hawkes and Conroy and Ms Namasopo reported being listed as inventors on a provisional patent for Solar Powered Oxygen Delivery, owned by the Governors of the University of Alberta. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by grant S4 0206-01from Grand Challenges Canada (Dr Hawkes).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02100865