In the wake of the dramatic shifts in the landscape of digital media, there has been an uptick in research examining its putative consequences. In the public arena, the implications of this research have often been presented as consequential or trivial. Those who argue that there are consequential links between child “screen use” (ie, television, device or application use, and/or gaming) and delays or deficits in child developmental health (ie, physical, socioemotional, or cognitive)1,2 support the need for screen use guidelines to help moderate its use in children. Conversely, some researchers have argued that the magnitude of the associations is trivial3 and call for no limits on screen use. As is often the case in public discourse, these respective camps have become polarized and a moderate stance is lacking. That is, digital media is a remarkable and exciting tool for human advancement, but like many good things, it can also be problematic or harmful when used in certain ways.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Browne D, Thompson DA, Madigan S. Digital Media Use in Children: Clinical vs Scientific Responsibilities. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(2):111–112. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4559
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.