[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.240.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,156
Citations 0
Original Investigation
January 6, 2020

Evaluating the Placebo Status of Nebulized Normal Saline in Patients With Acute Viral Bronchiolitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
  • 3Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, New York
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Pediatr. Published online January 6, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5195
Key Points

Question  Does nebulized normal saline have an association with physiologic measures of respiratory status in patients with acute viral bronchiolitis?

Findings  This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with bronchiolitis treated with nebulized normal saline showed significant improvement in respiratory rate and respiratory score after therapy, although oxygen saturation remained unchanged. In addition, when compared with patients treated with other placebos, those treated with nebulized normal saline showed greater improvements in posttreatment respiratory scores.

Meaning  Nebulized normal saline may not be an inert placebo for patients with bronchiolitis and should be further studied to establish the clinical significance of any potential treatment outcome.

Abstract

Importance  In therapeutic trials for acute viral bronchiolitis, consistent clinical improvement in groups that received nebulized normal saline (NS) as placebo raises the question of whether nebulized NS acts as a treatment rather than a placebo.

Objective  To measure the short-term association of nebulized NS with physiologic measures of respiratory status in children with bronchiolitis by analyzing the changes in these measures between the use of nebulized NS and the use of other placebos and the changes before and after nebulized NS treatment.

Data Sources  MEDLINE and Scopus were searched through March 2019, as were bibliographies of included studies and relevant systematic reviews, for randomized clinical trials evaluating nebulized therapies in bronchiolitis.

Study Selection  Randomized clinical trials comparing children 2 years or younger with bronchiolitis who were treated with nebulized NS were included. Studies enrolling a treatment group receiving an alternative placebo were included for comparison of NS with other placebos.

Data Extraction and Synthesis  Data abstraction was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Fixed- and random-effects, variance-weighted meta-analytic models were used.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Pooled estimates of the association with respiratory scores, respiratory rates, and oxygen saturation within 60 minutes of treatment were generated for nebulized NS vs another placebo and for change before and after receiving nebulized NS.

Results  A total of 29 studies including 1583 patients were included. Standardized mean differences in respiratory scores for nebulized NS vs other placebo (3 studies) favored nebulized NS by −0.9 points (95% CI, −1.2 to −0.6 points) at 60 minutes after treatment (P < .001). There were no differences in respiratory rate or oxygen saturation comparing nebulized NS with other placebo. The standardized mean difference in respiratory score (25 studies) after nebulized NS was −0.7 (95% CI, −0.7 to −0.6; I2 = 62%). The weighted mean difference in respiratory scores using a consistent scale (13 studies) after nebulized NS was −1.6 points (95% CI, −1.9 to −1.3 points; I2 = 72%). The weighted mean difference in respiratory rate (17 studies) after nebulized NS was −5.5 breaths per minute (95% CI, −6.3 to −4.6 breaths per minute; I2 = 24%). The weighted mean difference in oxygen saturation (23 studies) after nebulized NS was −0.4% (95% CI, −0.6% to −0.2%; I2 = 79%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Nebulized NS may be an active treatment for acute viral bronchiolitis. Further evaluation should occur to establish whether it is a true placebo.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×