[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 297
Citations 0
Comment & Response
July 6, 2020

Perspectives on Urinary Tract Infection and Race

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Cornell Medicine, New York
  • 2Cornell Center for Health Equity, New York, New York
  • 3Department of Sociology, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
JAMA Pediatr. Published online July 6, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1162

In Reply We thank Cruz et al, Shaw et al, and Goza for their thoughtful response letters to our Viewpoint1 and this opportunity for important dialogue. We have great respect for the authors of these letters and their significant contributions to the field of pediatric emergency medicine.

It is critical to study race as a social determinant of health. However, situating it as a decision node in a guideline, requires discerning consideration. The JAMA User’s Guide to the Medical Literature states that guidelines “reflect value judgements about the relative importance of various health and economic outcomes” 2and emphasizes that “they should be required to pass unique tests about how matters of opinion, in addition to matters of science, are handled.”2 Historically, when race has appeared in a pediatric guideline, it has been positioned to ensure equitable care for high risk groups.3 However, this is not the case in the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) urinary tract infection (UTI) guideline, which systematically indicates differential care for black or nonwhite children based on a theoretical lower risk of UTI.4 Foundational studies conducted 20 years ago on the prevalence of UTI generated important information. However, we submit that framing these early findings as knowledge has led to fraught construct validity and uncertain applicability to children in the 21st century.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words