To the Editor We read with interest the article by Kidszun et al,1 which reported a clinical trial randomizing expectant mothers to higher (60%) vs lower (30%) numerical estimates of survival for a hypothetical infant born at a periviable gestation. The authors showed that the primary outcome, the mothers’ expressed preference for life-sustaining treatment or comfort care, did not depend on the numerical estimate provided.1 We would like to raise 2 points with respect to interpreting the authors’ findings.
Rysavy MA, Haward MF. Providing Neonatal Outcome Estimates as an Intervention. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(3):325. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5167
Artificial Intelligence Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.