[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Research Letter
December 28, 2020

Obesity and Eating Disorder Disparities Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), Bethesda, Maryland
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), Bethesda, Maryland
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), Bethesda, Maryland
JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(4):412-415. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5152

Obesity and eating disorders in youth are prevalent,1,2 are associated with medical and psychosocial consequences, and may persist into adulthood. Therefore, identifying subgroups of youth vulnerable to 1 or both conditions is critical. One group that may be at risk for obesity3 and disordered eating4 is sexual and gender minorities (SGM; those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender or whose sexual orientation and/or gender identity/expression do not conform to societal conventions).

Although SGM identities may develop in childhood5 and early adolescence,6 many studies assess older adolescents and adults and rely on self-reported weight and eating pathology. Given the adverse sequelae of obesity and eating disorders, the identification of disparities among SGM youth has implications for clinical practice and public health.

Methods

Participants (aged 9-10 years) were derived from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (https://abcdstudy.org/scientists/protocols/). Parents and children provided written consent and assent, respectively. Procedures for the current study were approved by Uniformed Services University institutional review board. Data were collected from September 2016 to August 2018.

Participants’ parents/guardians completed a demographic questionnaire, including family income and racial/ethnic identity. For the latter, parents/guardians selected the option(s) that best described their child. Height and weight were measured twice and averaged. Body mass index standardized scores were calculated using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth standards adjusting for age and sex; scores of 1.64 or higher indicated presence of obesity.

Children were queried via computerized questionnaire: “Are you gay or bisexual?” and “Are you transgender?” Response options were yes, maybe, no, and “I do not understand this question.” In accordance with prior convention, youths responding yes or maybe to either item were coded as probable SGM.

A computerized semistructured diagnostic interview (Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fifth Edition]) was administered to assess full-threshold and subthreshold (eg, other specified feeding or eating disorder) binge eating disorder, anorexia nervosa, and bulimia nervosa.

Outliers (<.2% of data points) were recoded to 3 SDs from the mean. Missing data (0.2%-1.3%) were handled using listwise deletion. Logistic regressions, adjusting for sex assigned at birth, age, race/ethnicity, and family income, were conducted to compare obesity and eating disorder prevalence by SGM status. IBM SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp) was used. Analysis began March 2020.

Results

There were 11 852 participants (mean [SD] age, 9.91 [0.62] years, 5672 [47.9%] female, 6094 [58.9%] non-Hispanic White) (Table 1). One in 6 youths (1987 [16.8%]) had obesity and 10.2% (n = 1188) had a full-threshold (86 [0.7%]) and/or subthreshold (1103 [9.4%]) eating disorder. The sample comprised 1.6% (n = 190) probable sexual (n = 151) and/or gender minority (n = 58) youths, of whom 24.7% (n = 47) responded yes and 75.3% (n = 143) responded maybe to the SGM queries. Adjusting for covariates, SGM youths were more likely to have obesity (odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.48) and full-threshold or subthreshold binge eating disorder (odds ratio, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.39-8.76) (Table 2). SGM and non-SGM youths did not differ in the likelihood of full-threshold or subthreshold anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. The same pattern of results remained when limiting SGM youths to those responding yes to the SGM items, although significance for the likelihood of obesity was attenuated.

Table 1.  Participant Demographics by SGM Status
Participant Demographics by SGM Status
Table 2.  Association of SGM Status With Obesity and Eating Disorders
Association of SGM Status With Obesity and Eating Disorders

Discussion

SGM youths were more likely to have obesity and full-threshold or subthreshold binge eating disorder compared with non-SGM peers. There were no differences in the likelihood of anorexia nervosa nor bulimia nervosa. Limitations include the possibility that SGM identities are not well-established during this period and, rather, continue to evolve in adolescence.6 Furthermore, eating disorders were not assessed with a specialized interview, Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (an age-relevant disorder) was not captured, and some eating disorder diagnoses had small cell counts. Findings suggest that weight3 and eating disorder4 disparities observed in SGM adolescents/adults may emerge in childhood; clinicians should consider assessing eating- and health-related behaviors among SGM youths. Prospective research with larger samples of SGM youths is needed to elucidate the mechanisms contributing to observed health disparities.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Natasha A. Schvey, PhD, Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USU), 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 (natasha.schvey@usuhs.edu).

Accepted for Publication: May 18, 2020.

Published Online: December 28, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5152

Author Contributions: Drs Schvey and Gray had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Schvey, Klein.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Schvey, Pearlman, Klein.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Schvey, Gray.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Schvey, Klein, Murphy.

Supervision: Klein.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of Uniformed Services University (USU) or the US Department of Defense.

Additional Information: Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (https://abcdstudy.org), held in the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive (NDA). This is a multisite, longitudinal study designed to recruit more than 10 000 children aged 9 to 10 years and follow-up with them over 10 years into early adulthood. The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners under award numbers U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA041048, U01DA041089, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041120, U01DA041134, U01DA041148, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U24DA041123, and U24DA041147. A full list of supporters is available at https://abcdstudy.org/federal-partners/. A listing of participating sites and a complete listing of the study investigators can be found at https://abcdstudy.org/principal-investigators.html. ABCD consortium investigators designed and implemented the study and/or provided data but did not necessarily participate in analysis or writing of this report. This article reflects the views of the authors and may not reflect the opinions or views of the National Institutes of Health or ABCD consortium investigators. The ABCD data repository grows and changes over time.

References
1.
Skinner  AC, Ravanbakht  SN, Skelton  JA, Perrin  EM, Armstrong  SC.  Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity in US children, 1999-2016.   Pediatrics. 2018;141(3):e20173459. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-3459PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Swanson  SA, Crow  SJ, Le Grange  D, Swendsen  J, Merikangas  KR.  Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: results from the national comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement.   Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(7):714-723. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.22PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Grammer  AC, Byrne  ME, Pearlman  AT, Klein  DA, Schvey  NA.  Overweight and obesity in sexual and gender minority adolescents: a systematic review.   Obes Rev. 2019;20(10):1350-1366. doi:10.1111/obr.12906PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Calzo  JP, Blashill  AJ, Brown  TA, Argenal  RL.  Eating disorders and disordered weight and shape control behaviors in sexual minority populations.   Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(8):49. doi:10.1007/s11920-017-0801-yPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Olson  KR, Key  AC, Eaton  NR.  Gender cognition in transgender children.   Psychol Sci. 2015;26(4):467-474. doi:10.1177/0956797614568156PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Calzo  JP, Masyn  KE, Austin  SB, Jun  HJ, Corliss  HL.  Developmental latent patterns of identification as mostly heterosexual versus lesbian, gay, or bisexual.   J Res Adolesc. 2017;27(1):246-253. doi:10.1111/jora.12266PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×