[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.202.44. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
July 1969

Histopathology of Gestational Rubella

Author Affiliations

Boston
From the departments of pathology and obstetrics and gynecology, Harvard Medical School, and Boston Hospital for Women (Lying-in Division), Boston.

Am J Dis Child. 1969;118(1):49-53. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1969.02100040051009
Abstract

MORE than two decades have elapsed since Gregg1 and Swan et al2 observed the relationship of antecedent maternal rubella infection during pregnancy to the birth of anomalous infants. Unequivocal diagnosis of rubella and its virological differentiation from other, clinically similar, diseases were first reported in 1962.3-5 The subsequent epidemics of 1963 and 1964 provided abundant evidence of the ravages of this infection among the unborn. In the laboratory, newly available diagnostic tools permitted an accurate recording of the extent and distribution of the disease, particularly its protean manifestations when rubella begins in utero. The classic postrubella syndrome of cataracts, cardiac anomalies, nerve deafness, and mental defect was expanded to comprise diverse anomalies. A persistent state of chronic antenatal infection also emerged which was reflected in viscera, neural, and osseous tissues, and often continued postnatally, throughout infancy.6

Mechanisms operative in rubella teratogenesis are not clear. The generalized

×