The failure of children to grow and develop on a nonorganic basis (variously known as failure to thrive, maternal deprivation, deprivarion dwarfism, etc) has been extensively studied. Results provide sufficient data to establish functional concepts concerning etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, manifestations, and sequels. While further studies will, no doubt, refine these concepts, I believe they are not of the highest priority.
See also p 24.
Studies of treatment have been inadequate. The few studies have been retrospective, consisting of descriptions and evaluations of outcomes of unplanned, unsystematic intervention. In these, the intervention is varied and details of critical aspects of the day-to-day handling of the child are not documentable; hence, valid conclusions cannot be drawn. Furthermore, appropriate controls have not been used.
Intervention studies have left unanswered three functional questions: (1) What factors should be used to determine whether a child should be removed from the parent(s)? (2) Do children have
WHITTEN CF. Failure to Thrive: Can Treatment be Effectively Investigated? Am J Dis Child. 1976;130(1):15. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1976.02120020017001
Monkeypox Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.