This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
In Reply.—I have reviewed the karyotype shown in Fig 3 and agree that the last pair of the C group is misplaced; it is indeed pair No. 8 rather than 12. Indeed, that pair should have been positioned between 7 and 9 rather than at the end of the C group. Fortunately, that regrettable error is of no consequence with respect to the conclusions drawn in our report. Despite the displacement in the C group, the C group is normal and the aneuploidy is as reported in the G group and sex chromosomes.
I wish to thank Chen and colleagues for bringing this matter to my attention.
TOWNES PL. Double Aneuploidy-Reply. Am J Dis Child. 1976;130(4):444. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1976.02120050102024
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: