[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
May 1979

Routine Circumcision

Am J Dis Child. 1979;133(5):557. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1979.02130050101024

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Sir.–Bravo to Dr Gellis for his "down... with... circumcision" marginal comment (Am J Dis Child 132:1168-1169, 1978). The anticircumcision campaign is widely accepted in medical circles now, with professional societies supporting it firmly. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Urological Association, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology have all come out against routine circumcision of the newborn. There are also nonprofessional groups such as INTACT that are lending vigorous support.

This poster adorns my consultation rooms: PRESERVE FREEDOM OF CHOICE—ABOLISH ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION. Our problem is in educating the public and especially the media. Apparently, some of them find "foreskin" on their list of obscene words.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×