• Few studies have been published about analgesic management practices during sickle cell pain crisis. Therefore, we reviewed the records of all hospitalized children with this complication during a recent five-year period. The 38 patients (98 painful episodes) who received intravenous narcotic therapy were the subjects of this review. In 76 patients, an initial intravenous bolus injection of morphine sulfate or meperidine hydrochloride was followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of one of these two drugs. To achieve adequate pain control, adjustments in infusion rates were made according to a written protocol. In 22 other patients, subsequent narcotic treatment consisted only of intermittent intravenous bolus injections of meperidine. Satisfactory pain relief was achieved in all 98 episodes. Patients given continuous infusions required more narcotic to control their pain and had more side effects than those treated with bolus injections alone, suggesting a dose-response relationship between narcotic dose and several known side effects. Common side effects included nausea and vomiting, lethargy, and abdominal distention. Although clinically evident respiratory depression was quite uncommon, chest syndrome was a frequent complication, and severe respiratory distress occurred in three patients. Narcotic withdrawal or addiction was not observed. With careful monitoring (including special attention directed to avoiding dosing error), continuous intravenous narcotic infusions are safe and provide effective pain relief for severe sickle cell pain crisis.
Cole TB, Sprinkle RH, Smith SJ, Buchanan GR. Intravenous Narcotic Therapy for Children With Severe Sickle Cell Pain Crisis. Am J Dis Child. 1986;140(12):1255–1259. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1986.02140260057025
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: