[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
April 1991

Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Pertussis Vaccine Litigation-Reply

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(4):425. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160040081006

In Reply.—The author did not wish to respond. I have a great deal of interest in this area, however, and thought that a response to Dr Lokietz' letter was important.

I do not agree with his assessment of the National Vaccine Compensation Program and its implementation. Having participated in the defense of physicians and others in vaccine-related litigation, I can attest to the harm that the tort-system handling of these claims has for everyone concerned. In my view, substitution of the compensation method for adjudicating claims of vaccine-induced injuries is a far better method than the adversarial legal method.

Initially, an agreement on what would be included in the Vaccine Injury Table,1 which is the source for determining the applicability of a given claim, was the only way that the system could work. That the table will need refinement in the future is clear. That not everyone accepts

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview