This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Van Howe and Cold are exactly correct when they say "the most important lesson to be learned from this tragedy [was that] consent was never given by the patient." We agree totally.
For our conclusions, however, we were limiting our advice for cases similar to the one presented. In cases of a penis loss, we advised that the child continue to be raised as a boy and refer the parents and child for appropriate and long-term counseling. Be honest as to what had occurred. This conservative management requires no statement of consent. We should have been clearer in our intimation that the long-term counselings extend until the child can cogently offer his input to surgery or sex reassignment. This should be at least until puberty has been reached and the patient has experienced conviction or doubt as to his sexual identity and has arrived at a sexual orientation (androphilic, gynecophilic,
Diamond M, Sigmundson HK. Sex Reassignment at Birth: Long-term Review and Clinical Implications-Reply. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(10):1062. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170470096022
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.