[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Aug 2012

Frequency of Parent-Supervised Outdoor Play of US Preschool-Aged Children

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(8):707-712. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1835

Objective To characterize preschoolers' daily parent-supervised outdoor play frequency and associated factors.

Design Cross-sectional using data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Birth Cohort.

Setting Nationally representative US sample.

Participants Preschool-aged children.

Main Outcome Measure Parent-reported outdoor play frequency.

Results The sample size of 8950 represented approximately 4 million children. Sixty percent of mothers worked outside the home, 79% exercised 0 to 3 days per week, and 93% perceived their neighborhood to be safe. Forty-four percent of mothers and 24% of fathers reported taking their child outside to play at least once per day. Fifty-one percent of children were reported to go outside to play at least once per day with either parent. Fifty-eight percent of children who were not in child care went outside daily. A child's odds of going outside daily were associated with sex (odds ratio [OR] for girls, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95), having more regular playmates (OR for ≥3 playmates, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.72-2.38), mother's race/ethnicity (OR for Asian, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.43-0.61; black, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.49-0.70; Hispanic, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.67-0.95), mother's employment (OR for full time, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.81), and parent's exercise frequency of 4 days or more per week (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.28-1.75). We did not find significant association of outdoor play with child's time spent watching television, household income, mother's marital status, or parent's perceptions of neighborhood safety.

Conclusions About half the preschoolers in this sample did not have even 1 parent-supervised outdoor play opportunity per day. Efforts to increase active outdoor play should especially target children who are girls and nonwhite. Outdoor play opportunities at child care are critical for children of parents who work outside the home.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that pediatric health care providers promote active, healthy living by documenting outdoor play frequency and encouraging “children to play outside as much as possible.”1 In part, that recommendation is based on the fact that being outdoors is a strong correlate of physical activity for children.2-5 Physical activity is protective against obesity in the preschool years,6,7 tracks through childhood,8,9 and has a protective effect against early adolescent adiposity,10 which is correlated with adult obesity.11 In addition, physical activity promotes cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and mental health, and it is associated with academic achievement.12-14

Preschool children's physical activity does not usually occur as a planned, structured activity. Instead, they have short bursts of vigorous activity that are followed by less-intense recovery periods.15,16 Young children are likely to achieve physical activity through play,17 which is also essential for their growth and development.18 In particular, outdoor play may also be beneficial for motor development, vision, cognition, vitamin D levels, and mental health.19-27 In spite of these manifold benefits, US children today likely spend less time playing outdoors than any previous generation.28-30

As society has changed, so has the way in which parents spend time with their children. Of all the adults who care for preschoolers, parents (or guardians) likely have the greatest influence on their behaviors because children spend the most time in their care.31 This is true even for children in child care, as preschoolers in the United States spend an average of 32 hours per week in child care.32 Therefore, parents' ability and willingness to take their children outdoors can influence children's opportunities for play and physical activity. Therefore, we conducted a study using nationally representative data with the following specific aims: (1) to quantify preschool-aged children's parent-supervised outdoor play frequency and (2) characterize children who are most at risk for less frequent parent-supervised outdoor time.


Study sample

We used data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study–Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), a longitudinal, observational study of a nationally representative sample of 10 700 children born in the United States in 2001. The same children were followed up and information was collected at approximately 9 months, 2 years, preschool (age 4 or a year away from kindergarten), and kindergarten age. The responding parent, usually the mother, was interviewed at each of those ages and, when possible, fathers who resided with the child were also interviewed separately.

At the preschool assessment, both the mother and father were asked about outdoor play frequency: “In the past month, how often did you take [child] outside for a walk or to play in yard, a park, or a playground?” Response categories were: “once a day or more,” “few times a week,” “few times a month,” “rarely,” or “not at all.”

The 9-month through preschool data are currently available through a restricted-use data license, which we obtained. This study was approved by the Seattle Children's Hospital institutional review board.


Our primary outcome variables were the frequencies with which mothers and fathers reported taking their child outdoors. Parent-reported outdoor play time has been found to correlate significantly with accelerometer-measured physical activity in preschool-aged children.33 Other variables considered for our analysis included those that might be expected to influence parent-supervised outdoor time based on previous research or a priori hypotheses. These variables included child-level variables (sex, number of playmates, time spent watching television at home [screen time], and child care arrangement), parent-level variables (mother's race/ethnicity, employment status, marital status, and responding parent's exercise frequency and perceptions of neighborhood safety), and household-level variables (highest educational attainment in household and household income). Parent-reported screen time has been found to be a valid measure of children's actual viewing time.34 There was no information about season or climate in the database.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software version 10.1 (StataCorp). As the data were collected based on a complex survey design, we weighted all analyses using sampling weights provided in the ECLS-B database for proper inference. All unweighted sample size numbers were rounded to the nearest 50 as required by the ECLS-B restricted-use data license. We conducted χ2 tests to examine differences in outdoor play frequency across various child, parent, and household characteristics. We fitted a multivariable logistic regression model and tested the significance of odds ratio estimates using the adjusted Wald test. In our final model, we adjusted for child's sex, number of regular playmates, screen time, type of primary child care arrangement, mother's race/ethnicity, mother's employment status/hours per week worked, parents' reported exercise frequency, and highest educational attainment in the household. Mother's marital status and parents' perception of neighborhood safety were not significantly associated with outdoor play frequency in bivariate and adjusted analyses; therefore, they were dropped from our final model. Household income was excluded owing to issues of colinearity with employment status and highest educational attainment in the household. Hours in child care was excluded owing to high colinearity with the mother's employment status, child care arrangements, and a large amount of missing values (22%). As a sensitivity analysis, we ran a model using multiple imputation with hours in child care instead of child care arrangement.


Characteristics of the child, parent(s), and household are shown in Table 1. By preschool age, more than 80% of children were in some type of nonparental care and spent an average of 28.5 hours per week in their primary child care arrangement. Children's average screen time of 3.78 hours per day has been previously reported and is higher than other estimates of about 2 hours per day for preschoolers.35,36 Most mothers in this sample worked outside the home, exercised 0 to 3 days per week, and perceived their neighborhood to be safe.

Table 1. Child, Parent(s), and Household Characteristics
Table 1. Child, Parent(s), and Household Characteristics
Table 1. Child, Parent(s), and Household Characteristics

Mothers took their children outside to play more often than fathers (Figure). Forty-four percent of mothers reported taking their child outside daily compared with 24% of fathers. Fifteen percent of mothers and 30% of fathers did not take their child outside to walk or play even a few times per week.

Figure. Frequency of children's outdoor play with their mother and father.

Figure. Frequency of children's outdoor play with their mother and father.

Table 2 shows the proportion of children who were reported to go outside at least once per day by child, parent, and household characteristics. Fifty-one percent of children were reported to go outside to walk or play at least once per day with a parent, either the mother or father. We found that 58% of children who did not have a regular child care setting or child care provider (beside their parent) went outside daily. Going outside at least once per day was associated with the child being male and having more regular playmates, as well as the mother's race/ethnicity and fewer hours worked per week, and parents' greater exercise frequency. We did not find a significant association of outdoor play frequency with the child's screen time, mother's marital status, household income, or parent perceptions of neighborhood safety. Children who went outside to play at least once per day spent a weekly average of 26.47 hours in child care compared with 30.54 hours for children who went outside less than once per day (P < .001).

Table 2. Proportion of Children Who Go Outside at Least Once per Day With a Parent by Various Characteristics of the Child, Parent(s), and Household
Table 2. Proportion of Children Who Go Outside at Least Once per Day With a Parent by Various Characteristics of the Child, Parent(s), and Household
Table 2. Proportion of Children Who Go Outside at Least Once per Day With a Parent by Various Characteristics of the Child, Parent(s), and Household

In adjusted analyses, girls had 15% lower odds of playing outside daily. Having 1 to 2 friends outside of school was associated with 36% greater odds and having 3 or more friends was associated with twice the odds of playing outside daily compared with children who did not have regular playmates (Table 3). Asian mothers had 49% lower odds, black mothers had 41% lower odds, and Hispanic mothers had 20% lower odds of taking their child outside daily compared with white mothers. Mothers who worked part time had 18% lower odds and mothers who worked full time had 30% lower odds of taking their child outside daily compared with mothers who did not work outside the home. Mothers who exercised 4 or more times per week had 50% greater odds of taking their child outside daily than mothers who did not report any exercise. Families for whom the highest educational attainment was more than high school all had lower odds of taking their child outside daily, as did children who attended home- or center-based child care compared with children in no nonparental care. Screen time was not statistically significantly associated with outdoor play in this regression analysis. In a logistic regression analysis using multiple imputation, we included weekly hours at child care instead of child care type and found that the other estimates were essentially unchanged and each additional hour in child care was associated with a 1% lower odd of going outside daily with a parent.

Table 3. Adjusted Odds of Going Outside at Least Daily With Parent(s) Based on Multivariable Logistic Regression for 8500 Children
Table 3. Adjusted Odds of Going Outside at Least Daily With Parent(s) Based on Multivariable Logistic Regression for 8500 Children
Table 3. Adjusted Odds of Going Outside at Least Daily With Parent(s) Based on Multivariable Logistic Regression for 8500 Children


On average, we found that about half of preschool children in this nationally representative sample are not being taken outside to play daily by either of their parents. For children who do not have a regular child care arrangement besides their parents (and therefore, likely do not have other structured venues or care providers to take them outside on a regular basis), 42% did not go outside daily.

Our study shows that preschool-aged girls have 16% lower odds of being taken outside by their parent(s). Parents may make more of an effort to take boys outside owing to societal expectations and norms, or boys may demand more outdoor time. One study of school-aged children found that parents encouraged boys to play outside significantly more than girls.37 The authors of that study also found that greater parental encouragement to spend time outdoors was positively associated with girls' time outdoors. Girls may also be perceived to have lower athletic ability than boys, therefore, they are taken outside to play less frequently. Loprinzi and Trost38 found that parents' perceptions of their children's physical competence was positively associated with parental support for physical activity, which was positively associated with preschoolers' physical activity at home. Previous research has shown there is a sex disparity in physical activity levels, with boys being more active than girls from a young age39-42 and substantial declines in girls' physical activity as they get older.43 One philosopher argued that “gendered standards of cleanliness” and play leave girls less exposed to microorganisms commonly found in outdoor environments and may be an explanation for the higher rates of atopic and autoimmune diseases in females.44 Given the association between outdoor time and physical activity and numerous potential other benefits, our findings support giving particular attention to the study and promotion of outdoor play for girls.

The significant association between hours in child care and mothers' employment status with daily parent-supervised outdoor play suggests that logistics and time are important barriers to children playing outside. Children of working parents are potentially going outdoors while at child care, which suggests the importance of outdoor physical activity opportunities in those settings. However, research suggests that activity levels at child care are quite low and preschoolers rarely achieve 60 minutes of recommended moderate-to-vigorous physical activity during the child care day.45 Parents may assume that their children went outside or were physically active at child care and may not prioritize those activities in the time they spend with their children. Furthermore, more than 40% of children without regular child care arrangements did not have daily parent-supervised outdoor play opportunities. These results suggest that all parents could benefit from strategies that help them provide their preschoolers with more active outdoor play opportunities. The association between the number of friends the child plays with regularly and outdoor play frequency suggests the potential importance of social and neighborhood factors. Perhaps tapping into social and community networks could help parents overcome some barriers to children's outdoor play.

The statistically significant race/ethnicity differences in outdoor play frequency may represent cultural differences that would need to be explored further. The finding that if the mother exercises 4 or more days per week, the child is more likely to go outside daily (when adjusted for the mother's employment status) supports the notion that there may be degrees of outdoor or physical activity tendencies in individuals and those may influence parents' own behavior and their support for their children's physical activities. Cleland et al37 concluded in a recent study that individual factors (indoor/outdoor “tendencies”) and social factors (eg, social opportunities, parental encouragement, and supervision) were more important predictors of school-aged children's outdoor time during 5 years than were physical environment factors (eg, facilities, play equipment, and weather). Future research on these individual and social characteristics, how they differ by sex, and the degree to which they are malleable could be important in promoting outdoor time and physical activity.

In one online survey study, 82 percent of mothers with 3- to 12-year olds cited safety concerns as one of the primary reasons children play outdoors less often today than in the past.28 However, the ECLS-B data did not support the notion that safety concerns were significant barriers to outdoor play for young children because most mothers stated they felt their neighborhood was very or fairly safe. Other studies have also found that perceptions of a more hazardous neighborhood by children or social disorder by parents were surprisingly not associated with less physical activity or outdoor time in children.46,47 In each of the previously mentioned studies, the populations studied are not necessarily comparable and the assessment of neighborhood conditions was done differently. Thus, perceptions of safety are complex constructs and study designs that lead to a better understanding of the true barriers to children's outdoor time and interventions to change them are needed.

In addition, consistent with previous findings but contrary to popular belief, we did not find evidence that excessive screen time is displacing outdoor activity.48,49 This supports the notion that active and sedentary behaviors are not necessarily inversely related and mediating variables need to be examined and targeted separately.50,51

There are some limitations to our study that warrant consideration. First, our outcome of outdoor play time was assessed with 1 survey question. Because the outcome was parent-reported, it may be subject to social desirability bias; however, we would expect that to lead to over-reporting of outdoor play time. Second, because the response options were categorical, we do not know the duration of time that children spent outside nor were we able to add the responses from the mother's to the father's to get a cumulative outdoor play frequency with both parents. Third, we did not have information about the season when the data were collected or about geographic differences, which are potentially important with regards to weather and outdoor time, although data were presumably collected throughout the year. Finally, despite the breadth of data available, it is possible that other unmeasured factors exist. However, the large sample size and complex sampling frame meant to capture a nationally representative group strengthen our conclusions and make the data more generalizable. Future studies that better quantify outdoor time, longitudinally examine the relationship between outdoor time and measured physical activity, and study other potential benefits of being outdoors would be important.

The National Association for Sport and Physical Education guidelines recommend at least 60 minutes of physical activity and up to several hours of unstructured play per day for preschoolers.52 While 3- to 5-year-old children tend to be more active than older children,17 studies suggest they are not as active as many people believe, and nearly half are not meeting these minimal physical activity recommendations.40,53-55 Influences on children's physical activity are multidimensional.5,56 A review of 24 articles on preschool-aged children showed that boys were more active than girls, children with active parents tended to be more active, and children who spent more time outdoors were more active than children who spent less time outdoors.56 An indeterminate result was found for weather conditions, television viewing, and ethnicity; economic status did not appear to be associated with children's physical activity. Thus, being outdoors may be among the most important modifiable factors for young children's physical activity. However, there is some evidence that merely providing more unstructured outdoor play time may be insufficient to increase children's physical activity.57 Social and environmental support factors, including parents' perceptions and behaviors, would need to be appropriately studied and targeted. Researchers have called for more research “to understand the high correlation between physical activity among preschoolers and outdoor playtime . . . to allow for more research-informed health promotion programs” to help young children meet National Association for Sport and Physical Education physical activity guidelines.55

Our results highlight the considerable room for improvement in parent-supervised outdoor play opportunities for preschool-aged children, which could have numerous benefits for young children's physical health and development. In particular, efforts are needed to increase active outdoor play in children who are girls and nonwhite. For children of parents who work outside the home, focusing efforts and interventions on preschools and child care providers becomes important and necessary.45,58 However, as parents are the most important role models and decision makers for their preschoolers, they need to be aided and empowered to provide ample outdoor active play opportunities for their young children. Pediatric clinicians are uniquely positioned to encourage outdoor time for children and families as well as advocate for policy changes that could increase outdoor play opportunities at home and in child care settings.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Pooja S. Tandon, MD, MPH, Seattle Children's Research Institute, M/S CW8-6, PO Box 5371, Seattle, WA 98145 (pooja@uw.edu).

Accepted for Publication: December 20, 2011.

Published Online: April 2, 2012. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1835

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Tandon, Zhou, and Christakis. Analysis and interpretation of data: Tandon and Zhou. Drafting of the manuscript: Tandon. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Tandon, Zhou, and Christakis. Statistical analysis: Tandon and Zhou. Obtained funding: Tandon and Christakis. Study supervision: Christakis.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development Mentored Scholars Program at Seattle Children's Research Institute.

Additional Contributions: We gratefully acknowledge Frederick Rivara, MD, for his comments on an earlier version of the article.

Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness; Council on School Health.  Active healthy living: prevention of childhood obesity through increased physical activity.  Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):1834-184216651347PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL,  et al.  Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool children.  Health Psychol. 1993;12(5):390-3988223363PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ferreira I, van der Horst K, Wendel-Vos W, Kremers S, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J. Environmental correlates of physical activity in youth: a review and update.  Obes Rev. 2007;8(2):129-15417300279PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cleland V, Crawford D, Baur LA, Hume C, Timperio A, Salmon J. A prospective examination of children's time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight.  Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(11):1685-169318852701PubMedGoogle Scholar
Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(5):963-97510795788PubMedGoogle Scholar
Reilly JJ. Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and energy balance in the preschool child: opportunities for early obesity prevention.  Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67(3):317-32518700053PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dietz WH. Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(5):955-9598172099PubMedGoogle Scholar
Janz KF, Dawson JD, Mahoney LT. Tracking physical fitness and physical activity from childhood to adolescence: the muscatine study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(7):1250-125710912890PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kelder SH, Perry CL, Klepp K-I, Lytle LL. Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors.  Am J Public Health. 1994;84(7):1121-11268017536PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moore LL, Gao D, Bradlee ML,  et al.  Does early physical activity predict body fat change throughout childhood?  Prev Med. 2003;37(1):10-1712799124PubMedGoogle Scholar
Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? a review of the literature.  Prev Med. 1993;22(2):167-1778483856PubMedGoogle Scholar
Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ,  et al.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.  J Pediatr. 2005;146(6):732-73715973308PubMedGoogle Scholar
Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7(1):4020459784PubMedGoogle Scholar
Trost S. Active Education: Physical Education, Physical Activity And Academics Performance. Princeton, New Jersey: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2007
Bailey RC, Olson J, Pepper SL, Porszasz J, Barstow TJ, Cooper DM. The level and tempo of children's physical activities: an observational study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27(7):1033-10417564970PubMedGoogle Scholar
Benham-Deal T. Preschool children's accumulated and sustained physical activity.  Percept Mot Skills. 2005;100(2):443-45015974355PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini AD, Smith PK. Physical activity play: the nature and function of a neglected aspect of playing.  Child Dev. 1998;69(3):577-5989680672PubMedGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg KR.American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Communications; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health.  The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds.  Pediatrics. 2007;119(1):182-19117200287PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hug SM, Hartig T, Hansmann R, Seeland K, Hornung R. Restorative qualities of indoor and outdoor exercise settings as predictors of exercise frequency.  Health Place. 2009;15(4):971-98019427807PubMedGoogle Scholar
Florez H, Martinez R, Chacra W, Strickman-Stein N, Levis S. Outdoor exercise reduces the risk of hypovitaminosis D in the obese.  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103(3-5):679-68117267209PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kuo FE, Taylor AF. A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a national study.  Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1580-158615333318PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fjortoft I. The natural environment as a playground for children: the impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children.  Early Child Educ J. 2001;29:111-118Google Scholar
Little H, Wyver S. Outdoor play: does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits?  Aust J Early Child. 2008;33(2):33-40Google Scholar
Burdette HL, Whitaker RC. Resurrecting free play in young children: looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation, and affect.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(1):46-5015630057PubMedGoogle Scholar
Dirani M, Tong L, Gazzard G,  et al.  Outdoor activity and myopia in Singapore teenage children.  Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(8):997-100019211608PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jones LA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Parental history of myopia, sports and outdoor activities, and future myopia.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(8):3524-353217652719PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J,  et al.  Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence of myopia in children.  Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1279-128518294691PubMedGoogle Scholar
Clements R. An investigation of the status of outdoor play.  Contemp Issues Early Child. 2004;5(1):68-80Google Scholar
Hofferth SL, Sandberg JF. How American children spend their time.  J Marriage Fam. 2001;63(2):295-308Google Scholar
Oliver SJ, Klugman E. Play and the outdoors: what's new under the sun?  Exchange. 2005;164(164):6-10Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.  Early Childhood Obesity Prevention Policies. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2011
Laughlin L. Who's Minding The Kids? Child Care Arrangements: Spring 2005/Summer 2006. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2010
Burdette HL, Whitaker RC, Daniels SR. Parental report of outdoor playtime as a measure of physical activity in preschool-aged children.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(4):353-35715066875PubMedGoogle Scholar
Anderson DR, Field DE, Collins PA, Lorch EP, Nathan JG. Estimates of young children's time with television: a methodological comparison of parent reports with time-lapse video home observation.  Child Dev. 1985;56(5):1345-13574053746PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tandon PS, Zhou C, Lozano P, Christakis DA. Preschoolers' total daily screen time at home and by type of child care.  J Pediatr. 2011;158(2):297-30020980020PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rideout V, Hamel E.Kaiser Family Foundation.  The Media Family: Electronic Media In The Lives Of Infants, Toddlers, Preschoolers, And Their Parents. Menlo Park, California: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation;2006
Cleland V, Timperio A, Salmon J, Hume C, Baur LA, Crawford D. Predictors of time spent outdoors among children: 5-year longitudinal findings.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64(5):400-40619778909PubMedGoogle Scholar
Loprinzi PD, Trost SG. Parental influences on physical activity behavior in preschool children.  Prev Med. 2010;50(3):129-13319962397PubMedGoogle Scholar
Whitt-Glover MC, Taylor WC, Floyd MF, Yore MM, Yancey AK, Matthews CE. Disparities in physical activity and sedentary behaviors among US children and adolescents: prevalence, correlates, and intervention implications.  J Public Health Policy. 2009;30:(suppl 1)  S309-S33419190581PubMedGoogle Scholar
Pate RR, Pfeiffer KA, Trost SG, Ziegler P, Dowda M. Physical activity among children attending preschools.  Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1258-126315520105PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cardon G, Van Cauwenberghe E, Labarque V, Haerens L, De Bourdeaudhuij I. The contribution of preschool playground factors in explaining children's physical activity during recess.  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:1118302741PubMedGoogle Scholar
Finn K, Johannsen N, Specker B. Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children.  J Pediatr. 2002;140(1):81-8511815768PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kimm SYS, Glynn NW, Kriska AM,  et al.  Decline in physical activity in black girls and white girls during adolescence.  N Engl J Med. 2002;347(10):709-71512213941PubMedGoogle Scholar
Clough S. Gender and the hygiene hypothesis.  Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(4):486-49321195519PubMedGoogle Scholar
Larson N, Ward DS, Neelon SB, Story M. What role can child-care settings play in obesity prevention? a review of the evidence and call for research efforts.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(9):1343-136221872698PubMedGoogle Scholar
Romero AJ, Robinson TN, Kraemer HC,  et al.  Are perceived neighborhood hazards a barrier to physical activity in children?  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(10):1143-114811576010PubMedGoogle Scholar
Burdette HL, Whitaker RC. A national study of neighborhood safety, outdoor play, television viewing, and obesity in preschool children.  Pediatrics. 2005;116(3):657-66216140705PubMedGoogle Scholar
Vandewater EA, Bickham DS, Lee JH. Time well spent? relating television use to children's free-time activities.  Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):e181-e19116452327PubMedGoogle Scholar
Christakis DA, Zimmerman FJ. The Elephant. In: The Living Room: Make Television Work For Your Kids. New York, New York: Rodale; 2006
Marshall SJ, Biddle SJH, Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL. Clustering of sedentary behaviors and physical activity among youth: a cross-national study.  Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2002;14:401-417Google Scholar
Fairclough SJ, Boddy LM, Hackett AF, Stratton G. Associations between children's socioeconomic status, weight status, and sex, with screen-based sedentary behaviours and sport participation.  Int J Pediatr Obes. 2009;4(4):299-30519922045PubMedGoogle Scholar
National Association For Sport and Physical Education.  Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines For Children Birth To Five Years. Reston, Virginia: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2002
Reilly JJ, Jackson DM, Montgomery C,  et al.  Total energy expenditure and physical activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study.  Lancet. 2004;363(9404):211-21214738795PubMedGoogle Scholar
Fisher A, Reilly JJ, Kelly LA,  et al.  Fundamental movement skills and habitual physical activity in young children.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(4):684-68815809570PubMedGoogle Scholar
Tucker P. The physical activity levels of preschool-aged children: a systematic review.  Early Child Res Q. 2008;23:547-558Google Scholar
Hinkley T, Crawford D, Salmon J, Okely AD, Hesketh K. Preschool children and physical activity: a review of correlates.  Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(5):435-44118407012PubMedGoogle Scholar
Alhassan S, Sirard JR, Robinson TN. The effects of increasing outdoor play time on physical activity in Latino preschool children.  Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2(3):153-15817852547PubMedGoogle Scholar
Trost SG, Ward DS, Senso M. Effects of child care policy and environment on physical activity.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(3):520-52520068496PubMedGoogle Scholar