Potential Nutritional and Economic Effects of Replacing Juice With Fruit in the Diets of Children in the United States | Lifestyle Behaviors | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
May 2012

Potential Nutritional and Economic Effects of Replacing Juice With Fruit in the Diets of Children in the United States

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Monsivais and Mr Rehm); and UK Clinical Research Collaboration Centre for Diet and Activity Research, Cambridge, England (Dr Monsivais).

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(5):459-464. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1599

Objective To estimate the nutritional and economic effects of substituting whole fruit for juice in the diets of children in the United States.

Design Secondary analyses using the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and a national food prices database. Energy intakes, nutrient intakes, and diet costs were estimated before and after fruit juices were completely replaced with fruit in 3 models that emphasized fruits that were fresh, inexpensive, and widely consumed and in a fourth model that partially replaced juice with fruit, capping juice at recommended levels.

Setting A nationwide, representative sample of children in the United States.

Participants A total of 7023 children aged 3 to 18 years.

Main Exposures Systematic complete or partial replacement of juice with fruit.

Main Outcome Measures Difference in energy intakes, nutrient intakes, and diet costs between observed and modeled diets.

Results For children who consumed juice, replacement of all juice servings with fresh, whole fruit led to a projected reduction in dietary energy of 233 kJ/d (−2.6% difference [95% CI, −5.1% to −0.1%]), an increase in fiber of 4.3 g/d (31.1% difference [95% CI, 26.4%-35.9%]), and an increase in diet cost of $0.54/d (13.3% difference [95% CI, 8.8%-17.8%]).

Conclusions Substitution of juice with fresh fruit has the potential to reduce energy intake and improve the adequacy of fiber intake in children's diets. This would likely increase costs for schools, childcare providers, and families. These cost effects could be minimized by selecting processed fruits, but fewer nutritional gains would be achieved.

One hundred percent fruit juice (FJ) makes up a substantial part of the total fruit intakes of children and is a major contributor to their total nutrient intake.1 However, FJs have energy densities similar to sugar-sweetened beverages and might contribute to excess energy intake,2 obesity,3 and weight gain.4 The evidence linking FJ with obesity is mixed, a point that was acknowledged by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.5 Nevertheless, the 2010 Dietary Guidelines recommended that no more than half of total fruit servings be in the form of FJ, based on the suggestion that whole fruits confer greater health benefits.

This recommendation placed the Dietary Guidelines in line with previous recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics to limit FJs and encourage fruit.6 Those recommendations drove the suggested changes to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, which reduced the availability of FJ and introduced a fruit and vegetable benefit.7 More recently, the Institute of Medicine recommendations for improving school meals8 and the Child and Adult Care Food Program9 both prioritized whole fruit over FJ.

Little quantitative information exists about the potential nutritional effects of substituting fruit for FJ in the diets of children under current eating patterns. Substituting whole fruit for FJ might reduce the energy content of the diet while increasing the intake of fiber.10-12 Substitution might also drive up food costs, given that FJs are often more affordable than fresh fruits.13 Thus, the complete substitution of whole fruit for juice has the potential to substantially change and improve the nutrient intakes of children while at the same time increasing costs for schools, childcare providers, and families. Accordingly, nutrition recommendations and policies need to take into account potential costs and benefits. Our study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to examine the potential nutritional benefits and economic costs of substituting fruit for FJ in the diets of US children.



Our analyses were based on children and adolescents (3-18 years of age) who completed a valid 24-hour recall during either of 2 cycles of the NHANES: from 2001 to 2002 and from 2003 to 2004. We analyzed these 2 cycles of NHANES because they allowed us to link quantities of foods and beverages consumed to MyPyramid equivalent servings. These releases also allowed us to link each food and beverage consumed with nationally representative food prices, through a database described below. Adolescent girls who were pregnant, based on self-report or a positive pregnancy test result, were excluded (n = 70). The use of this existing, publicly available data set did not qualify as “human subjects research” and was exempt from human subjects review by the University of Washington institutional review board.

Dietary assessment in nhanes

All examined survey participants are eligible to participate in the dietary interview, the protocol and methods of which are fully documented elsewhere.14 Dietary intakes were based on a single 24-hour dietary recall. The NHANES staff monitored interviewers and developed criteria to determine the acceptability of each recall.10

For children 12 years or older, the primary source of dietary recall information was the child, but these children could be assisted by an adult who had knowledge of their diet. For children 6 to 11 years of age, the primary respondent was the child, but a proxy was present and able to assist. For children younger than 6 years, dietary recall interviews were conducted by proxy.10

Fj classification

We identified FJs from the individual foods file, defining them as beverages with a 1-digit US Department of Agriculture prefix code of 6 (US Department of Agriculture fruit category), which contained the word “juice” in their short description and that contained no added sugars from the MyPyramid Equivalents database. Fruit nectars and vinegars, sugar-sweetened fruit drinks, and FJ drinks are included in the US Department of Agriculture fruit food grouping but were not defined as FJs in the present analysis. Fruit juice servings less than 60 g (approximately 2 fl oz [60 mL]) were excluded from the analysis because such small servings may be used in recipes and are not likely to represent opportunities for substitution. This exclusion eliminated 32 instances of juice consumption by children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years.

Diet cost

The methods for deriving the monetary cost of diets in the NHANES rely on merging the dietary recalls with nationally representative food prices released by the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion.15 The analytic procedures have been described previously.16 We computed the diet cost from each individual's dietary recall by multiplying the price per gram with the portion of each food consumed by the respondent and then summing these values for each participant. Diet cost estimations were based on all foods and beverages reported, excluding tap water, bottled water, and alcoholic beverages.

Substitution models

The key feature of our study was the systematic replacement of FJ with fruit under 4 different scenarios. Fresh and prepared fruits (including canned, frozen, and dried options) were eligible for substitution in place of FJ. Prepared fruits containing added sugars were not eligible for inclusion. In some cases, this exclusion removed frequently consumed canned and frozen fruits (eg, canned peaches in syrup). The quantity of fruit used in the substitution models was dependent on the quantity of FJ reported in the recall. All 4 substitution models replaced FJs with equal portion sizes of fruit using MyPyramid equivalents of fruit servings.17 It should be noted that the weight of MyPyramid servings varied depending on the food or beverage. For example, a single MyPyramid fruit serving of fresh, raw apple is 106 g, whereas the same serving of raw orange is 184 g.

The first 3 models replaced all servings of FJ with fruit, differing only on the type of fruit that was substituted. The first model replaced each FJ with the fresh, intact form of the same or similar fruit (eg, apple for apple juice). For mixed FJs with specified ingredients, the first ingredient was used. For mixed FJs with nonspecified ingredients or juices without a relevant fresh equivalent, such as cranberry juice, apples were used because apples are both an important ingredient in blended FJ and the most frequently consumed whole fruit. The second model recognized economic constraints and identified the lowest cost equivalent of the FJ consumed. The lowest cost option was identified in the food prices database as the lowest cost per gram. Examples include applesauce (no sugar added) for apple juice or canned oranges for orange juice. In some cases (eg, grapes), the replacements for the first 2 models were the same. A third model recognized social norms, by substituting each FJ serving with the most frequently consumed raw fruits: apple, orange, or banana. Each FJ serving was randomly assigned one of these replacements at a 1/3 probability.

A fourth model only replaced servings of FJ that were in excess of amounts recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.6 This value was 4 fl oz for young children (aged 3-6 years) and 8 fl oz for older children (aged ≥7 years). Energy and nutrients were included from the FJ up to the amount allowed. Random allocations of apple, orange, and banana were applied to the excess amount of FJ consumed. The random allocations were used because many children consumed different types of juice. The features of the 4 models are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Example Substitutions of Fruit for Fruit Juice in Each of the 4 Modelsa
Table 1. Example Substitutions of Fruit for Fruit Juice in Each of the 4 Modelsa
Table 1. Example Substitutions of Fruit for Fruit Juice in Each of the 4 Modelsa

Outcome measures and statistical analysis

The population effects of substitution were examined for all children and separately for juice consumers (children consuming ≥60 g on their recall day). Survey-weighted means were estimated for diet composition and cost for the observed data and the 4 substitution models. Age-specific models were also evaluated using 3 age groups (3-5, 6-11, and 12-18 years). Diet composition effects of substitution were quantified for energy (kilojoules), dietary weight (grams), and 4 nutrients. Three of the nutrients (dietary fiber, potassium, and calcium) are shortfall nutrients in the diets of children.5 Vitamin D is also a shortfall nutrient but was not available in the nutrient database linked to these releases of NHANES. Although not a shortfall nutrient among children, vitamin C effects were also examined because FJs are an important source for this nutrient.18

We focused our statistical analyses on determining whether the substitution models resulted in a substantive change in nutrient intake. This approach was used because the nature of our models imposed a change in nutrient intake and diet cost. For nutrients, a 10% daily value threshold was used to represent a change of public health significance (2.5 g for fiber, 350 mg for potassium, 100 mg for calcium, and 6 mg for vitamin C). A 10% change in cost was the threshold value for diet cost. For energy, there is little consensus on what warrants a substantive change; therefore, model effects were reported, and no hypothesis testing was performed. A survey-weighted Wald test was used for all statistical testing following the estimation of survey-weighted means. This approach fully accounted for the complex nature of NHANES data. All analyses used Stata version 11.0 (StataCorp).


Sample characteristics

Valid dietary recalls were available for 7023 of the 7756 respondents aged 3 to 18 years over both survey cycles. The characteristics of the weighted sample for all 7023 respondents are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Demographic Characteristics of Children in 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Table 2. Demographic Characteristics of Children in 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Table 2. Demographic Characteristics of Children in 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Consumption of 100% fj

For the single 24-hour recall, at least 1 serving (>60 g) was reported by 33.4% of the total child sample across both survey years; 17.8% of children consumed more than the recommended amounts of FJ (4 fl oz [120 mL] for those 3-6 years of age and 8 fl oz [240 mL] for those ≥7 years of age). For all children 3 to 18 years of age, FJs accounted for 46% of MyPyramid servings of total fruit in the diet. The share varied by age, with FJ contributing 49%, 44%, and 46% of the total fruit servings for children 3 to 5, 6 to 11, and 12 to 18 years, respectively. The mix of 100% FJs consumed was dominated by a few varieties, with orange, apple, unspecified FJ blends, and grape accounting for 52.6%, 27.5%, 10.0%, and 5.7% of all juices consumed, respectively (95.8% total). Mixed vegetable juice, carrot juice, and tomato juice made up only 1.1% of all juices combined.

Substitution effects on energy and nutrient intakes

For the overall sample of children, all substitution models lowered dietary energy and dietary mass. Fiber was increased in all 4 models, but vitamin C, potassium, and calcium were reduced to varying extents. The results of the 4 models and the observed dietary characteristics for the overall sample are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Observed and Projected Differences for Energy, Nutrients, and Diet Costs Among Children in the United Statesa
Table 3. Observed and Projected Differences for Energy, Nutrients, and Diet Costs Among Children in the United Statesa
Table 3. Observed and Projected Differences for Energy, Nutrients, and Diet Costs Among Children in the United Statesa

Model 1, in which FJ was substituted with the fresh fruit equivalent, showed the largest reduction of energy. For children who had reported consuming FJ, model 1 showed a mean reduction in energy intake of 2.6% compared with observed diets. Model 2, the cost-sensitive substitution, showed the weakest energy effects, with a reduction of 0.9% compared with observed diets. Fiber effects showed a similar hierarchy across models, with the largest increase in model 1 (31.1%) and a more moderate increase in model 2 (25.5%). Model 4 had the smallest increase in fiber among juice consumers (13%). Across the 4 models, vitamin C was reduced by small amounts in model 1 (−7.1%) and model 4 (−8.3%) and by the greatest amount in model 3 (−23.3%). However, the trend was reversed for potassium, which was reduced the least in model 4 (−1.5%) and model 3 (−3.3%) and was reduced the most in model 1 (−7.1% difference from observed diets), owing to the inclusion of bananas in models 3 and 4. Model 2 affected calcium intake the most (−4.0%), and model 4 affected it the least (−0.9%), relative to observed diets.

We further examined the effects of model 1 on 3 age strata of children who consumed FJ (3-5, 6-11, and 12-18 years). Results for model 1 across the 3 age groups did not differ markedly. The largest effect on dietary energy, in terms of percentage change, was observed in children 3 to 5 years of age, resulting in a mean change of −248 kJ/d (−3.3%) in total dietary energy. Effects were smallest for children 12 to 18 years of age, who showed a −2.3% change. Fiber effects were largest for children 12 to 18 years of age (34.9%) and smallest for children 6 to 11 years of age (27.5%).

Substitution effects on diet cost

All of the substitution models resulted in an increase in estimated diet cost. Of the 4 models, model 1 showed the largest monetary effects, with a 13.3% increase in diet cost per day relative to observed diets. Model 2 was specifically designed to minimize the monetary impact of switching from FJ to fruit, resulting in a 1.5% increase. Model 3 showed intermediate effects, with a 6.9% increase in diet cost. Model 4 showed an increase in cost of 3.7%.

The age-specific effects on diet cost differed across the 3 age strata. Implementing model 1 for children 12 to 18 years of age brought the largest increase in diet cost (17.1%). The effects of model 1 on diet cost were smallest for children 3 to 5 years of age (10.0%).


The diet simulations presented indicate that replacing all servings of FJs with fruit has the potential to reduce energy intake and increase intakes of dietary fiber. These findings are consistent with previous analyses commissioned by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, which showed that replacing FJs with fruit reduced the content of energy and some nutrients in model food patterns.12 Based on the present findings, replacing FJ with a variety of fresh, whole fruit (model 1) would have the greatest impact on energy intake, resulting in a reduction in energy intake of 233 kJ (56 kcal) per day. Such a reduction, if sustained, could translate to a reduction in body weight of more than 2.3 kg (5 lb) per year, assuming no compensatory increases in energy intake from other sources.19 This assumption might be realistic given that fresh, whole fruits are low in energy density and high in fiber and are associated with greater satiety than FJ.11,20 This projected energy reduction is roughly half of the estimated 460 kJ (110 kcal) excess in energy intake driving weight gain in children.21

Weight and weight gain in children and adolescents were not systematically associated with FJ consumption, according to a recent, comprehensive review.22 Irrespective of body weight associations, the intake of FJs has been associated with higher overall dietary energy intake,2 and based on data from 1999-2004 NHANES, FJs contributed between 7% and 9% to the total dietary energy intakes of children who reported consuming FJ.23 Replacing FJs with fruit could potentially reduce overall energy intake.

However, this replacement can also reduce intakes of potassium and vitamin C. Vitamin C was not identified as a shortfall nutrient for children by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, and our analyses indicated that the mean and median levels of consumption for FJ consumers exceeded the dietary reference intake (25-75 mg). Children did fall short of recommended intakes for potassium, and replacing FJ with fruit led to a greater shortfall for this nutrient. The intake of potassium decreased because the most frequently consumed FJs (eg, orange juice and apple juice) contained significantly more potassium per serving than fruits used to replace these juices.

Replacing FJ with fruit in our models also led to higher diet costs. Cost is one of several factors that may explain the preponderance of FJ in the diets of children. In 2004-2005, FJs and juice drinks made up more than half of the MyPyramid fruit servings for children.24 Fresh, whole fruit and fresh produce, in general, are among the most costly sources of dietary energy,25 and FJs provide a lower cost per serving and more nutrients per dollar than many fresh fruits.13

Among the 3 full replacement models (models 1-3), food costs were best controlled in model 2, which relied on the lowest-cost fruit equivalent of each FJ serving reported. The fruits in this model were typically canned or otherwise processed, indicating that these options provide an avenue for institutions and families to switch from FJ to fruit while respecting cost constraints. However, it should be noted that model 2 resulted in the smallest decrease in energy, an increase in fiber, and the largest decrease in calcium.

A minimal cost effect was also observed in model 4, which conformed to recommendations for limits on FJ from the American Academy of Pediatrics.6 Although this scenario generally resulted in the smallest reduction in nutrient intakes relative to observed diets, it also produced the smallest reduction in energy.

Our study had a number of limitations. First, the effects of FJ substitution on dietary intakes are entirely projected, based on systematic complete or partial replacement of 100% FJs with fruit, with quantities scaled using MyPyramid portion sizes. As such, our findings represent an estimation of the maximal efficacy of implementing recommendations to replace FJ with fruit. Implementation of nutrition recommendations is often most feasible within institutions such as schools and child care settings. Based on the 2003-2004 NHANES, approximately 9% of fruit servings from FJ were from school cafeteria or child care settings, indicating that replacing juice with fruit only in these settings is not likely to have a substantial impact at the population level. A second limitation is that our models did not explore other potential substitution scenarios that might have also improved nutrition. For example, replacing juice drinks and other sugar-sweetened beverages with fruit would further reduce total energy intake while reducing consumption of added sugars. Third, the monetary cost of substituting fruit for FJ was based on a single, nationally representative database of food prices that could not account for regional variations in food prices26 and, hence, differences in the cost of making the substitutions described herein. Finally, other factors that might favor FJs over fruit were not taken into account in these models.

Other factors that might drive a preference for FJs over fruit include ease of storage, preparation, and portioning for institutions such as schools and child care centers27 and the cost of wasting overripe fruit. Fruit juices may be more convenient for parents and caregivers who have little time to prepare food and who look for easy and quick options.28,29

Complete replacement of FJ with a variety of whole, fresh fruits has the potential to reduce the dietary energy intake and increase the intake of dietary fiber among children. These benefits might come at the cost of lower intakes of some vitamins and minerals and higher food costs. Studies using national surveillance data may be useful in assessing the potential benefits and costs of dietary recommendations and nutrition policies.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Pablo Monsivais, PhD, MPH, UK Clinical Research Collaboration, Centre for Diet and Activity Research, PO Box 296, Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England (pm491@medschl.cam.ac.uk).

Accepted for Publication: November 11, 2011.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Monsivais and Rehm. Analysis and interpretation of data: Monsivais and Rehm. Drafting of the manuscript: Monsivais and Rehm. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Monsivais and Rehm. Statistical analysis: Monsivais and Rehm. Obtained funding: Monsivais and Rehm. Administrative, technical, and material support: Monsivais. Study supervision: Monsivais.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This research was commissioned by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Healthy Eating Research Program and was supported by grant 1R21DK085406 from the National Institutes of Health.

O’Neil CE, Nicklas TA, Zanovec M, Fulgoni VL III. Diet quality is positively associated with 100% fruit juice consumption in children and adults in the United States: NHANES 2003-2006.  Nutr J. 2011;10:1721314991PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
O’Connor TM, Yang SJ, Nicklas TA. Beverage intake among preschool children and its effect on weight status.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):e1010-e101817015497PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Dennison BA, Rockwell HL, Baker SL. Excess fruit juice consumption by preschool-aged children is associated with short stature and obesity.  Pediatrics. 1997;99(1):15-228989331PubMedGoogle Scholar
Faith MS, Dennison BA, Edmunds LS, Stratton HH. Fruit juice intake predicts increased adiposity gain in children from low-income families: weight status-by-environment interaction.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):2066-207517079580PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
US Dept of Health and Human Services.  Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. US Dept of Health and Human Services website. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2010-PolicyDocument.htm. Accessed February 22, 2012
Committee on Nutrition.  American Academy of Pediatrics: the use and misuse of fruit juice in pediatrics.  Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):1210-121311331711PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Committee to Review the WIC Food Packages, Food and Nutrition Board.  WIC Food Packages: Time for a Change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005
Institute of Medicine; Committee on Nutrition Standards for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs.  School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children. Stallings VA, Suitor CW, Taylor CL, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009
Committee to Review Child and Adult Care Food Program Meal Requirements; Institute of Medicine.  Child and Adult Care Food Program: Aligning Dietary Guidance for All. Murphy SP, Yaktine AL, Suitor CW, Moats S, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010
Flood-Obbagy JE, Rolls BJ. The effect of fruit in different forms on energy intake and satiety at a meal.  Appetite. 2009;52(2):416-42219110020PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Mattes RD, Campbell WW. Effects of food form and timing of ingestion on appetite and energy intake in lean young adults and in young adults with obesity.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(3):430-43719248858PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
US Dept of Health and Human Services.  Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2004
Drewnowski A. The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(4):1095S-1101S20181811PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. MEC In-person dietary interviewers procedures manual. January 2002. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_01_02/dietary_year_3.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2012
Carlson A, Lino M, Juan WY,  et al.  Development of the CNPP Prices Database. Washington, DC: Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, US Dept of Agriculture; 2008
Rehm CD, Monsivais P, Drewnowski A. The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1333-133921918223PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
 US Dept of Agriculture (USDA). Agricultural Research Service. MyPyramid Equivalents Database. USDA website. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=17558. Accessed April 20, 2011
Subar AF, Krebs-Smith SM, Cook A, Kahle LL. Dietary sources of nutrients among US children, 1989-1991.  Pediatrics. 1998;102(4, pt 1):913-9239755265PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kumanyika SK, Obarzanek E, Stettler N,  et al.  Population-based prevention of obesity: the need for comprehensive promotion of healthful eating, physical activity, and energy balance: a scientific statement from American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Interdisciplinary Committee for Prevention (formerly the expert panel on population and prevention science).  Circulation. 2008;118(4):428-46418591433PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Rolls BJ, Drewnowski A, Ledikwe JH. Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(5):(suppl 1)  S98-S10315867904PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wang YC, Gortmaker SL, Sobol AM, Kuntz KM. Estimating the energy gap among US children: a counterfactual approach.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):e1721-e173317142497PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
O'Neil CE, Nicklas TA. A review of the relationship between 100% fruit juice consumption and weight in children and adolescents.  Am J Lifestyle Med. 2008;2(4):315-354Google ScholarCrossref
Wang YC, Bleich SN, Gortmaker SL. Increasing caloric contribution from sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% fruit juices among US children and adolescents, 1988-2004.  Pediatrics. 2008;121(6):e1604-e161418519465PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Condon EM, Fox MK. Sources of MyPyramid intakes among school children. Poster presented at: 2010 Food & Nutrition Conference & Expo; November 6-9, 2010; Boston, MA
Maillot M, Darmon N, Darmon M, Lafay L, Drewnowski A. Nutrient-dense food groups have high energy costs: an econometric approach to nutrient profiling.  J Nutr. 2007;137(7):1815-182017585036PubMedGoogle Scholar
Todd JE, Mancino L, Leibtag E, Tripodo C. Methodology Behind the Quarterly Food-at-Home Price Database. Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture; April 2010. Technical Bulletin 1926
Briley ME, Roberts-Gray C, Simpson D. Identification of factors that influence the menu at child care centers: a grounded theory approach.  J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94(3):276-2818120291PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Devine CM, Jastran M, Jabs J, Wethington E, Farell TJ, Bisogni CA. “A lot of sacrifices”: work-family spillover and the food choice coping strategies of low-wage employed parents.  Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(10):2591-260316889881PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Jabs J, Devine CM, Bisogni CA, Farrell TJ, Jastran M, Wethington E. Trying to find the quickest way: employed mothers' constructions of time for food.  J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007;39(1):18-2517276323PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref