The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk | Cancer Screening, Prevention, Control | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.153.100.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Smith-Bindman  R, Miglioretti  DL, Johnson  E,  et al.  Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010.  JAMA. 2012;307(22):2400-2409.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Smith-Bindman  R, Miglioretti  DL, Larson  EB.  Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1491-1502.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Brenner  DJ, Hall  EJ.  Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure.  N Engl J Med. 2007;357(22):2277-2284.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Broder  J, Fordham  LA, Warshauer  DM.  Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006.  Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(4):227-232.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Mettler  FA  Jr, Bhargavan  M, Faulkner  K,  et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950-2007.  Radiology. 2009;253(2):520-531.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Mitchell  JM.  Utilization trends for advanced imaging procedures: evidence from individuals with private insurance coverage in California.  Med Care. 2008;46(5):460-466.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
IMV Medical Information Division.  IMV 2012 CT Market Outlook Report. Des Plaines, IL: IMV Medical Information Division; 2012.
8.
Mettler  FA  Jr, Wiest  PW, Locken  JA, Kelsey  CA.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose.  J Radiol Prot. 2000;20(4):353-359.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Berrington de González  A, Mahesh  M, Kim  KP,  et al.  Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007.  Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071-2077.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation and National Research Council.  Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
11.
Preston  DL, Ron  E, Tokuoka  S,  et al.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.  Radiat Res. 2007;168(1):1-64.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Brenner  D, Elliston  C, Hall  E, Berdon  W.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):289-296.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Chodick  G, Ronckers  CM, Shalev  V, Ron  E.  Excess lifetime cancer mortality risk attributable to radiation exposure from computed tomography examinations in children.  Isr Med Assoc J. 2007;9(8):584-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Pearce  MS, Salotti  JA, Little  MP,  et al.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.  Lancet. 2012;380(9840):499-505.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Smith-Bindman  R, Lipson  J, Marcus  R,  et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer.  Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2078-2086.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Linet  MS, Kim  KP, Rajaraman  P.  Children’s exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations.  Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39(suppl 1):S4-S26.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Kim  PK, Zhu  X, Houseknecht  E, Nickolaus  D, Mahboubi  S, Nance  ML.  Effective radiation dose from radiologic studies in pediatric trauma patients.  World J Surg. 2005;29(12):1557-1562.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Brunetti  MA, Mahesh  M, Nabaweesi  R, Locke  P, Ziegfeld  S, Brown  R.  Diagnostic radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients.  J Trauma. 2011;70(2):E24-E28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Ahmed  BA, Connolly  BL, Shroff  P,  et al.  Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients.  Pediatrics. 2010;126(4):e851-e858.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Chawla  SC, Federman  N, Zhang  D,  et al.  Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review.  Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40(5):681-686.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Huda  W, Vance  A.  Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(2):540-546.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Donnelly  LF, Emery  KH, Brody  AS,  et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):303-306.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Paterson  A, Frush  DP, Donnelly  LF.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):297-301.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Arch  ME, Frush  DP.  Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):611-617.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Linton  OW, Mettler  FA  Jr; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(2):321-329.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Goske  MJ, Applegate  KE, Boylan  J,  et al.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(2):273-274.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Hornbrook  MC, Hart  G, Ellis  JL,  et al.  Building a virtual cancer research organization.  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;(35):12-25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Johnson  PB, Bahadori  AA, Eckerman  KF, Lee  C, Bolch  WE.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation—an update.  Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(8):2347-2365.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Lee  C, Lodwick  D, Hurtado  J, Pafundi  D, Williams  JL, Bolch  WE.  The UF family of reference hybrid phantoms for computational radiation dosimetry.  Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(2):339-363.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lee  C, Kim  KP, Long  DJ, Bolch  WE.  Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.  Med Phys. 2012;39(4):2129-2146.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Lee  C, Kim  KP, Long  D,  et al.  Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations.  Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1196-1206.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103.  Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2-4):1-332. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Slovis  TL.  Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept.  Pediatrics. 2003;112(4):971-972.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Dorfman  AL, Fazel  R, Einstein  AJ,  et al.  Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(5):458-464.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
International Commission on Radiological Protection.  Radiological protection and safety in medicine: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection [published correction appears in Ann ICRP. 1997;27(2):61].  Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2):1-47.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Shrimpton  PC, Wall  BF.  Reference doses for paediatric computed tomography.  Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2000;90(1-2):249-252. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033130.Google ScholarCrossref
37.
McCollough CH. Diagnostic reference levels. Image Wisely website. http://imagewisely.org/Imaging-Professionals/Medical-Physicists/Articles/Diagnostic-Reference-Levels.aspx. Accessed November 29, 2012.
38.
Image Gently: The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. CT—what can I do? http://pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/index.cfm?page=368. Accessed November 28, 2012.
39.
Shah  NB, Platt  SL.  ALARA: is there a cause for alarm? reducing radiation risks from computed tomography scanning in children.  Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008;20(3):243-247.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Society of Pediatric Radiology.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction: multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology: August 18-19, 2001.  Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(4):217-313.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Brenner  DJ.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.  Pediatr Radiol.2002;32(4):228-223; discussion 242-224. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Roebuck  DJ.  Risk and benefit in paediatric radiology.  Pediatr Radiol. 1999;29(8):637-640.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Donnelly  LF.  Reducing radiation dose associated with pediatric CT by decreasing unnecessary examinations.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(2):655-657.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Garcia Peña  BM, Mandl  KD, Kraus  SJ,  et al.  Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children.  JAMA. 1999;282(11):1041-1046.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Garcia Peña  BM, Cook  EF, Mandl  KD.  Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children.  Pediatrics. 2004;113(1, pt 1):24-28.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Wan  MJ, Krahn  M, Ungar  WJ,  et al.  Acute appendicitis in young children: cost-effectiveness of US versus CT in diagnosis—a Markov decision analytic model.  Radiology. 2009;250(2):378-386.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Krishnamoorthi  R, Ramarajan  N, Wang  NE,  et al.  Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA.  Radiology. 2011;259(1):231-239.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Kuppermann  N, Holmes  JF, Dayan  PS,  et al; Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN).  Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study.  Lancet. 2009;374(9696):1160-1170.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Berrington de Gonzalez  A, Iulian Apostoaei  A, Veiga  LH,  et al.  RadRAT: a radiation risk assessment tool for lifetime cancer risk projection.  J Radiol Prot. 2012;32(3):205-222.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
August 2013

The Use of Computed Tomography in Pediatrics and the Associated Radiation Exposure and Estimated Cancer Risk

Author Affiliations
  • 1Biostatistics Unit, Group Health Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 2Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 3Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu
  • 4Epidemiology Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Wisconsin
  • 5Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
  • 6HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • 7Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colorado
  • 8Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Southeast, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 9Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
  • 10Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany (Mr Vanneman)
  • 11Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Obstetrics, and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
  • 12Dr Miglioretti is now with the Department of Public Health Sciences, University California, Davis, and Group Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(8):700-707. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311
Abstract

Importance  Increased use of computed tomography (CT) in pediatrics raises concerns about cancer risk from exposure to ionizing radiation.

Objectives  To quantify trends in the use of CT in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and cancer risk.

Design  Retrospective observational study.

Setting  Seven US health care systems.

Participants  The use of CT was evaluated for children younger than 15 years of age from 1996 to 2010, including 4 857 736 child-years of observation. Radiation doses were calculated for 744 CT scans performed between 2001 and 2011.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Rates of CT use, organ and effective doses, and projected lifetime attributable risks of cancer.

Results  The use of CT doubled for children younger than 5 years of age and tripled for children 5 to 14 years of age between 1996 and 2005, remained stable between 2006 and 2007, and then began to decline. Effective doses varied from 0.03 to 69.2 mSv per scan. An effective dose of 20 mSv or higher was delivered by 14% to 25% of abdomen/pelvis scans, 6% to 14% of spine scans, and 3% to 8% of chest scans. Projected lifetime attributable risks of solid cancer were higher for younger patients and girls than for older patients and boys, and they were also higher for patients who underwent CT scans of the abdomen/pelvis or spine than for patients who underwent other types of CT scans. For girls, a radiation-induced solid cancer is projected to result from every 300 to 390 abdomen/pelvis scans, 330 to 480 chest scans, and 270 to 800 spine scans, depending on age. The risk of leukemia was highest from head scans for children younger than 5 years of age at a rate of 1.9 cases per 10 000 CT scans. Nationally, 4 million pediatric CT scans of the head, abdomen/pelvis, chest, or spine performed each year are projected to cause 4870 future cancers. Reducing the highest 25% of doses to the median might prevent 43% of these cancers.

Conclusions and Relevance  The increased use of CT in pediatrics, combined with the wide variability in radiation doses, has resulted in many children receiving a high-dose examination. Dose-reduction strategies targeted to the highest quartile of doses could dramatically reduce the number of radiation-induced cancers.

×