Prevalence Rates of Male and Female Sexual Violence Perpetrators in a National Sample of Adolescents | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Miller TR, Cohen MA, Wiersema B. Victim costs and consequences: a new look. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/victcost.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2012.
2.
Cortina  LM, Kubiak  SP.  Gender and posttraumatic stress: sexual violence as an explanation for women’s increased risk.  J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115(4):753-759.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Conoscenti  LM, McNally  RJ.  Health complaints in acknowledged and unacknowledged rape victims.  J Anxiety Disord. 2006;20(3):372-379.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
McFarlane  J, Malecha  A, Gist  J,  et al.  Intimate partner sexual assault against women and associated victim substance use, suicidality, and risk factors for femicide.  Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2005;26(9):953-967.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Snyder HN. Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: victim, incident, and offender characteristics. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/saycrle.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2012.
6.
Snyder HN, Sickmund M. Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report. http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/nr2006/downloads/NR2006.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2012.
7.
Righthand S, Welch C. Juveniles who have sexually offended: a review of the professional literature. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184739.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2012.
8.
Abbey  A.  Lessons learned and unanswered questions about sexual assault perpetration.  J Interpers Violence. 2005;20(1):39-42.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Maxwell  CD, Robinson  AL, Post  LA.  The nature and predictors of sexual victimization and offending among adolescents.  J Youth Adolesc. 2003;32(6):465-477. doi:10.1023/A:1025942503285.Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Malamuth  NM, Linz  D, Heavey  CL, Barnes  G, Acker  M.  Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men’s conflict with women: a 10-year follow-up study.  J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(2):353-369.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
White  JW, Smith  PH.  Covariation in the use of physical and sexual intimate partner aggression among adolescent and college-age men: a longitudinal analysis.  Violence Against Women. 2009;15(1):24-43.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Abbey  A, McAuslan  P.  A longitudinal examination of male college students’ perpetration of sexual assault.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72(5):747-756.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Hall  GC, Barongan  C.  Prevention of sexual aggression: sociocultural risk and protective factors.  Am Psychol. 1997;52(1):5-14.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Fago  DP.  Evaluation and treatment of neurodevelopmental deficits in sexually aggressive children and adolescents.  Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2003;34(3):248-257.Google ScholarCrossref
15.
de Bruijn  P, Burrie  I, van Wel  F.  A risky boundary: unwanted sexual behaviour among youth.  J Sex Aggress. 2006;12(2):81-96. doi:10.1080/13552600600841631.Google ScholarCrossref
16.
Ray  JA, English  DJ.  Comparison of female and male children with sexual behavior problems.  J Youth Adolesc. 1995;24(4):439-451. doi:10.1007/BF01537190.Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Vandiver  DM, Teske  R  Jr.  Juvenile female and male sex offenders: a comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics.  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006;50(2):148-165.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Tolman  DL, Kim  JL, Schooler  D, Sorsoli  CL.  Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: bringing gender into focus.  J Adolesc Health. 2007;40(1):84.e9-84.e16.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Brown  JD, L'Engle  KL.  X-rated: sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with US early adolescents' exposure to sexually explicit media.  Communic Res. 2009;36(1):129-151. doi:10.1177/0093650208326465.Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Chandra  A, Martino  SC, Collins  RL,  et al.  Does watching sex on television predict teen pregnancy? findings from a national longitudinal survey of youth.  Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):1047-1054.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Ybarra  ML, Mitchell  KJ, Hamburger  M, Diener-West  M, Leaf  PJ.  X-rated material and perpetration of sexually aggressive behavior among children and adolescents: is there a link?  Aggress Behav. 2011;37(1):1-18.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Kaplowitz  MD, Hadlock  TD, Levine  R.  A comparison of web and mail survey response rates.  Public Opin Q. 2004;68(1):94-101. doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006.Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Cook  C, Heath  F, Thompson  RL.  A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys.  Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60(6):821-836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934.Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Lenhart A, Purcell K, Smith A, Zickuhr K. Social media and young adults. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Social-Media-and-Young-Adults.aspx. Accessed November 28, 2012.
25.
Basile KC, Saltzman LE. Sexual violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements. http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pub/SV_surveillance.html. Accessed November 28, 2012.
26.
Koss  MP, Gaines  JA.  The prediction of sexual aggression by alcohol use, athletic participation, and fraternity affiliation.  J Interpers Violence. 1993;8(1):94-108. doi:10.1177/088626093008001007.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Koss  MP, Gidycz  CA, Wisniewski  N.  The scope of rape: incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(2):162-170.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. Rape and sexual assault. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=317. Accessed November 21, 2012.
29.
Hoertel  N, Le Strat  Y, Schuster  J-P, Limosin  F.  Sexual assaulters in the United States: prevalence and psychiatric correlates in a national sample.  Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(6):1379-1387.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Berrens  RP, Bohara  AK, Jenkins-Smith  H, Silva  C, Weimer  DL.  The advent of Internet surveys for political research: a comparison of telephone and Internet samples.  Polit Anal. 2003;11(1):1-22. doi:10.1093/pan/11.1.1.Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Schonlau  M, Zapert  K, Simon  LP,  et al.  A comparison between response from a propensity-weighted web survey and an identical RDD survey.  Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2004;22(1):128-138. doi:10.1177/0894439303256551.Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Taylor  H, Bremer  J, Overmeyer  C, Siegel  JW, Terhanian  G.  The record of Internet-based opinion polls in predicting the results of 72 races in the November 2000 US elections.  Int J Mark Res. 2001;43(2):127-138.Google Scholar
33.
Berrens  RP, Bohara  AK, Jenkins-Smith  HC, Silva  CL, Weimer  DL.  Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national Internet samples.  J Environ Econ Manage. 2004;47(2):331-363. doi:10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00094-9.Google ScholarCrossref
34.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey. http://www.bls.gov/cps/ Accessed July 5, 2006.
35.
Windle  M, Grunbaum  JA, Elliott  M,  et al.  Healthy passages: a multilevel, multimethod longitudinal study of adolescent health.  Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(2):164-172.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Vandiver  DM.  Assessing gender differences and co-offending patterns of a predominantly “male-oriented” crime: a comparison of a cross-national sample of juvenile boys and girls arrested for a sexual offense.  Violence Vict. 2010;25(2):243-264.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Steinberg  L, Morris  AS.  Adolescent development.  Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):83-110.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Lerner  RM, Galambos  NL.  Adolescent development: challenges and opportunities for research, programs, and policies.  Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49(1):413-446.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Bouchey  HA, Furman  W. Dating and romantic experiences in adolescence. In: Adams  GR, Berzonsky  M, eds.  Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence. Oxford, England: Blackwell; 2003:313-329.
40.
Collins  WA.  More than myth: the developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence.  J Res Adolesc. 2003;13(1):1-24. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.1301001.Google ScholarCrossref
41.
Basile  KC, Chen  J, Black  MC, Saltzman  LE.  Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among US adults, 2001-2003.  Violence Vict. 2007;22(4):437-448.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Finkelhor  D. Developmental victimology: the comprehensive study of childhood victimization. In: Davis  R, Lurigio  A, Herman  S, eds.  Victims of Crime.3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007:9-34.
43.
Tabachnick J, Dawson E. Stop It Now! Vermont: four year program evaluation 1995-1999. http://www.stopitnow.org/files/VT%20Final%20Evaluation%20Report%202000.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2013.
44.
Finkelhor  D.  Childhood Victimization: Violence, Crime, and Abuse in the Lives of Young People. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2008.
45.
Chapleau  KM, Oswald  DL, Russell  BL.  How ambivalent sexism toward women and men support rape myth acceptance.  Sex Roles. 2007;57(1-2):131-136. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9196-2.Google ScholarCrossref
46.
Chapleau  KM, Oswald  DL, Russell  BL.  Male rape myths: the role of gender, violence, and sexism.  J Interpers Violence. 2008;23(5):600-615.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Struckman-Johnson  C, Struckman-Johnson  D.  College men’s and women’s reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level.  Sex Roles. 1993;29(5-6):371-385. doi:10.1007/BF00289430.Google ScholarCrossref
48.
Davies  M, Rogers  P.  Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assaults: a review of the literature.  Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11(4):367-377. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.002.Google ScholarCrossref
49.
Russell  BL, Oswald  DL, Kraus  SW.  Evaluations of sexual assault: perceptions of guilt and legal elements for male and female aggressors using various coercive strategies.  Violence Vict. 2011;26(6):799-815.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Sachs  BD.  A contextual definition of male sexual arousal.  Horm Behav. 2007;51(5):569-578.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Sachs  BD.  Placing erection in context: the reflexogenic-psychogenic dichotomy reconsidered.  Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1995;19(2):211-224.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf. Accessed November 28, 2012.
53.
Kahn  AS, Jackson  J, Kully  C, Badger  K, Halvorsen  J.  Calling it rape: differences in experiences of women who do or do not label their sexual assault as rape.  Psychol Women Q. 2003;27(3):233-242. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00103.Google ScholarCrossref
54.
Russell  BL, Oswald  DL.  Sexual coercion and victimization of college men: the role of love styles.  J Interpers Violence. 2002;17(3):273-285. doi:10.1177/0886260502017003003.Google ScholarCrossref
55.
Davies  M, Rogers  P, Whitelegg  L.  Effects of victim gender, victim sexual orientation, victim response and respondent gender on judgements of blame in a hypothetical adolescent rape.  Leg Criminol Psychol. 2009;14(2):331-338. doi:10.1348/978185408X386030.Google ScholarCrossref
56.
Grubb  A, Harrower  J.  Attribution of blame in cases of rape: an analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim.  Aggress Violent Behav. 2008;13(5):396-405. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.06.006.Google ScholarCrossref
57.
Grubb  AR, Harrower  J.  Understanding attribution of blame in cases of rape: an analysis of participant gender, type of rape and perceived similarity to the victim.  J Sex Aggress. 2009;15(1):63-81. doi:10.1080/13552600802641649.Google ScholarCrossref
58.
McMahon  S, Banyard  VL.  When can I help? a conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention.  Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012;13(1):3-14.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
59.
Miller  E, Tancredi  DJ, McCauley  HL,  et al.  “Coaching boys into men”: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a dating violence prevention program.  J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(5):431-438.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
60.
Katz  J, Heisterkamp  HA, Fleming  WM.  The social justice roots of the Mentors in Violence Prevention model and its application in a high school setting.  Violence Against Women. 2011;17(6):684-702.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    BJS' Definition of rape
    Tamen Egalitarian | Citizen
    The paper state that it's definition of rape is consistent with the Bureau of Justice Statistics' (BJS) definition of rape and provides a link to the definition in the footnotes. The BJS definition however requires that the victim of rape is the one being penetrated, although when viewing the examples of questions given in the survey it appears that the paper operate with a definition of rape where the perpetrator may be the one being penetrated and the victim may be the one penetrating, e.g. a woman forcing a man to vaginal sex. Could the author's clarify this apparent discrepancy and state outright whether their definition of rape would include a woman forcing a man to penetrate her?
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    December 2013

    Prevalence Rates of Male and Female Sexual Violence Perpetrators in a National Sample of Adolescents

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Center for Innovative Public Health Research, San Clemente, California
    • 2Crimes Against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham
    JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(12):1125-1134. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2629
    Abstract

    Importance  Sexual violence can emerge in adolescence, yet little is known about youth perpetrators—especially those not involved with the criminal justice system.

    Objective  To report national estimates of adolescent sexual violence perpetration and details of the perpetrator experience.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  Data were collected online in 2010 (wave 4) and 2011 (wave 5) in the national Growing Up With Media study. Participants included 1058 youths aged 14 to 21 years who at baseline read English, lived in the household at least 50% of the time, and had used the Internet in the last 6 months. Recruitment was balanced on youths’ biological sex and age.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  Forced sexual contact, coercive sex, attempted rape, and completed rape.

    Results  Nearly 1 in 10 youths (9%) reported some type of sexual violence perpetration in their lifetime; 4% (10 females and 39 males) reported attempted or completed rape. Sixteen years old was the mode age of first sexual perpetration (n = 18 [40%]). Perpetrators reported greater exposure to violent X-rated content. Almost all perpetrators (98%) who reported age at first perpetration to be 15 years or younger were male, with similar but attenuated results among those who began at ages 16 or 17 years (90%). It is not until ages 18 or 19 years that males (52%) and females (48%) are relatively equally represented as perpetrators. Perhaps related to age at first perpetration, females were more likely to perpetrate against older victims, and males were more likely to perpetrate against younger victims. Youths who started perpetrating earlier were more likely than older youths to get in trouble with caregivers; youths starting older were more likely to indicate that no one found out about the perpetration.

    Conclusions and Relevance  Sexual violence perpetration appears to emerge earlier for males than females, perhaps suggesting different developmental trajectories. Links between perpetration and violent sexual media are apparent, suggesting a need to monitor adolescents’ consumption of this material. Victim blaming appears to be common, whereas experiencing consequences does not. There is therefore urgent need for school programs that encourage bystander intervention as well as implementation of policies that could enhance the likelihood that perpetrators are identified.

    ×