Youth Problem Behaviors 8 Years After Implementing the Communities That Care Prevention System: A Community-Randomized Trial | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 Adolescent Health Objectives. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=2. Accessed March 3, 2011.
2.
US Department of Health and Human Services.  The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent and Reduce Underage Drinking. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General; 2007.
3.
Hawkins  JD, Catalano  RF.  Communities That Care: Action for Drug Abuse Prevention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1992.
4.
Kania  J, Kramer  M.  Collective impact.  Stanford Soc Innov Rev. 2011;9(1):36-41.Google Scholar
5.
Hawkins  JD, Catalano  RF, Arthur  MW,  et al.  Testing Communities That Care: the rationale, design and behavioral baseline equivalence of the Community Youth Development Study.  Prev Sci. 2008;9(3):178-190.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Pentz  MA, Dwyer  JH, MacKinnon  DP,  et al.  A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse.  JAMA. 1989;261(22):3259-3266.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Pentz  MA, Trebow  EA, Hansen  WB, MacKinnon  DP.  Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: the Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP).  Eval Rev. 1990;14(3):264-289.Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Chou  CP, Montgomery  S, Pentz  MA,  et al.  Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents.  Am J Public Health. 1998;88(6):944-948.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Perry  CL, Williams  CL, Komro  KA,  et al.  Project Northland: long-term outcomes of community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use.  Health Educ Res. 2002;17(1):117-132.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Wagenaar  AC, Gehan  JP, Jones-Webb  R, Toomey  TL, Forster  JL.  Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol: lessons and results from a 15-community randomized trial.  J Community Psychol. 1999;27(3):315-326.Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Grube  JW.  Preventing sales of alcohol to minors.  Addiction. 1997;92(suppl 2):S251-S260.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Holder  HD, Gruenewald  PJ, Ponicki  WR,  et al.  Effect of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries.  JAMA. 2000;284(18):2341-2347.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Spoth  R, Redmond  C, Shin  C, Greenberg  M, Clair  S, Feinberg  M.  Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: the PROSPER Community-University Partnership Trial.  Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(5):395-402.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Brown  EC, Hawkins  JD, Arthur  MW, Briney  JS, Abbott  RD.  Effects of Communities That Care on prevention services systems: findings from the Community Youth Development Study at 1.5 years.  Prev Sci. 2007;8(3):180-191.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Brown  EC, Hawkins  JD, Arthur  MW, Briney  JS, Fagan  AA.  Prevention service system transformation using Communities That Care.  J Community Psychol. 2011;39(2):183-201. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Rhew  IC, Brown  EC, Hawkins  JD, Briney  JS.  Sustained effects of the Communities That Care system on prevention service system transformation.  Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):529-535.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Fagan  AA, Arthur  MW, Hanson  K, Briney  JS, Hawkins  JD.  Effects of Communities That Care on the adoption and implementation fidelity of evidence-based prevention programs in communities.  Prev Sci. 2011;12(3):223-234.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Hawkins  JD, Brown  EC, Oesterle  S, Arthur  MW, Abbott  RD, Catalano  RF.  Early effects of Communities That Care on targeted risks and initiation of delinquent behavior and substance use.  J Adolesc Health. 2008;43(1):15-22.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Hawkins  JD, Oesterle  S, Brown  EC,  et al.  Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency: a test of Communities That Care.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(9):789-798.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Hawkins  JD, Oesterle  S, Brown  EC,  et al.  Sustained decreases in risk exposure and youth problem behaviors after installation of the Communities That Care prevention system in a randomized trial.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(2):141-148.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Gloppen  KM, Arthur  MW, Hawkins  JD, Shapiro  VB.  Sustainability of the Communities That Care prevention system by coalitions participating in the Community Youth Development Study.  J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(3):259-264.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Arthur MW, Gloppen KM, Hawkins JD. Sustainability of the Communities That Care prevention system. Paper presented at: 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Prevention Research; May 30, 2012; Washington, DC.
23.
Brown  EC, Graham  JW, Hawkins  JD,  et al.  Design and analysis of the Community Youth Development Study longitudinal cohort sample.  Eval Rev. 2009;33(4):311-334.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Arthur  MW, Hawkins  JD, Pollard  JA, Catalano  RF, Baglioni  AJ  Jr.  Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: the Communities That Care Youth Survey.  Eval Rev. 2002;26(6):575-601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Glaser  RR, Van Horn  ML, Arthur  MW, Hawkins  JD, Catalano  RF.  Measurement properties of the Communities That Care® Youth Survey across demographic groups.  J Quant Criminol. 2005;21(1):73-102.Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Social Development Research Group.  Community Youth Development Study, Youth Development Survey, 2005-2001, Grades 5-12. Seattle: Social Development Research Group, University of Washington; 2011.
27.
Arthur  MW, Briney  JS, Hawkins  JD, Abbott  RD, Brooke-Weiss  BL, Catalano  RF.  Measuring risk and protection in communities using the Communities That Care Youth Survey.  Eval Program Plann. 2007;30(2):197-211.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Briney  JS, Brown  EC, Hawkins  JD, Arthur  MW.  Predictive validity of established cut points for risk and protective factor scales from the Communities That Care Youth Survey.  J Prim Prev. 2012;33(5-6):249-258.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Graham  JW, Hofer  SM. Multiple imputation in multivariate research. In: Little  TD, Schnabel  KU, Baumert  J, eds.  Modeling Longitudinal and Multi-group Data: Practical Issues, Applied Approaches, and Specific Examples. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates; 2000:201-218, 269-281.
30.
Schafer  JL, Graham  JW.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art.  Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147-177.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Graham  JW, Taylor  BJ, Olchowski  AE, Cumsille  PE.  Planned missing data designs in psychological research.  Psychol Methods. 2006;11(4):323-343.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Rubin  DB.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.
33.
Murray  DM.  Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
34.
Schafer  JL, Kang  J.  Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies.  Psychol Methods. 2008;13(4):279-313.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Breslow  NE, Clayton  DG.  Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models.  J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(421):9-25.Google Scholar
36.
Liang  K-Y, Zeger  SL.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models.  Biometrika. 1986;73(1):13-22.Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Cummings  P.  Methods for estimating adjusted risk ratios.  Stata J. 2009;9(2):175-196.Google Scholar
38.
Localio  AR, Margolis  DJ, Berlin  JA.  Relative risks and confidence intervals were easily computed indirectly from multivariable logistic regression.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(9):874-882.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Zeger  SL, Liang  KY, Albert  PS.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.  Biometrics. 1988;44(4):1049-1060. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Kuklinski  MR, Briney  JS, Hawkins  JD, Catalano  RF.  Cost-benefit analysis of Communities That Care outcomes at eighth grade.  Prev Sci. 2012;13(2):150-161.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Johnston  LD, O'Malley  PM, Bachman  JG, Schulenberg  JE.  Monitoring the Future: National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2011. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2012.
42.
Kuklinski  MR, Hawkins  JD, Plotnick  RD, Abbott  RD, Reid  CK.  How has the economic downturn affected communities and implementation of science-based prevention in the randomized trial of Communities That Care?  Am J Community Psychol. 2013;51(3-4):370-384.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
February 2014

Youth Problem Behaviors 8 Years After Implementing the Communities That Care Prevention System: A Community-Randomized Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 2Educational Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(2):122-129. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4009
Abstract

Importance  Community-based efforts to prevent adolescent problem behaviors are essential to promote public health and achieve collective impact community wide.

Objective  To test whether the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system reduced levels of risk and adolescent problem behaviors community wide 8 years after implementation of CTC.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A community-randomized trial was performed in 24 small towns in 7 states, matched within state, assigned randomly to a control or intervention group in 2003. All fifth-grade students attending public schools in study communities in 2003-2004 who received consent from their parents to participate (76.4% of the eligible population) were included. A panel of 4407 fifth graders was surveyed through 12th grade, with 92.5% of the sample participating at the last follow-up.

Interventions  A coalition of community stakeholders received training and technical assistance to install CTC, used epidemiologic data to identify elevated risk factors and depressed protective factors for adolescent problem behaviors in the community, and implemented tested and effective programs for youths aged 10 to 14 years as well as their families and schools to address their community’s elevated risks.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Levels of targeted risk; sustained abstinence, and cumulative incidence by grade 12; and current prevalence of tobacco, alcohol, and other drug use, delinquency, and violence in 12th grade.

Results  By spring of 12th grade, students in CTC communities were more likely than students in control communities to have abstained from any drug use (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63), drinking alcohol (ARR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09-1.58), smoking cigarettes (ARR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27), and engaging in delinquency (ARR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36). They were also less likely to ever have committed a violent act (ARR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98). There were no significant differences by intervention group in targeted risks, the prevalence of past-month or past-year substance use, or past-year delinquency or violence.

Conclusions and Relevance  Using the CTC system continued to prevent the initiation of adolescent problem behaviors through 12th grade, 8 years after implementation of CTC and 3 years after study-provided resources ended, but did not produce reductions in current levels of risk or current prevalence of problem behavior in 12th grade.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01088542

×