Effects of Child Development Accounts on Early Social-Emotional Development: An Experimental Test | Child Development | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Cramer R, Newville D. Children’s Savings Accounts: The Case for Creating a Lifelong Savings Platform at Birth as a Foundation for a “Save-and-Invest” Economy. New America Foundation Asset Building Program Policy Paper. December 2009. http://www.newamerica.net/sites/newamerica.net/files/policydocs/CSAPolicyRationale_0.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2013.
2.
Sherraden  M.  Assets and the Poor: A New American Welfare Policy. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe; 1991.
3.
Meyer  J, Masa  RD, Zimmerman  JM.  Overview of Child Development Accounts in developing countries.  Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32(11):1561-1569.Google ScholarCrossref
4.
Loke  V, Sherraden  M.  Building assets from birth: a global comparison of Child Development Account policies.  Int J Soc Welf. 2009;18(2):119-129.Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Conley  D.  Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, Social Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1999.
6.
Williams Shanks  TR, Kim  Y, Loke  V, Destin  M.  Assets and child well-being in developed countries.  Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32(11):1488-1496.Google ScholarCrossref
7.
Williams Shanks  TR, Robinson  C.  Assets, economic opportunity and toxic stress: a framework for understanding child and educational outcomes.  Econ Educ Rev. 2013;33:154-170.Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Lerman  RI, McKernan  SM. Benefits and consequences of holding assets. In: McKernan  SM, Sherraden  M, eds.  Asset Building and Low-Income Families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2008:175-206.
9.
Orr  AJ.  Black-white differences in achievement: the importance of wealth.  Sociol Educ. 2003;76(4):281-304.Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Yeung  WJ, Conley  D.  Black-white achievement gap and family wealth.  Child Dev. 2008;79(2):303-324.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Zhan  M.  Assets, parental expectations and involvement, and children’s educational performance.  Child Youth Serv Rev. 2006;28(8):961-975.Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Huang  J, Guo  B, Kim  Y, Sherraden  M.  Parental income, assets, borrowing constraints and children’s post-secondary education.  Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32(4):585-594.Google ScholarCrossref
13.
Kim  Y, Sherraden  M.  Do parental assets matter for children’s educational attainment?: evidence from mediation tests.  Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(6):969-979.Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Williams Shanks  TR.  The impacts of household wealth on child development.  J Poverty. 2007;11(2):93-116.Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Boyle  MH.  Home ownership and the emotional and behavioral problems of children and youth.  Child Dev. 2002;73(3):883-892.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Kim  Y, Sherraden  M, Clancy  M.  Do mothers’ educational expectations differ by race and ethnicity, or socioeconomic status?  Econ Educ Rev. 2013;33:82-94.Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Zhan  M, Sherraden  M.  Assets, expectations, and children’s educational achievement in female-headed households.  Soc Serv Rev. 2003;77(2):191-211.Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Dearden L, Sibieta L, Sylva K. The socio-economic gradient in early child outcomes: evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study. Institute for Fiscal Studies working paper W11/03. March 2011. http://dx.medra.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2011.1103. Accessed October 1, 2013.
19.
Elliott  W  III, Beverly  SG.  Staying on course: the effects of savings and assets on the college progress of young adults.  Am J Educ. 2011;117(3):343-374.Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Clancy M, Sherraden M. The Potential for Inclusion in 529 Savings Plans: Report on a Survey of States. St Louis, MO: Washington University in St Louis, Center for Social Development Research Report; 2003. http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/ResearchReport-529savingsplansurvey.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2013.
21.
US Department of Treasury. An Analysis of Section 529 College Savings and Prepaid Tuition Plans: A Report Prepared by the Department of Treasury for the White House Task Force on Middle Class Working Families. September 9, 2009. http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/economic-policy/Documents/09092009TreasuryReportSection529.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2013.
22.
Marks EL, Rhodes BB, Scheffler S. SEED for Oklahoma Kids: Baseline Analysis. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2008.
23.
Nam  Y, Kim  Y, Clancy  M, Zager  R, Sherraden  M.  Do Child Development Accounts promote account holding, saving, and asset accumulation for children’s future?: evidence from a statewide randomized experiment.  J Policy Anal Manage. 2013;32(1):6-33.Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Gray K, Clancy M, Sherraden MS, Wagner K, Miller-Cribbs J. Interviews With Mothers of Young Children in the SEED for Oklahoma Kids College Savings Experiment. Washington University in St Louis, Center for Social Development Research Report 12-53. 2012. http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/RP12-53.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2013.
25.
Sherraden M, Clancy M. The Universal Model in SEED. Washington University in St Louis, Center for Social Development Research Report. September 30, 2005. http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/overview_um_seed_092005.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2013.
26.
Zager R, Kim Y, Nam Y, Clancy M, Sherraden M. The SEED for Oklahoma Kids Experiment: Initial Account Opening and Savings. Washington University in St Louis, Center for Social Development Research Report 10-14. 2010. http://csd.wustl.edu/Publications/Documents/RP10-14.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2013.
27.
Squires  J, Bricker  DD, Twombly  E.  Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE). Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2002.
28.
Schreiner  M.  Meta-Data for SEED for Oklahoma Kids: Two Survey Waves and OSCP Administrative Data Through 2011Q4. St Louis, MO: Washington University in St Louis, Center for Social Development; 2012.
29.
Imbens  GW.  Better LATE than nothing: some comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009).  J Econ Lit. 2010;48(2):399-423.Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Perneger  TV.  What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.  BMJ. 1998;316(7139):1236-1238.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Orr  LL.  Social Experiments: Evaluating Public Programs With Experimental Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
32.
Puma M, Bell S, Cook R, et al. Head Start Impact Study: Final Report. 2010. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/hs_impact_study_final.pdf. Accessed April 22, 2013.
33.
Sherraden  MS, Peters  C, Wagner  K, Guo  B, Clancy  M.  Contributions of qualitative research to understanding savings for children and youth.  Econ Educ Rev. 2013;32:66-77.Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Bierman  KL, Domitrovich  CE, Nix  RL,  et al.  Promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness: the Head Start REDI program.  Child Dev. 2008;79(6):1802-1817.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
High  PC; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care and Council on School Health.  School readiness.  Pediatrics. 2008;121(4):e1008-e1015.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Squires  J, Bricker  D, Heo  K, Twombly  E.  Identification of social-emotional problems in young children using a parent-completed screening measure.  Early Child Res Q. 2002;16(4):405-419.Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Lyman  DR, Njoroge  W, Willis  DW.  Early childhood psychosocial screening in culturally diverse populations: a survey of clinical experience with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional (ASQ: SE).  Zero Three. 2007;27(5):46-54.Google Scholar
38.
Heckman  JJ, Kautz  T.  Hard evidence on soft skills.  Labour Econ. 2012;19(4):451-464.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
March 2014

Effects of Child Development Accounts on Early Social-Emotional Development: An Experimental Test

Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Social Work, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
  • 2Center for Social Development, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
  • 3School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(3):265-271. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4643
Abstract

Importance  This study, based on Oklahoma’s statewide Child Development Accounts (CDAs) program, presents findings from the first experimental test of the hypothesis that creating lifelong savings accounts for children at birth promotes their long-term well-being.

Objective  To examine the effects of CDAs, an innovative social policy to encourage lifelong saving and asset building for long-term development, on parent-reported social-emotional development in early childhood.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A statewide randomized experiment of CDAs was conducted in 2008, drawing a probability sample of 7328 children from all infants born in two 3-month periods in Oklahoma (April 1 through June 30 and August 1 through October 31, 2007). After agreeing to participate in the experiment, caregivers of 2704 infants completed a baseline survey and were randomly assigned to treatment (n = 1358) and control groups (n = 1346). Approximately 84% of participants completed a follow-up survey in the spring of 2011.

Interventions  The intervention offered CDAs, built on the existing Oklahoma 529 college-savings plan, to treatment participants. It also provided additional financial incentives and information.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome—child social-emotional development—is measured by scores from a 17-item version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional. Caregivers completed it in the 3-year follow-up survey. Lower scores indicate better functioning.

Results  The CDAs have positive effects on social-emotional development for children at approximately age 4 years. The nonweighted treatment-control difference is –1.56 (90% CI, −2.87 to −0.22; P = .06), but the weighted difference is nonsignificant. The effects appear to be greater for disadvantaged subsamples, such as low-income households (weighted mean difference, –2.21; 90% CI, −4.01 to −0.42; P = .04).

Conclusions and Relevance  As a complement to other early education and health interventions, CDAs may improve social-emotional development in early childhood. Their effects may be explained as a mediating process that influences parents. Child Development Accounts may influence parental attitudes, behaviors, expectations, and involvement; in turn, these may affect child development.

×