Rates of Adverse Events Associated With Male Circumcision in US Medical Settings, 2001 to 2010 | Health Care Safety | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision.  Circumcision policy statement.  Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):585-586.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Bailey  RC, Moses  S, Parker  CB,  et al.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2007;369(9562):643-656.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Auvert  B, Taljaard  D, Lagarde  E, Sobngwi-Tambekou  J, Sitta  R, Puren  A.  Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial [published correction appears in PLoS Med. 2006;3(5):e298].  PLoS Med. 2005;2(11):e298. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Gray  RH, Kigozi  G, Serwadda  D,  et al.  Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial.  Lancet. 2007;369(9562):657-666.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Smith  DK, Taylor  A, Kilmarx  PH,  et al.  Male circumcision in the United States for the prevention of HIV infection and other adverse health outcomes: report from a CDC consultation.  Public Health Rep. 2010;125(suppl 1):72-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Bristol  N.  Male circumcision debate flares in the USA.  Lancet. 2011;378(9806):1837. PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Collier  R.  Ugly, messy and nasty debate surrounds circumcision.  CMAJ. 2012;184(1):E25-E26. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4017.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Latza Nadeau  B. Europe goes after circumcision. The Daily Beast. August 24, 2012. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/24/europe-goes-after-circumcision.html. Accessed September 27, 2012.
9.
Wiswell  TE, Geschke  DW.  Risks from circumcision during the first month of life compared with those for uncircumcised boys.  Pediatrics. 1989;83(6):1011-1015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Christakis  DA, Harvey  E, Zerr  DM, Feudtner  C, Wright  JA, Connell  FA.  A trade-off analysis of routine newborn circumcision.  Pediatrics. 2000;105(1, pt 3):246-249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Ozkan  S, Gürpinar  T.  A serious circumcision complication: penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcome.  J Urol. 1997;158(5):1946-1947.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Atikeler  MK, Geçit  I, Yüzgeç  V, Yalçin  O.  Complications of circumcision performed within and outside the hospital.  Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(1):97-99.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Ben Chaim  J, Livne  PM, Binyamini  J, Hardak  B, Ben-Meir  D, Mor  Y.  Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey.  Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(6):368-370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Corbett  HJ, Humphrey  GM.  Early complications of circumcisions performed in the community.  Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53(496):887-888.PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Van Howe  RS.  Incidence of meatal stenosis following neonatal circumcision in a primary care setting.  Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2006;45(1):49-54.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Pieretti  RV, Goldstein  AM, Pieretti-Vanmarcke  R.  Late complications of newborn circumcision: a common and avoidable problem.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26(5):515-518.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Ozdemir  E.  Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions.  Br J Urol. 1997;80(1):136-139.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kigozi  G, Gray  RH, Wawer  MJ,  et al.  The safety of adult male circumcision in HIV-infected and uninfected men in Rakai, Uganda.  PLoS Med. 2008;5(6):e116. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050116.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Kiggundu  V, Watya  S, Kigozi  G,  et al.  The number of procedures required to achieve optimal competency with male circumcision: findings from a randomized trial in Rakai, Uganda.  BJU Int. 2009;104(4):529-532.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Wilcken  A, Keil  T, Dick  B.  Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: a systematic review of prevalence and complications.  Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(12):907-914.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Mousavi  SA, Salehifar  E.  Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 months.  Adv Urol. 2008:606123. doi:10.1155/2008/606123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Weiss  HA, Larke  N, Halperin  D, Schenker  I.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.  BMC Urol. 2010;10:2. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-10-2.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Horowitz  M, Gershbein  AB.  Gomco circumcision: when is it safe?  J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(7):1047-1049.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Fleiss  JL.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
25.
Glanz  JM, McClure  DL, Xu  S,  et al.  Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(8):808-818.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Fine  PE, Chen  RT.  Confounding in studies of adverse reactions to vaccines.  Am J Epidemiol. 1992;136(2):121-135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
France  EK, Glanz  JM, Xu  S,  et al.  Safety of the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among children: a population-based study.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(11):1031-1036.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Herman-Roloff  A, Bailey  RC, Agot  K.  Factors associated with the safety of voluntary medical male circumcision in Nyanza province, Kenya.  Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(10):773-781.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Young  MR, Bailey  RC, Odoyo-June  E,  et al.  Safety of over twelve hundred infant male circumcisions using the Mogen clamp in Kenya.  PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47395. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047395.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Gluckman  GR, Stoller  ML, Jacobs  MM, Kogan  BA.  Newborn penile glans amputation during circumcision and successful reattachment.  J Urol. 1995;153(3, pt 1):778-779.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Jezior  JR, Brady  JD, Schlossberg  SM.  Management of penile amputation injuries.  World J Surg. 2001;25(12):1602-1609.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Trends in in-hospital newborn male circumcision: United States, 1999-2010.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(34):1167-1168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Benatar  M, Benatar  D.  Between prophylaxis and child abuse: the ethics of neonatal male circumcision.  Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(2):35-48.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
July 2014

Rates of Adverse Events Associated With Male Circumcision in US Medical Settings, 2001 to 2010

Author Affiliations
  • 1Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Applied Sciences, Scientific Education and Professional Development Program, Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 2Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 3Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle
  • 4Division of Pediatric Urology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):625-634. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5414
Abstract

Importance  Approximately 1.4 million male circumcisions (MCs) are performed annually in US medical settings. However, population-based estimates of MC-associated adverse events (AEs) are lacking.

Objectives  To estimate the incidence rate of MC-associated AEs and to assess whether AE rates differed by age at circumcision.

Design  We selected 41 possible MC AEs based on a literature review and on medical billing codes. We estimated a likely risk window for the incidence calculation for each MC AE based on pathogenesis. We used 2001 to 2010 data from SDI Health, a large administrative claims data set, to conduct a retrospective cohort study.

Setting and Participants  SDI Health provided administrative claims data from inpatient and outpatient US medical settings.

Main Outcomes and Measures  For each AE, we calculated the incidence per million MCs. We compared the incidence risk ratio and the incidence rate difference for circumcised vs uncircumcised newborn males and for males circumcised at younger than 1 year, age 1 to 9 years, or 10 years or older. An AE was considered probably related to MC if the incidence risk ratio significantly exceeded 1 at P < .05 or occurred only in circumcised males.

Results  Records were available for 1 400 920 circumcised males, 93.3% as newborns. Of 41 possible MC AEs, 16 (39.0%) were probable. The incidence of total MC AEs was slightly less than 0.5%. Rates of potentially serious MC AEs ranged from 0.76 (95% CI, 0.10-5.43) per million MCs for stricture of male genital organs to 703.23 (95% CI, 659.22-750.18) per million MCs for repair of incomplete circumcision. Compared with boys circumcised at younger than 1 year, the incidences of probable AEs were approximately 20-fold and 10-fold greater for males circumcised at age 1 to 9 years and at 10 years or older, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance  Male circumcision had a low incidence of AEs overall, especially if the procedure was performed during the first year of life, but rose 10-fold to 20-fold when performed after infancy.

×