Effect of the Teen Driving Plan on the Driving Performance of Teenagers Before Licensure: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Ehsani  JP, Bingham  CR, Shope  JT.  Graduated driver licensing for new drivers: effects of three states’ policies on crash rates among teenagers.  Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(1):9-18.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Males  M.  California’s graduated driver license law: effect on teenage drivers’ deaths through 2005.  J Safety Res. 2007;38(6):651-659.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Males  MA.  California’s graduated driver licensing ten years later: effects on motor vehicle fatalities and crashes through age 25.  Californian J Health Promot. 2013;11(1):23-35.Google Scholar
4.
Masten  SV, Foss  RD, Marshall  SW.  Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers.  JAMA. 2011;306(10):1098-1103.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Shope  JT, Molnar  LJ.  Graduated driver licensing in the United States: evaluation results from the early programs.  J Safety Res. 2003;34(1):63-69.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Block  AW, Walker  S.  2007 Motor Vehicle Occupant Safety Survey: Driver Education and Graduated Driver Licensing. Washington, DC: Office of Behavioral Safety Research, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2008.
7.
Goodwin  AH, Waller  MW, Foss  RD, Margolis  LH.  Parental supervision of teenage drivers in a graduated licensing system.  Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7(3):224-231.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Guttman  N.  “My son is reliable”: young drivers’ parents’ optimism and views on the norms of parental involvement in youth driving.  J Adolesc Res. 2013;28(2):241-268.Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Hartos  J, Huff  DC.  Parent attitudes toward integrating parent involvement into teenage driver education courses.  Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):224-230.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Mirman  JH, Kay  J.  From passengers to drivers: parent perceptions about how adolescents learn to drive.  J Adolesc Res. 2012;27(3):401-424.Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Foss  RD, Masten  S, Goodwin  AH, O'Brien  NP.  The Role of Supervised Driving in a Graduated Driver Licensing Program. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2012.
12.
Gill  SK, Shults  RA, Cope  JR, Cunningham  TJ, Freelon  B.  Teen driving in rural North Dakota: a qualitative look at parental perceptions.  Accid Anal Prev. 2013;54:114-121.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Goodwin  AH, Foss  RD, Margolis  LH, Waller  MW.  Parent, Teens and the Learner Stage of Graduated Driver Licensing. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2010.
14.
Mayhew  DR, Simpson  HM, Pak  A.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving.  Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35(5):683-691.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Curry  AE, Hafetz  J, Kallan  MJ, Winston  FK, Durbin  DR.  Prevalence of teen driver errors leading to serious motor vehicle crashes.  Accid Anal Prev. 2011;43(4):1285-1290.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
McKnight  AJ, McKnight  AS.  Young novice drivers: careless or clueless?  Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35(6):921-925.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Allen  RW, Park  GD, Cook  ML.  Simulator fidelity and validity in a transfer-of-training context.  Transp Res Rec. 2010;2185(1):40-47.Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Allen  RW, Park  GD, Cook  ML, Fiorentino  D. The effect of driving simulator fidelity on training effectiveness. Paper presented at: Driving Simulator Conference; September 12-14, 2007; Iowa City, Iowa.
19.
Beanland  V, Goode  N, Salmon  PM, Lenne  MG.  Is there a case for driver training? a review of the efficacy of pre- and post-licence driver training.  Saf Sci. 2013;51(1):127-137.Google ScholarCrossref
20.
Falkmer  T, Gregersen  N. The TRAINER project: the evaluation of a new simulator-based driver training methodology. In: Dorn L, ed.  Driver Behaviour and Training. Stratford-upon-Avon, England: International Conference on Driver Behaviour and Training; 2003:317-330.
21.
Fisher  DL, Pollatsek  AP, Pradhan  A.  Can novice drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their likelihood of a crash?  Inj Prev. 2006;12(suppl 1):i25-i29.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Boase  P, Tasca  L.  Graduated Licensing System Evaluation: Interim Report ’98. Toronto, ON: Safety Policy Branch, Ministry of Transportation; 1998. Report 0777877465.
23.
Gregersen  NP, Nyberg  A, Berg  H-Y.  Accident involvement among learner drivers: an analysis of the consequences of supervised practice.  Accid Anal Prev. 2003;35(5):725-730.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Hirsch  P, Maag  U, Laberge-Nadeau  C.  The role of driver education in the licensing process in Quebec.  Traffic Inj Prev. 2006;7(2):130-142.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
McCartt  AT, Teoh  ER, Fields  M, Braitman  KA, Hellinga  LA.  Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: a national study.  Traffic Inj Prev. 2010;11(3):240-248.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Nyberg  A, Gregersen  NP, Wiklund  M.  Practicing in relation to the outcome of the driving test.  Accid Anal Prev. 2007;39(1):159-168.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Pezoldt  VJ, Womack  KN, Morris  DE.  Parent-taught Driver Education in Texas: A Comparative Evaluation. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2007. Dept of Transportation HS 810 760.
28.
Stock  J, Weaver  J, Ray  H, Brink  J, Sadof  M.  Evaluation of Safe Performance: Secondary School Driver Education Curriculum Demonstration Project. Springfield, VA: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1983.
29.
Zhao  J, Mann  RE, Chipman  M, Adlaf  E, Stoduto  G, Smart  RG.  The impact of driver education on self-reported collisions among young drivers with a graduated license.  Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38(1):35-42.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Lewis-Evans  B.  Crash involvement during the different phases of the New Zealand Graduated Driver Licensing System (GDLS).  J Safety Res. 2010;41(4):359-365.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Elvik  R, Vaa  T.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2004.
32.
Lonero  LP.  Trends in driver education and training.  Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(3)(suppl):S316-S323.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Roberts  IG, Kwan  I; Cochrane Injuries Group Driver Education Reviewers.  School-based driver education for the prevention of traffic crashes.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD003201. PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Vernick  JS, Li  G, Ogaitis  S, MacKenzie  EJ, Baker  SP, Gielen  AC.  Effects of high school driver education on motor vehicle crashes, violations, and licensure.  Am J Prev Med. 1999;16(1)(suppl):40-46.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Mirman  JH, Curry  AE, Wang  W, Fisher Thiel  MC, Durbin  DR.  It takes two: a brief report examining mutual support between parents and teens learning to drive [published online October 21, 2013].  Accid Anal Prev. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Mirman  JH, Lee  YC, Kay  J, Durbin  DR, Winston  FK.  Development of a novel web-based parent support program to improve the quantity, quality, and diversity of teens’ home-based pre-licensure practice driving.  Transp Res Rec. 2012;2318(1):107-115.Google ScholarCrossref
37.
Hagge  RA.  The California Driver Performance Evaluation Project: An Evaluation of a New Driver Licensing Road Test. Sacramento: California Dept of Motor Vehicles, Division of Program and Policy Administration, Research and Development Section; 1994.
38.
Romanowicz  PA, Hagge  RA.  An Evaluation of the Validity of California's Driving Performance Evaluation Road Test. Sacramento: Research and Development Section, California Dept of Motor Vehicles; 1995.
39.
Mirman  JH, Curry  AE, Schultheis  MT, Brant  C, Winston  FK, Durbin  DR.  Development of an on-road driving assessment for learner teen drivers.  Transp Res Rec. In press.Google Scholar
40.
Willett  JB, Singer  JD.  Investigating onset, cessation, relapse, and recovery: why you should, and how you can, use discrete-time survival analysis to examine event occurrence.  J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(6):952-965.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Gebers  MA, Romanowicz  PA, Hagge  RA.  An Evaluation of the Impact of California's Driving Performance Evaluation Road Test on Traffic Accident and Citation Rates. Sacramento, CA: Dept of Motor Vehicles; 1998.
42.
Senserrick  T, Ivers  R, Boufous  S,  et al.  Young driver education programs that build resilience have potential to reduce road crashes.  Pediatrics. 2009;124(5):1287-1292.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
August 2014

Effect of the Teen Driving Plan on the Driving Performance of Teenagers Before Licensure: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 2Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 4Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 5Survey Methodology Program, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 6Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(8):764-771. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.252
Abstract

Importance  Many studies have failed to show an effect of parent-supervised practice driving on the driving performance of teenagers; nevertheless, most Graduated Driver Licensing programs have provisions that require supervised practice.

Objective  To determine whether a web-based intervention, the Teen Driving Plan (TDP), can improve the driving performance of teenagers before licensure as measured by the Teen On-road Driving Assessment (tODA).

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized, single-blind, clinical trial among 217 dyads (1 parent: 1 teenaged learner’s-permit holder) to test TDP effectiveness on increasing the quantity and diversity of supervised practice and improving the teenagers’ prelicensed driving performance. The study was conducted from December 2011 through January 2013 in Southeastern Pennsylvania.

Interventions  Dyads were randomized (3:2) to receive the TDP or the Pennsylvania driver’s manual (control group). The TDP is a psychoeducational intervention designed to increase the quantity and diversity of parent-supervised practice. Materials are grouped by the following driving environments: empty parking lots, suburban residential streets, intermediate (1- or 2-lane) roads, highways, rural roads with curves and elevation changes, and commercial districts.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The main outcomes were self-reported practice driving across 6 environments and 2 conditions and driving performance as measured by the teenagers’ completion of the standardized and validated tODA 24 weeks after enrollment. Certified professional driving evaluators blinded to randomization status terminated the tODA if they determined that the teenager could not safely complete it. We examined mean differences in the quantity of supervised practice, differences in the overall proportion of teenagers in each group that had assessments terminated for unsafe driving, and the point of termination during the assessment.

Results  The TDP dyads reported more practice in 5 of the 6 environments and at night and in bad weather compared with the control dyads. Overall, 5 of 86 TDP teenagers (6%) had the tODA terminated compared with 10 of 65 control teenagers (15%) (risk difference [TDP − control], −9% [95% CI, −21% to 2%]; P = .06). The hazard ratio for exposure to TDP was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.12-1.03; P = .05, log-rank test).

Conclusions and Relevance  Preliminary evidence suggests that the TDP improves supervised practice and the driving performance of prelicensed teenaged drivers. Future studies can explore how to revise the TDP to enhance the treatment effect and how best to disseminate the TDP without compromising implementation fidelity.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01498575

×