[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Special Feature
February 1998

Radiological Case of the Month

Author Affiliations

Copyright 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.1998

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(2):202. doi:
Denouement and Discussion: Retroperitoneal Lipoma in a 6-Month-Old Infant

Figure 1. Ultrasonogram. Top, Longitudinal view of the left side of the upper abdomen shows a 6×5×4-cm markedly echogenic mass with distinct margins to the kidney and the spleen. A indicates aorta; PS, psoas muscle; M, mass; and K, kidney. Bottom, Transverse view discloses medial and anterior displacement of the left kidney; the mass is clearly defined. A indicates aorta; M, mass; and K, kidney.

Figure 2. Radiograph of the abdomen and a urogram show a large homogeneous radiolucent mass in the left side of the upper abdomen. The small-bowel loops are displaced to the right side. The left kidney and the left ureter are displaced superomedially and anteriorly. There are no signs either of intrinsic renal involvement or of obstruction (note the double collecting system of the left kidney and ureter duplication).

Figure 3. A lobulated, well-encapsulated retroperitoneal fatty mass that was removed at operation.

The retroperitoneum is one of the most frequent locations of solid tumors in children. Differential diagnosis includes a wide range of possible pathological origins although 90% are Wilms tumors or neuroblastomas.1-3 Most of the remaining retroperitoneal masses, such as in multicystic kidney, hydronephrosis, or adrenal hemorrhage, can be excluded by ultrasonographic scanning.1 Retroperitoneal lipomatous tumors are very rare in children. A reported series of 190 cases of retroperitoneal tumors included only 2 lipomas.2 In general, these tumors are benign mature lipomas. Only a few tumors contain myxomatous liposarcomatous or well-differentiated liposarcomatous regions.4

Despite the rareness of retroperitoneal lipomas in children, the imaging characteristics are clearly defined.5,6 Homogeneous radiolucency visualized on an abdominal radiograph is a characteristic finding. This sign is produced by the fatty content of the tumor. Calcification within the tumor has not been noted. A urogram demonstrates displacement of the ipsilateral kidney and medial deviation of the ureter; however, there are no signs of intrinsic renal involvement or obstruction. Lateral displacement of the ureters would suggest pelvic location of the retroperitoneal mass.5

An ultrasonogram shows a typical picture of a homogeneous echogenic mass: high echogenicity being characteristic for fat. The tumors show distinct margins and sometimes a capsule or septation is demonstrated. High echogenicity pattern is altered if there is a myxomatous or sarcomatous area within the tumor.7

The combination of a radiograph, an intravenous pyelogram, and an ultrasonogram is typically used to diagnose retroperitoneal lipomas. Occasionally, additional imaging procedures are used to get information that will affect management. A computed tomographic scan confirms the homogeneous fatty composition with Houndsfield numbers in the range of normal fat.5,8,9 Magnetic resonance imaging will reveal an intense signal on T1-weighted images. Previous use of angiography for lipomas showed the tumors to be hypovascular.5

Almost all reported lipomatous tumors of the retroperitoneum were easily and completely resected. The tumors were well encapsulated, without any invasion of adjacent structures. Retroperitoneal lipomas in children rarely exhibit a malignant potential. While most children have had a long follow-up without tumor recurrences,5 the possibility of local recurrence after incomplete excision has been reported.4

Accepted for publication January 1, 1997.

Reprints: Wolfgang, Pumberger, MD, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.

Teele  RLShare  JC The abdominal mass in the neonate.  Semin Roentgenol. 1988;23175- 184Google ScholarCrossref
Hastings  NPollock  WFSnyder  W  Jr Retroperitoneal tumors in infants and children.  Arch Surg. 1961;82950- 973Google ScholarCrossref
Weitzner  SBlumenthal  BIMoynihan  PC Retroperitoneal lipoma in children.  J Pediatr Surg. 1979;1488- 90Google ScholarCrossref
Harvard  BM Retroperitoneal lipoma in children: report of case and review of literature.  J Urol. 1953;70159- 166Google Scholar
Bowen  AGaisie  GBron  K Retroperitoneal lipoma in children: choosing among diagnostic imaging modalities.  Pediatr Radiol. 1982;12221- 225Google ScholarCrossref
Young  LWSeverson  MVBurke  ECHattery  RR Radiological case of the month: retroperitoneal lipoma in a child.  AJDC. 1980;13483- 84Google Scholar
Behan  MKazam  E The echographic characteristics of fatty tissues and tumors.  Radiology. 1978;129143- 151Google Scholar
Friedman  ACHartman  DSSherman  JLautin  EMGoldman  M Computed tomography of abdominal fatty masses.  Radiology. 1981;139415- 429Google Scholar
Fisher  MFFletcher  BDDahms  BBHaller  JOFriedman  AP Abdominal lipoblastomatosis: radiographic, echographic, and computed tomographic findings.  Radiology. 1981;138593- 596Google Scholar