Randomized Trial of Breastfeeding Support in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants | Breastfeeding | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
May 2001

Randomized Trial of Breastfeeding Support in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Author Affiliations

From the School of Nursing (Dr Pinelli) and the Department of Pediatrics (Drs Atkinson and Saigal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; and the Children's Hospital of the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, Hamilton (Dr Pinelli).

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(5):548-553. doi:10.1001/archpedi.155.5.548

Objective  To determine if supplementary structured breastfeeding counseling (SSBC) for both parents compared with conventional hospital breastfeeding support (CHBS) improves the duration of breastfeeding in very low-birth-weight infants up to 1 year old.

Design  Randomized trial with longitudinal follow-up of infants at term, and ages 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (infant ages corrected for prematurity).

Setting  A tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and geographically defined region in central-west Ontario, Canada.

Participants  Parents of infants with a birth weight less than 1500 g, who planned to breastfeed.

Interventions  The SSBC consisted of viewing a video on breastfeeding for preterm infants; individual counseling by the research lactation consultant; weekly personal contact in the hospital; and frequent postdischarge contact through the infants' first year or until breastfeeding was discontinued. The CHBS group had standard breastfeeding support from regular staff members confined to the period of hospitalization in the NICU.

Main Outcome Measure  Duration of breastfeeding.

Results  At study entry, there were no statistically significant differences in major demographic characteristics between groups. The mean duration of breastfeeding was 26.1 weeks (SD = 20.8; median, 17.4) in the SSBC group and 24.0 weeks (SD = 20.5; median, 17.4) in the CHBS group (not statistically significant).

Conclusions  Long-term breastfeeding counseling of parents of very low-birth-weight infants in this study did not demonstrate a significant difference in duration of breastfeeding. These results may be explained by the high motivation to breastfeed in both groups, a relatively advantaged population, and the availability of community breastfeeding resources, which may have diminished any significant differences that could have resulted from a breastfeeding intervention. The results of this study, compared with previous studies of very low-birth-weight infants, indicate a new trend to longer duration of breastfeeding in preterm infants.

CURRENT guidelines in Canada and the United States recommend that the first choice for premature infant nutrition is fortified mother's milk.1,2 Recommendations from Canada include fortification of the milk until the infant is breastfeeding effectively, followed by exclusive breastfeeding until age 4 to 6 months (infant ages are corrected for prematurity).1 Despite these recommendations, there is a wide variation in the reported incidence of breastfeeding in very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants born preterm. The percentage of women who initiate breastfeeding ranges from 33% to 91%,3-6 with the incidence in the United States in the lower range,7-10 and Scandinavian countries at the higher ranges.11

The duration of breastfeeding in the preterm population, according to the reported literature, also varies widely and is confounded by the range of prematurity and the definition of breastfeeding in these studies. The duration reported in previous studies ranges from approximately 2 to 6 months, with a shorter duration of breastfeeding in infants born at very low gestational ages in comparison with the more mature preterm infants.4,5,7,8,11-14 Mothers of the very premature infants have significant difficulties in making the transition from expressing milk to feeding directly at the breast. Incidence of an inability to feed at the breast ranged from 37% to 79% in reported studies.4,5,14 During the initial hospitalization, establishing and maintaining a supply of milk must be initiated without the assistance of the infant and must rely primarily on artificial stimulation of the breast. Knowledge of breastfeeding for most parents does not include information on pumping and maintaining a milk supply for extended periods. Because of parental concerns for the infant, and/or maternal illness, initiation of pumping is often delayed, which may exacerbate difficulties in establishing an adequate supply of milk. Delayed initiation and the need to maintain a supply for long periods may result in perceived or actual deficiencies in milk supply. Not surprisingly, concerns related to milk production and transfer of milk to the infant are reported to be the primary reasons for discontinuing breastfeeding or for providing supplementation.5,11,15,16

There is no doubt that breastfeeding preterm infants poses greater challenges for mothers than the breastfeeding of infants carried to term. Health professionals who are involved with preterm infants and their mothers need to be knowledgeable of the issues related to breastfeeding, and of the specific interventions that are reported to enhance the success of breastfeeding in this population. To date, the issues related to pumping milk and establishing breastfeeding in hospital have received more attention than the problems with maintenance of breastfeeding after hospital discharge.

Interventions designed to enhance breastfeeding success through support of the mother–preterm infant dyad have been studied, but few randomized trials have been conducted. These studies used interventions that were primarily educational and supportive in nature, such as advice on breast milk expression and collection, nutritional information, emotional support, plans for postdischarge breastfeeding management, and general newborn care.10,17,18 While these nonexperimental studies reported an increase in the incidence and duration of breastfeeding as a result of their programs, 2 of the studies provided no data on the incidence or duration prior to initiation of the breastfeeding program.10,18

The main purpose of the present study was to determine whether a supplementary structured breastfeeding counseling program (SSBC) for parents of preterm infants, compared with conventional hospital-based breastfeeding support (CHBS), will improve the duration of lactation and the success of breastfeeding after discharge from the hospital, and up to age 1 year. This study also explored nutritional and neurodevelopmental outcomes, but these will be addressed in a separate article.

Subjects and methods


The setting for the study was a 33-bed, tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a teaching hospital that is the referral center for a geographically defined region in central-west Ontario, delivering approximately 29 000 infants per year. Inclusion criteria were: infants with birthweights less than 1500 g (VLBW), who were inborn or transferred with their mother within 72 hours of birth if they were outborn, and fed mother's milk by parental choice. Exclusion criteria were: multiple births; infants with severe congenital, surgical, or chromosomal abnormalities; and non–English-speaking parents. Fathers, as well as mothers, were included in this study because of the recognized importance of partners as a key support to breastfeeding success.19 The sample size was based on the difference between the success rate (approximately 10%) of breastfeeding at age 3 months at the initiation of the study, and the desired success rate defined for the study, which was 30%. Using proportional tables, α levels of .05, β levels of .2, and a 1-tailed test, 58 infants per group (116 infants total) were needed to detect a statistically significant difference between groups.20 Using formulation for survival analysis, the sample size calculation was somewhat smaller (103 infants).21 This type of analysis assumes that the drop-off rate of breastfeeding is exponential. In our experience and that of others,3,13-15 the rate of breastfeeding drops off fairly precipitously at about 6 to 8 weeks postnatally and may not be exponential. Therefore, we chose a conservative sample size of 128 infants.

All parents who met the inclusion criteria were approached by a research assistant to participate in the study. After obtaining informed consent, infants were stratified by birth weight (≤1000 g or >1000 g) and parents were randomly assigned, using random-number tables and sealed opaque envelopes, to receive either CHBS (n = 64 couples) or SSBC (n = 64 couples) within 72 hours of birth. The SSBC consisted of (1) viewing a video on breastfeeding preterm infants; (2) individual counseling by the research lactation consultant, who was not a member of the hospital staff; (3) weekly personal in-hospital contact; and (4) frequent postdischarge contact through the infant's first year or until breastfeeding was discontinued. The CHBS group had standard support confined to the period of hospitalization in the NICU, which included contact with the regular hospital staff (ie, nurses, nutritionists, neonatal nurse practitioners, physicians). No specialized breastfeeding clinic was available to parents in the hospital at the time of the study, and only a limited number of staff had any formal education in lactation or breastfeeding support.

Demographic and breastfeeding history and practice information was collected by means of self-administered questionnaires that were distributed to the mothers in both groups at study entry, prior to hospital discharge, and during 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Partners completed questionnaires separately from mothers at study entry and at the 6-month visit. The breastfeeding questionnaires were developed from the literature and from those used in previous research by one of this article's authors (J.P.).22 The questions included choices for set answers, as well as the opportunity for parents to write their comments. During hospitalization, the 24-hour volume of expressed milk was recorded once per week from the milk brought to the NICU. After discharge from the NICU, the infants were seen during their scheduled visits to the Growth and Development Clinic at the Children's Hospital of the Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation (Hamilton, Ontario), at the "due date," and at 3, 6, and 12 months of age. At each follow-up visit, the volume of a single feed intake was assessed by prebreastfeeding and postbreastfeeding test weights of infants done on an electric scale accurate to 1.0 g, and by feeding records and mother's report. Breastfeeding exclusivity, or percent human milk intake of total fluid intake, was determined using the following categories: greater than 80%, 50% to 80%, less than 50%, and no breastfeeding. These categories were based on the recommendations by Labbock and Krasovec,23 relating to definitions of breastfeeding.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed as groups were assigned at entry to the study. The initial analysis of the breastfeeding questionnaires was conducted using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome of interest in this study was the duration and success of breastfeeding. Duration of breastfeeding was measured as a continuous variable; that is, in weeks, and was analyzed using survival analysis techniques. For percent of human milk intake, breastfeeding exclusivity was analyzed using the χ2 test of proportions at each visit. Lastly, a Cox regression model was used to determine predictors of breastfeeding duration. The level of statistical significance was set at P<.05.


Study entry

The demographic variables of the study participants are presented in Table 1. Parents in both groups were generally aged in their late 20s to early 30s, white, living with a partner, and with a relatively high socioeconomic status. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the infant variables. The mean duration of months that mothers in both groups planned to breastfeed was 8 months (SD, 3.6 months; range, 0.5-24 months), which was similar to the mean duration they planned to stay home from work (7.6 months; SD, 7.8 months; range, 0-60 months). These results indicate that both cohorts of parents were highly committed to breastfeeding.

Table 1. 
Demographic Variables by Study Group*
Demographic Variables by Study Group*

Specific information about the type of pump used was not collected; however, most mothers in our NICU are encouraged to use an electric pump if they are intending to pump for longer than 1 month. In addition, the usual practice for gavage feeding preterm infants is to use an intermittent orogastric tube. Infants who will be breastfed are not usually given breast milk by bottle and will be gavage fed until breastfeeding is fully established or until the infant consistently demonstrates a negative reaction to the gavage tube, such as gagging.

The majority of mothers in both groups rated breastfeeding as very important, both for providing milk and for putting the infant to breast. Maternal perceptions of the importance of breastfeeding to their partners was reported as "very important." In addition, the majority of partners rated breastfeeding as "very important" to themselves as well as to their partners. The views of the partners regarding the duration the infant should breastfeed was similar to the plans of the mothers for breastfeeding; that is, approximately 8 months. At study entry, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any sociodemographic variables, decision to breastfeed, importance of breastfeeding, breastfeeding knowledge, and lifestyle factors.

Nicu breastfeeding experience

With respect to their breastfeeding experiences in the NICU, mothers in both groups reported similar findings. There were no differences between groups in the variables related to breast milk expression. Infants were put directly to breast at a mean ± SD age of 25 ± 23 days in the SSBC group, and at a mean ± SD age of 25 ± 18 days in the CHBS group (Table 2). About half of the mothers in the SSBC and CHBS groups (47% vs 53%, respectively) reported that the cost of the pump was "somewhat" of a burden, compared with an "extreme" burden (20% in both groups), or "not at all" (33% vs 27%, respectively). The main problem mothers reported having with breastfeeding in the NICU was a sleepy infant (39% vs 43% in SSBC and CHBS groups, respectively). The majority of infants in both groups were being gavage fed at the time of discharge from the NICU to the local community hospitals for convalescent care, with about 12% in both groups receiving some bottles.

Table 2. 
NICU Experience of Mothers: Comparison of Groups*
NICU Experience of Mothers: Comparison of Groups*

Breastfeeding experience at home

More than 50% of mothers in both groups experienced breastfeeding problems at home, as reported at the 6-month assessment. The greatest percentage of problems in both groups was reported at the 1-month assessment (94% vs 81% for SSBC and CHBS, respectively). Mothers in both groups reported several breastfeeding problems at home during all periods, including sore nipples, fatigue, not enough milk, infant not gaining weight, and infant not being interested in breastfeeding. There were no statistically significant differences between groups except for mothers' reports of the infant not gaining weight, which was more frequent in the SSBC group (P = .05). In both groups, mothers' reports of insufficient milk supply was the most frequent problem at home for all periods. Not surprisingly, the main reasons for discontinuing breastfeeding mirrored the problems experienced by the mothers. At all times, except at 12 months, mothers in both groups discontinued breastfeeding because they perceived that they were not producing enough breast milk. At 12 months, the main reason for discontinuation was that the infant was no longer interested in breastfeeding. It is important to note that none of the mothers in either group identified their partners as a reason for stopping breastfeeding at any given time.

Mothers in both groups reported using a wide variety of breastfeeding resources for solving breastfeeding problems at home, including health professionals, books, friends, and family. The large number of mothers who had public health nurses at the due date assessment likely reflects the fact that these infants were discharged home around that time. When all time periods were combined, the most used resource for advice on breastfeeding for both groups was the lactation consultant (which included the research lactation consultant in the study group and community lactation consultants in both groups).

Main outcome measures

The main outcome for this study was duration and success of breastfeeding to age 1 year. Figure 1 shows the analysis of breastfeeding duration based on the Kaplan-Meier test. The mean duration of breastfeeding was 26.2 weeks (SE, 2.7 weeks; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.0-31.5; median, 17.4 weeks) in the SSBC group, and 24.2 weeks (SE, 2.7 weeks; 95% CI, 19.0-29.4; median, 17.4 weeks) in the CHBS group, which was not significantly different. Percent of human milk intake was determined through single-feed prebreastfeeding and postbreastfeeding test weights, feeding records, and mother's report. Table 3 indicates that the breastfeeding exclusivity, by group, at all time periods was also not statistically significant. A Cox regression analysis on the combined sample determined smoking to be a significant negative factor (P = .003), and number of months planning to breastfeed to be a significant positive factor (P = .003) for breastfeeding duration. Nonsignificant factors were infant's gestational age, mother's time away from work, maternal age, parity, socioeconomic status, and total amount of milk pumped in 24 hours in the NICU.

Kaplan-Meier analysis of breastfeeding duration. CHBS indicates conventional hospital breastfeeding support; SSBC, supplementary structured breastfeeding counseling; and censored, only cases that experienced the terminal event (ie, discontinued breastfeeding by 12 months of corrected age).

Kaplan-Meier analysis of breastfeeding duration. CHBS indicates conventional hospital breastfeeding support; SSBC, supplementary structured breastfeeding counseling; and censored, only cases that experienced the terminal event (ie, discontinued breastfeeding by 12 months of corrected age).

Table 3. 
Breastfeeding Exclusivity by Supplementary Structured Breastfeeding Counseling (SSBC) and Conventional Hospital Breastfeeding Support (CHBS) Groups at All Time Periods*
Breastfeeding Exclusivity by Supplementary Structured Breastfeeding Counseling (SSBC) and Conventional Hospital Breastfeeding Support (CHBS) Groups at All Time Periods*


In this open, randomized trial, long-term breastfeeding support of parents of VLBW infants did not result in a significant difference in the duration of breastfeeding. The high motivation to breastfeed in both groups, prior breastfeeding experience, a relatively advantaged socioeconomic population, and the widespread availability of community resources (lactation consultants, public health nurses, family physicians, breastfeeding support groups) to support breastfeeding may have diminished any significant differences resulting from a breastfeeding support intervention. This study of parents of VLBW infants is unique in the inclusion of partners in the breastfeeding intervention and in the long-term follow-up of breastfeeding to age 1 year.

In a preintervention and postintervention study,12 counseling of mothers of infants in an NICU significantly increased the incidence and the mean duration of breastfeeding. However, the breastfeeding rates were higher among mothers who were white and privately insured, regardless of counseling. Similarly, positive effects of breastfeeding support in term infants from families with low socioeconomic status have been reported.25-28 Other intervention studies on VLBW infants have also demonstrated stronger and more consistent differences in cognition in infants from economically disadvantaged environments than in infants from middle-class families or families with high maternal education.29,30 It is possible that the intervention tested in the current study might demonstrate a difference in populations of VLBW infants of lower socioeconomic status, or at least in populations that are less homogeneous in terms of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and maternal education.

The results of this study, compared with those of retrospective studies in preterm infants, indicate a trend toward longer duration of breastfeeding. Previous studies of preterm infants indicate a mean duration of breastfeeding ranging from 1.8 to 5.6 months.4,5,7,8,11,12,14,15 It is difficult to compare studies, however, because of the lack of consistency in the definition of breastfeeding and in the wide range of the birth weights and maturity of the infants included in the studies. The breastfeeding exclusivity results from this study indicate that infants generally received either greater than 80% human milk intake or no human milk intake, with few infants receiving intakes between those percentages.

In this study, there was a significant number of mothers in whom milk supply continued to be problematic for much of the infant's first year of life. For these mothers, supportive interventions alone do not seem to influence breastfeeding success. As in other studies,31 cigarette smoking was a negative predictor of breastfeeding duration; thus, education to reduce or eliminate smoking might improve breastfeeding outcomes. Since the decision about planned duration of breastfeeding was a positive influence on breastfeeding outcome, early education of mothers to support such planning may be useful.

With respect to implications for clinical practice, the anecdotal and research literature suggest that supporting parents of preterm infants is important to breastfeeding success. The negative results of this study should not be perceived as an indication that breastfeeding support is not helpful. Further studies are required to determine the effectiveness of this model in a more disadvantaged population and those with limited access to community resources.

Accepted for publication November 30, 2000.

This study was funded by grant 6606-5242-VF from the National Health Research Development Program, Ottawa, Ontario.

Presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies & American Academy of Pediatrics Joint Meeting, San Francisco, Calif, May 2, 1999.

We gratefully acknowledge the statistical consultation provided by Harry Shannon, PhD. We would like to thank our research team: Janis Randall-Simpson, PhD, Susan Steele, RN, Michelle Whelan, RN, Miriam Chang, MSc, and Beverly Marchment, BSc. We especially thank the parents and infants who participated in the study.

Corresponding author: Janet Pinelli, RNC, Msc, DNS, Faculty of Health Sciences, Room 3N25D, McMaster University, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada (e-mail: pinellij@fhs.mcmaster.ca).

Nutrition Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Nutrient needs and feeding of premature infants.  CMAJ. 1995;1521765- 1785Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, Nutritional needs of preterm infants.  Pediatric Nutrition Handbook 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, Ill American Academy of Pediatrics1998;68- 70Google Scholar
Yip  ELee  JSheehy  Y Breast-feeding in neonatal intensive care.  J Paediatr Child Health. 1996;32296- 298Google ScholarCrossref
Kaufman  KJHall  LA Influences of the social network on choice and duration of breast-feeding in mothers of preterm infants.  Res Nurs Health. 1989;12149- 159Google ScholarCrossref
Lefebvre  FDucharme  M Incidence and duration of lactation and lactational performance among mothers of low-birth-weight and term infants.  CMAJ. 1989;1401159- 1164Google Scholar
Rajan  LOakley  A Infant feeding practice in mothers at risk of low birth weight delivery.  Midwifery. 1990;618- 27Google ScholarCrossref
Ehrenkranz  RAAckerman  BAMezger  JBracken  MB Breast-feeding and premature infants: incidence and success [abstract].  Pediatr Res. 1985;19199Google ScholarCrossref
Richards  MTLang  MDMcIntosh  C  et al.  Breastfeeding the VLBW infant: successful outcome and maternal expectations [abstract].  Pediatr Res. 1986;20388Google Scholar
Ryan  ASPratt  WFWysong  JLLewandowski  GMcNally  JWKrieger  FW A comparison of breast-feeding data from the National Surveys of Family Growth and the Ross Laboratories Mothers Surveys.  Am J Public Health. 1991;811049- 1052Google ScholarCrossref
Bell  EHGeyer  JJones  L A structured intervention improves breastfeeding success for ill or preterm infants.  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1995;20309- 314Google ScholarCrossref
Verronen  P Breast feeding of low birthweight infants.  Acta Paediatr Scand. 1985;74495- 499Google ScholarCrossref
Meberg  AWillgraff  SSande  HA High potential for breast feeding among mothers giving birth to pre-term infants.  Acta Paediatr Scand. 1982;71661- 662Google ScholarCrossref
Hill  PDLedbetter  RJKavanaugh  KL Breastfeeding patterns of low-birth-weight infants after hospital discharge.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26189- 197Google ScholarCrossref
Furman  LMinich  NMHack  M Breastfeeding of very low birth weight infants.  J Hum Lact. 1998;1429- 34Google ScholarCrossref
Hill  PDHanson  KSMefford  AL Mothers of low birthweight infants: breastfeeding patterns and problems.  J Hum Lact. 1994;10169- 176Google ScholarCrossref
Kavanaugh  KMead  LMeier  PMangurten  HH Getting enough: mothers' concerns about breastfeeding a preterm infant after discharge.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1995;2423- 32Google ScholarCrossref
Pereira  GRSchwartz  DGould  PGrim  N Breastfeeding in neonatal intensive care.  Perinatol Neonatol. 1984;835- 3739- 42Google Scholar
Meier  PPEngstrom  JLMangurten  HHEstrada  EZimmerman  BKopparthi  R Breastfeeding support services in the neonatal intensive-care unit.  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993;22338- 347Google ScholarCrossref
Kaufman  KJHall  LA Influences of the social network on choice and duration of breast-feeding in mothers of preterm infants.  Res Nurs Health. 1989;12149- 159Google ScholarCrossref
Fleiss  J Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY John Wiley1981;
Shuster  J CRC Handbook of Sample Size Guidelines for Clinical Trials.  Boca Raton, Fla CRC Press1990;
Pinelli  JMcGovern  MEdwards  MMilligan  M Evaluation of a breastfeeding protocol.  J Hum Lact. 1993;9223- 230Google ScholarCrossref
Labbok  MKrasovec  K Toward consistency in breastfeeding definitions.  Fam Plann. 1990;21226- 230Google ScholarCrossref
Hollingshead  AB Four factor index of social status.  New Haven, Conn Yale University Department of Sociology Working paper 1975;Google Scholar
Serafino-Cross  PDonovan  PR Effectiveness of professional breastfeeding home-support.  J Nutr Educ. 1992;24117- 122Google ScholarCrossref
Barron  SPLane  HWHannan  TEStruempler  BWilliams  JC Factors influencing duration of breastfeeding among low-income women.  J Am Diet. 1988;881557- 1561Google Scholar
Saunders  SECarroll  J Post-partum breastfeeding support: impact on duration.  J Am Diet Assoc. 1988;88213- 221Google Scholar
Houston  MHowie  ACMcNeilly  A Do breastfeeding mothers get the home support they need?  Health Bull. 1981;39166- 172Google Scholar
McCormick  MCMcCarton  CBrooks-Gunn  JBelt  PGross  RT The infant health and development program: interim summary.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19359- 370Google ScholarCrossref
Brooks-Gunn  JFong-ruey  LKlebanov  PK Effects of early intervention on cognitive function of low birth weight preterm infants.  J Pediatr. 1992;120350- 359Google ScholarCrossref
Hill  PDAldag  JC Smoking and breastfeeding status.  Res Nurs Health. 1996;19125- 132Google ScholarCrossref