Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors via the Internet | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Herzog  B, Gerberi  J. E-cigs revolutionizing the tobacco industry. http://www.smallcapfinancialwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/E-Cigs-Revolutionizing-the-Tobacco-Industry-Interactive-Model.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2014.
2.
Zhu  SH, Sun  JY, Bonnevie  E,  et al.  Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation.  Tob Control. 2014;23(suppl 3):iii3-iii9.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Corey  C, Wang  B, Johnson  SE,  et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Notes from the field: electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011-2012.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(35):729-730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Bunnell  RE, Agaku  IT, Arrazola  RA,  et al.  Intentions to smoke cigarettes among never-smoking US middle and high school electronic cigarette users: National Youth Tobacco Survey, 2011-2013.  Nicotine Tob Res. 2014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
E-cigarettes surpass tobacco cigarettes among teens [news release]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; December 16, 2014. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pressreleases/14cigpr.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2015.
6.
Bryant  JA, Cody  MJ, Murphy  ST.  Online sales: profit without question.  Tob Control. 2002;11(3):226-227.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Ribisl  KM, Williams  RS, Kim  AE.  Internet sales of cigarettes to minors.  JAMA. 2003;290(10):1356-1359.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Jensen  JA, Hickman  NJ  III, Landrine  H, Klonoff  EA.  Availability of tobacco to youth via the Internet.  JAMA. 2004;291(15):1837.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Williams  RS, Ribisl  KM, Feighery  EC.  Internet cigarette vendors’ lack of compliance with a California state law designed to prevent tobacco sales to minors.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(9):988-989.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Unger  JB, Rohrbach  LA, Ribisl  KM.  Are adolescents attempting to buy cigarettes on the internet?  Tob Control. 2001;10(4):360-363.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Fix  BV, Zambon  M, Higbee  C, Cummings  KM, Alford  T, Hyland  A.  Internet cigarette purchasing among 9th grade students in western New York: 2000-2001 vs 2004-2005.  Prev Med. 2006;43(3):191-195.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
King  BA, Tynan  MA, Dube  SR, Arrazola  R.  Flavored-little-cigar and flavored-cigarette use among US middle and high school students.  J Adolesc Health. 2014;54(1):40-46.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012 National Youth Tobacco Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/TOBACCO/data_statistics/surveys/NYTS/index.htm. Accessed May 20, 2014.
14.
Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 (PACT Act), Pub L No. 111-154, S 1147, 111th Cong (2010).
15.
Food and Drug Administration. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Regulations on the sale and distribution of tobacco products and required warning statements for tobacco products: a proposed rule by the Food and Drug Administration on April 25, 2014. http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/04/25/2014-09491/deeming-tobacco-products-to-be-subject-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-as-amended-by-the. Accessed October 6, 2014.
16.
National Conference of State Legislatures. Alternative nicotine products: electronic cigarettes. http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/alternative-nicotine-products-e-cigarettes.aspx. Accessed October 6, 2014.
17.
General Assembly of North Carolina. An Act to Prohibit the Distribution of Tobacco-Derived and Vapor Products to Minors, SL 2013-165 (S 530) (2013).
18.
Huang  J, Kornfield  R, Szczypka  G, Emery  SL.  A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter.  Tob Control. 2014;23(suppl 3):iii26-iii30.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Alexa Traffic Ranking. http://www.alexa.com. Accessed October 9, 2014.
20.
Williams  RS, Lewis  MJ, Ribisl  KM.  Effectiveness of age verification restrictions on tobacco co brand marketing websites.  J Public Health Policy. In press.Google Scholar
21.
Williams  RS, Ribisl  KM.  Internet alcohol sales to minors.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(9):808-813.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Abrams  SM, Hyland  A, Cummings  KM.  Internet cigarette purchasing among ninth-grade students in Western New York.  Prev Med. 2003;36(6):731-733.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Williams  RS.  Underage Internet alcohol sales on eBay.  Addiction. 2013;108(7):1346-1348.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Ribisl  KM, Williams  RS, Gizlice  Z, Herring  AH.  Effectiveness of state and federal government agreements with major credit card and shipping companies to block illegal Internet cigarette sales.  PLoS One. 2011;6(2):e16754.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Ribisl  KM, Kim  AE, Williams  RS. Sales and marketing of cigarettes on the Internet: emerging threats to tobacco control and promising policy solutions. In: Bonnie  RJ, Stratton  K, Wallace  RB, eds.  Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007:M1-M27.
26.
Ribisl  KM, Kim  AE, Williams  RS.  Are the sales practices of Internet cigarette vendors good enough to prevent sales to minors?  Am J Public Health. 2002;92(6):940-941.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Attorney General of the State of New York Health Care Bureau. In the matter of United Parcel Service: assurance of discontinuance. March 22, 2012. http://www.ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/press-releases/archived/9tiupsaodfinal.oct.pdf. Accessed October 12, 2005.
28.
Attorney General of the State of New York Health Care Bureau. In the matter of DHL holdings USA Inc, and DHL Express (USA) Inc: assurance of discontinuance. http://www.ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/press-releases/archived/dhlaogfinal.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2015.
29.
Attorney General of the State of New York Health Care Bureau. In the matter of Federal Express Corporation and FedEx Ground Package Systems Inc: assurance of compliance, 2006.
30.
Williams  RS, Ribisl  KM. Vendor compliance with bans on credit card payments and commercial shipping for online cigarette sales. Paper presented at: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; November 2, 2011; Washington, DC.
31.
Williams  RS, Ribisl  KM.  Internet cigarette vendor compliance with credit card payment and shipping bans.  Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(2):243-246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
March 2, 2015

Electronic Cigarette Sales to Minors via the Internet

Author Affiliations
  • 1Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • 2Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • 3Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):e1563. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.63
Abstract

Importance  Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) entered the US market in 2007 and, with little regulatory oversight, grew into a $2-billion-a-year industry by 2013. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported a trend of increasing e-cigarette use among teens, with use rates doubling from 2011 to 2012. While several studies have documented that teens can and do buy cigarettes online, to our knowledge, no studies have yet examined age verification among Internet tobacco vendors selling e-cigarettes.

Objective  To estimate the extent to which minors can successfully purchase e-cigarettes online and assess compliance with North Carolina’s 2013 e-cigarette age-verification law.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this cross-sectional study conducted from February 2014 to June 2014, 11 nonsmoking minors aged 14 to 17 years made supervised e-cigarette purchase attempts from 98 Internet e-cigarette vendors. Purchase attempts were made at the University of North Carolina Internet Tobacco Vendors Study project offices using credit cards.

Main Outcome and Measure  Rate at which minors can successfully purchase e-cigarettes on the Internet.

Results  Minors successfully received deliveries of e-cigarettes from 76.5% of purchase attempts, with no attempts by delivery companies to verify their ages at delivery and 95% of delivered orders simply left at the door. All delivered packages came from shipping companies that, according to company policy or federal regulation, do not ship cigarettes to consumers. Of the total orders, 18 failed for reasons unrelated to age verification. Only 5 of the remaining 80 youth purchase attempts were rejected owing to age verification, resulting in a youth buy rate of 93.7%. None of the vendors complied with North Carolina’s e-cigarette age-verification law.

Conclusions and Relevance  Minors are easily able to purchase e-cigarettes from the Internet because of an absence of age-verification measures used by Internet e-cigarette vendors. Federal law should require and enforce rigorous age verification for all e-cigarette sales as with the federal PACT (Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking) Act’s requirements for age verification in Internet cigarette sales.

×