Effects of Choice Architecture and Chef-Enhanced Meals on the Selection and Consumption of Healthier School Foods: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Adolescent Medicine | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
US Department of Agriculture.  National School Lunch Program: participation and lunches served.http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/01slfypart.htm. Accessed February 20, 2014.
Briefel  RR, Crepinsek  MK, Cabili  C, Wilson  A, Gleason  PM.  School food environments and practices affect dietary behaviors of US public school children.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2)(suppl):S91-S107.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis, Nutrition, and Evaluation (USDA/FNS).  Child Nutrition Program Operations Study, Second Year Report: Executive Summary. Alexandria, VA: USDA/FNS; June 1992.
US Department of Agriculture.  School Lunch and Breakfast Cost Study, II: summary of findings.http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/MealCostStudy.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2015.
Story  M.  The third School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study: findings and policy implications for improving the health of US children.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109(2)(suppl):S7-S13.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Chefs Move to Schools. http://www.chefsmovetoschools.org/.  Accessed February 27, 2014.
Cohen  JF, Smit  LA, Parker  E,  et al.  Long-term impact of a chef on school lunch consumption: findings from a 2-year pilot study in Boston middle schools.  J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(6):927-933.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Skov  LR, Lourenço  S, Hansen  GL, Mikkelsen  BE, Schofield  C.  Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self-service settings: a systematic review.  Obes Rev. 2013;14(3):187-196.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wright  M.  Smarter lunchroom movement fights childhood obesity.http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2014/03/smarter-lunchroom-movement-fights-childhood-obesity. Accessed March 28, 2014.
Wansink  B, Hanks  AS.  Slim by design: serving healthy foods first in buffet lines improves overall meal selection.  PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77055. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077055.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wansink  B, Just  DR, McKendry  J.  Lunch line redesign. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/10/21/opinion/20101021_Oplunch.html?_r=0. Accessed November 21, 2010.
Wansink  B.  Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers.  Annu Rev Nutr. 2004;24:455-479.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hanks  AS, Just  DR, Wansink  B.  Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity.  J Pediatr. 2013;162(4):867-869.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Nichols  PJ, Porter  C, Hammond  L, Arjmandi  BH.  Food intake may be determined by plate waste in a retirement living center.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(8):1142-1144.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Adams  MA, Pelletier  RL, Zive  MM, Sallis  JF.  Salad bars and fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary schools: a plate waste study.  J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(11):1789-1792.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Whitaker  RC, Wright  JA, Finch  AJ, Psaty  BM.  An environmental intervention to reduce dietary fat in school lunches.  Pediatrics. 1993;91(6):1107-1111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Wansink  B, Just  DR, Payne  CR, Klinger  MZ.  Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools.  Prev Med. 2012;55(4):330-332.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Wansink  B, Just  DR, Payne  CR.  Can branding improve school lunches?  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(10):967-968.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
May 2015

Effects of Choice Architecture and Chef-Enhanced Meals on the Selection and Consumption of Healthier School Foods: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Project Bread, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 5Departments of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(5):431-437. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3805

Importance  Little is known about the long-term effect of a chef-enhanced menu on healthier food selection and consumption in school lunchrooms. In addition, it remains unclear if extended exposure to other strategies to promote healthier foods (eg, choice architecture) also improves food selection or consumption.

Objective  To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of chef-enhanced meals and extended exposure to choice architecture on healthier school food selection and consumption.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A school-based randomized clinical trial was conducted during the 2011-2012 school year among 14 elementary and middle schools in 2 urban, low-income school districts (intent-to-treat analysis). Included in the study were 2638 students in grades 3 through 8 attending participating schools (38.4% of eligible participants).

Interventions  Schools were first randomized to receive a professional chef to improve school meal palatability (chef schools) or to a delayed intervention (control group). To assess the effect of choice architecture (smart café), all schools after 3 months were then randomized to the smart café intervention or to the control group.

Main Outcomes and Measures  School food selection was recorded, and consumption was measured using plate waste methods.

Results  After 3 months, vegetable selection increased in chef vs control schools (odds ratio [OR], 1.75; 95% CI, 1.36-2.24), but there was no effect on the selection of other components or on meal consumption. After long-term or extended exposure to the chef or smart café intervention, fruit selection increased in the chef (OR, 3.08; 95% CI, 2.23-4.25), smart café (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.87), and chef plus smart café (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.26-4.25) schools compared with the control schools, and consumption increased in the chef schools (0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.30 cups/d). Vegetable selection increased in the chef (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.83-3.54), smart café (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.46-2.50), and chef plus smart café schools (OR, 7.38, 95% CI, 5.26-10.35) compared with the control schools, and consumption also increased in the chef (0.16; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22 cups/d) and chef plus smart café (0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.19 cups/d) schools; however, the smart café intervention alone had no effect on consumption.

Conclusions and Relevance  Schools should consider both collaborating with chefs and using choice architecture to increase fruit and vegetable selection. Efforts to improve the taste of school foods through chef-enhanced meals should remain a priority because this was the only method that also increased consumption. This was observed only after students were repeatedly exposed to the new foods for 7 months. Therefore, schools should not abandon healthier options if they are initially met with resistance.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02309840