Comparative Effectiveness of Childhood Obesity Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial | Clinical Decision Support | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Ogden  CL, Carroll  MD, Kit  BK, Flegal  KM.  Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.  JAMA. 2014;311(8):806-814.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Wang  YC, Orleans  CT, Gortmaker  SL.  Reaching the Healthy People goals for reducing childhood obesity: closing the energy gap.  Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):437-444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Spear  BA, Barlow  SE, Ervin  C,  et al.  Recommendations for treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity.  Pediatrics. 2007;120(suppl 4):S254-S288.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Barton  M; US Preventive Services Task Force.  Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.  Pediatrics. 2010;125(2):361-367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Oude Luttikhuis  H, Baur  L, Jansen  H,  et al.  Interventions for treating obesity in children.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD001872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
National Committee for Quality Assurance.  2010 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures.http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/HEDISQM/HEDIS2010/2010_Measures.pdf. Accessed March 9, 2015.
7.
Taveras  EM, Gortmaker  SL, Hohman  KH,  et al.  Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the High Five for Kids study.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(8):714-722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
McCallum  Z, Wake  M, Gerner  B,  et al.  Outcome data from the LEAP (Live, Eat and Play) trial: a randomized controlled trial of a primary care intervention for childhood overweight/mild obesity.  Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;31(4):630-636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Wake  M, Baur  LA, Gerner  B,  et al.  Outcomes and costs of primary care surveillance and intervention for overweight or obese children: the LEAP 2 randomised controlled trial.  BMJ. 2009;339:b3308. doi:10.1136/bmj.b3308.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Huang  TT, Borowski  LA, Liu  B,  et al.  Pediatricians’ and family physicians’ weight-related care of children in the US.  Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(1):24-32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Masica  AL, Ballard  DJ.  The protean role of health care delivery organizations in comparative effectiveness research.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(12):1062-1064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Conway  PH, Clancy  C.  Transformation of health care at the front line.  JAMA. 2009;301(7):763-765.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Nihiser  AJ, Lee  SM, Wechsler  H,  et al.  Body mass index measurement in schools.  J Sch Health. 2007;77(10):651-671.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Thompson  JW, Card-Higginson  P.  Arkansas’ experience: statewide surveillance and parental information on the child obesity epidemic.  Pediatrics. 2009;124(suppl 1):S73-S82.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Taveras  EM, Blackburn  K, Gillman  MW,  et al.  First steps for mommy and me: a pilot intervention to improve nutrition and physical activity behaviors of postpartum mothers and their infants.  Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(8):1217-1227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Appel  LJ, Clark  JM, Yeh  HC,  et al.  Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice.  N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):1959-1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Haines  J, McDonald  J, O’Brien  A,  et al.  Healthy Habits, Happy Homes: randomized trial to improve household routines for obesity prevention among preschool-aged children.  JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(11):1072-1079.PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Woolford  SJ, Clark  SJ, Strecher  VJ, Resnicow  K.  Tailored mobile phone text messages as an adjunct to obesity treatment for adolescents.  J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(8):458-461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Smith  AJ, Skow  Á, Bodurtha  J, Kinra  S.  Health information technology in screening and treatment of child obesity: a systematic review.  Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):e894-e902.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Taveras  EM, Marshall  R, Horan  CM,  et al.  Rationale and design of the STAR randomized controlled trial to accelerate adoption of childhood obesity comparative effectiveness research.  Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;34(1):101-108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Taveras  EM, Marshall  R, Horan  CM,  et al.  Improving children’s obesity-related health care quality: process outcomes of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.  Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(1):27-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Kuczmarski  RJ, Ogden  CL, Guo  SS,  et al.  2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development.  Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;(246):1-190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Resnicow  K, DiIorio  C, Soet  JE, Ernst  D, Borrelli  B, Hecht  J.  Motivational interviewing in health promotion: it sounds like something is changing.  Health Psychol. 2002;21(5):444-451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Garg  AX, Adhikari  NK, McDonald  H,  et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.  JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223-1238.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Bell  LM, Grundmeier  R, Localio  R,  et al.  Electronic health record–based decision support to improve asthma care: a cluster-randomized trial.  Pediatrics. 2010;125(4):e770-e777.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Fiks  AG, Grundmeier  RW, Biggs  LM, Localio  AR, Alessandrini  EA.  Impact of clinical alerts within an electronic health record on routine childhood immunization in an urban pediatric population.  Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):707-714.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Keehbauch  J, Miguel  GS, Drapiza  L, Pepe  J, Bogue  R, Smith-Dixon  A.  Increased documentation and management of pediatric obesity following implementation of an EMR upgrade and education.  Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012;51(1):31-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Quattrin  T, Roemmich  JN, Paluch  R, Yu  J, Epstein  LH, Ecker  MA.  Treatment outcomes of overweight children and parents in the medical home.  Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):290-297.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Coppock  JH, Ridolfi  DR, Hayes  JF, St Paul  M, Wilfley  DE.  Current approaches to the management of pediatric overweight and obesity.  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014;16(11):343. doi:10.1007/s11936-014-0343-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Wake  M, Lycett  K, Clifford  SA,  et al.  Shared care obesity management in 3-10 year old children: 12 month outcomes of HopSCOTCH randomised trial.  BMJ. 2013;346:f3092. doi:10.1136/bmj.f3092.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Skelton  JA, Irby  MB, Beech  BM, Rhodes  SD.  Attrition and family participation in obesity treatment programs: clinicians’ perceptions.  Acad Pediatr. 2012;12(5):420-428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Skelton  JA, Irby  MB, Geiger  AM.  A systematic review of satisfaction and pediatric obesity treatment: new avenues for addressing attrition.  J Healthc Qual. 2014;36(4):5-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Boughn  J; Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  Medicaid EHR incentive program: making meaningful use work for pediatricians. http://www.cms.gov/eHealth/ListServ_PediatriciansMedicaidMeaningfulUse.html. Updated September 19, 2013. Accessed June 13, 2014.
Original Investigation
June 2015

Comparative Effectiveness of Childhood Obesity Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston
  • 2Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Obesity Prevention Program, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 5Allegheny County Health Department, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 6Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(6):535-542. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0182
Abstract

Importance  Evidence of effective treatment of childhood obesity in primary care settings is limited.

Objective  To examine the extent to which computerized clinical decision support (CDS) delivered to pediatric clinicians at the point of care of obese children, with or without individualized family coaching, improved body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) and quality of care.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We conducted a cluster-randomized, 3-arm clinical trial. We enrolled 549 children aged 6 to 12 years with a BMI at the 95% percentile or higher from 14 primary care practices in Massachusetts from October 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012. Patients were followed up for 1 year (last follow-up, August 30, 2013). In intent-to-treat analyses, we used linear mixed-effects models to account for clustering by practice and within each person.

Interventions  In 5 practices randomized to CDS, pediatric clinicians received decision support on obesity management, and patients and their families received an intervention for self-guided behavior change. In 5 practices randomized to CDS + coaching, decision support was augmented by individualized family coaching. The remaining 4 practices were randomized to usual care.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Smaller age-associated change in BMI and the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance measures for obesity during the 1-year follow-up.

Results  At baseline, mean (SD) patient age and BMI were 9.8 (1.9) years and 25.8 (4.3), respectively. At 1 year, we obtained BMI from 518 children (94.4%) and HEDIS measures from 491 visits (89.4%). The 3 randomization arms had different effects on BMI over time (P = .04). Compared with the usual care arm, BMI increased less in children in the CDS arm during 1 year (−0.51 [95% CI, −0.91 to −0.11]). The CDS + coaching arm had a smaller magnitude of effect (−0.34 [95% CI, −0.75 to 0.07]). We found substantially greater achievement of childhood obesity HEDIS measures in the CDS arm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.15-4.53]) and CDS + coaching arm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.25-5.41]) and higher use of HEDIS codes for nutrition or physical activity counseling (CDS arm, 45%; CDS + coaching arm, 25%; P < .001 compared with usual care arm).

Conclusions and Relevance  An intervention that included computerized CDS for pediatric clinicians and support for self-guided behavior change for families resulted in improved childhood BMI. Both interventions improved the quality of care for childhood obesity.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01537510

×