Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Neurodevelopment at 4 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Child Development | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Lozoff  B, Beard  J, Connor  J, Barbara  F, Georgieff  M, Schallert  T.  Long-lasting neural and behavioral effects of iron deficiency in infancy.  Nutr Rev. 2006;64(5, pt 2):S34-S43.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Radlowski  EC, Johnson  RW.  Perinatal iron deficiency and neurocognitive development.  Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:585.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Domellöf  M.  Iron requirements in infancy.  Ann Nutr Metab. 2011;59(1):59-63.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
de Benoist  B, McLean  E, Egli  I, Cogswell  M.  Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia 1993-2005: WHO Global Database on Anaemia. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
5.
Domellöf  M, Braegger  C, Campoy  C,  et al; ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition.  Iron requirements of infants and toddlers.  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58(1):119-129.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Szajewska  H, Ruszczynski  M, Chmielewska  A.  Effects of iron supplementation in nonanemic pregnant women, infants, and young children on the mental performance and psychomotor development of children: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91(6):1684-1690.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Berglund  SK, Westrup  B, Hägglöf  B, Hernell  O, Domellöf  M.  Effects of iron supplementation of LBW infants on cognition and behavior at 3 years.  Pediatrics. 2013;131(1):47-55.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Yao  AC, Moinian  M, Lind  J.  Distribution of blood between infant and placenta after birth.  Lancet. 1969;2(7626):871-873.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Farrar  D, Airey  R, Law  GR, Tuffnell  D, Cattle  B, Duley  L.  Measuring placental transfusion for term births: weighing babies with cord intact.  BJOG. 2011;118(1):70-75.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Yao  AC, Lind  J.  Placental transfusion.  AJDC. 1974;127(1):128-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
McDonald  SJ, Middleton  P, Dowswell  T, Morris  PS.  Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD004074.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Chaparro  CM, Neufeld  LM, Tena Alavez  G, Eguia-Líz Cedillo  R, Dewey  KG.  Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2006;367(9527):1997-2004.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine.  Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
14.
Andersson  O, Hellström-Westas  L, Andersson  D, Domellöf  M.  Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomised controlled trial [published online November 15, 2011].  BMJ. 2011;343:d7157.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.  Committee Opinion No.543: Timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth.  Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1522-1526.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Wechsler  D.  Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (Swedish Version). Stockholm, Sweden: Pearson Assessment; 2005.
17.
Henderson  SE, Sugden  DA, Barnett  A. Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (Swedish). Stockholm, Sweden: Pearson Assessment; 2007.
18.
Lantz  C, Melén  K.  Fine Motor Development at 1-7 Years of Age: An Evaluation and Correction of an Earlier Report [in Swedish]. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms läns landsting, Omsorgsnämnden; 1992.
19.
Schneck  CM, Henderson  A.  Descriptive analysis of the developmental progression of grip position for pencil and crayon control in nondysfunctional children.  Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44(10):893-900.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Squires  J, Twombly  E, Bricker  D, Potter  L.  ASQ-3 User’s Guide.3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co; 2009.
21.
Goodman  R.  The extended version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a guide to child psychiatric caseness and consequent burden.  J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40(5):791-799.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
American Academy of Pediatrics.  Scoring the informant-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.https://www.communitycarenc.org/media/files/scoring-informant-questionnaire.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2015.
23.
Tamura  T, Goldenberg  RL, Hou  J,  et al.  Cord serum ferritin concentrations and mental and psychomotor development of children at five years of age.  J Pediatr. 2002;140(2):165-170.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Gunnarsson  BS, Thorsdottir  I, Palsson  G, Gretarsson  SJ.  Iron status at 1 and 6 years versus developmental scores at 6 years in a well-nourished affluent population.  Acta Paediatr. 2007;96(3):391-395.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Andersson  O, Domellöf  M, Andersson  D, Hellström-Westas  L.  Effect of delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping on iron status and neurodevelopment at age 12 months: a randomized clinical trial.  JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(6):547-554.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Tamura  T, Hou  J, Goldenberg  RL, Johnston  KE, Cliver  SP.  Gender difference in cord serum ferritin concentrations.  Biol Neonate. 1999;75(6):343-349.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Domellöf  M, Lönnerdal  B, Dewey  KG, Cohen  RJ, Rivera  LL, Hernell  O.  Sex differences in iron status during infancy.  Pediatrics. 2002;110(3):545-552.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Yang  Z, Lönnerdal  B, Adu-Afarwuah  S,  et al.  Prevalence and predictors of iron deficiency in fully breastfed infants at 6 mo of age: comparison of data from 6 studies.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1433-1440.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Mercer  JS, Vohr  BR, Erickson-Owens  DA, Padbury  JF, Oh  W.  Seven-month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping.  J Perinatol. 2010;30(1):11-16.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health.  Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. London, England: RCOG Press; 2007.
Original Investigation
July 2015

Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping on Neurodevelopment at 4 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • 2The Habilitation Center, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
  • 3Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 4Department of Clinical Sciences, Unit for Pediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(7):631-638. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0358
Abstract

Importance  Prevention of iron deficiency in infancy may promote neurodevelopment. Delayed umbilical cord clamping (CC) prevents iron deficiency at 4 to 6 months of age, but long-term effects after 12 months of age have not been reported.

Objective  To investigate the effects of delayed CC compared with early CC on neurodevelopment at 4 years of age.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Follow-up of a randomized clinical trial conducted from April 16, 2008, through May 21, 2010, at a Swedish county hospital. Children who were included in the original study (n = 382) as full-term infants born after a low-risk pregnancy were invited to return for follow-up at 4 years of age. Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Movement ABC) scores (collected between April 18, 2012, and July 5, 2013) were assessed by a blinded psychologist. Between April 11, 2012, and August 13, 2013, parents recorded their child’s development using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ) and behavior using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. All data were analyzed by intention to treat.

Interventions  Randomization to delayed CC (≥180 seconds after delivery) or early CC (≤10 seconds after delivery).

Main Outcomes and Measures  The main outcome was full-scale IQ as assessed by the WPPSI-III. Secondary objectives were development as assessed by the scales from the WPPSI-III and Movement ABC, development as recorded using the ASQ, and behavior using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

Results  We assessed 263 children (68.8%). No differences were found in WPPSI-III scores between groups. Delayed CC improved the adjusted mean differences (AMDs) in the ASQ personal-social (AMD, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.8-4.7) and fine-motor (AMD, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.2-4.0) domains and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire prosocial subscale (AMD, 0.5; 95% CI, >0.0-0.9). Fewer children in the delayed-CC group had results below the cutoff in the ASQ fine-motor domain (11.0% vs 3.7%; P = .02) and the Movement ABC bicycle-trail task (12.9% vs 3.8%; P = .02). Boys who received delayed CC had significantly higher AMDs in the WPPSI-III processing-speed quotient (AMD, 4.2; 95% CI, 0.8-7.6; P = .02), Movement ABC bicycle-trail task (AMD, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.1-1.5; P = .03), and fine-motor (AMD, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.0-8.4; P = .01) and personal-social (AMD, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.6-8.3; P = .004) domains of the ASQ.

Conclusions and Relevance  Delayed CC compared with early CC improved scores in the fine-motor and social domains at 4 years of age, especially in boys, indicating that optimizing the time to CC may affect neurodevelopment in a low-risk population of children born in a high-income country.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01581489

×