Association of Child Poverty, Brain Development, and Academic Achievement | Child Development | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.236.187.155. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Suitts  S, Barba  P, Dunn  K. A new majority: low income students now a majority in the nation’s public schools. Southern Education Foundation website. http://www.southerneducation.org/Our-Strategies/Research-and-Publications/New-Majority-Diverse-Majority-Report-Series/A-New-Majority-2015-Update-Low-Income-Students-Now. Published 2015. Accessed June 17, 2015.
2.
Duncan  GJ, Brooks-Gunn  J.  Consequences of Growing Up Poor. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997.
3.
Haveman  R, Wolfe  B.  The determinants of children’s attainments: a review of methods and findings.  J Econ Lit. 1995;33(4):182978.Google Scholar
4.
Restuccia  D, Urrutia  C.  Intergenerational persistence of earnings: the role of early and college education.  Am Econ Rev. 2004;94(5):1354-1378.Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Duncan  GJ, Magnuson  K, Kalil  A, Ziol-Guest  K.  The importance of early childhood poverty.  Soc Indic Res. 2012;108(1):87-98.Google ScholarCrossref
6.
Fletcher  J, Wolfe  B.  Increasing our understanding of the health-income gradient in children.  Health Econ. 2014;23(4):473-486.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Milligan  K, Stabile  M.  Do child tax benefits affect the well-being of children? evidence from canadian child benefit expansions.  Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2011;3(3):175-205.Google ScholarCrossref
8.
Cunha  F, Heckman  JJ, Lochner  LJ, Masterov  DV.  Handbook of the Economics of Education: Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland; 2006:697812.
9.
Duyme  M, Dumaret  AC, Tomkiewicz  S.  How can we boost IQs of “dull children”? a late adoption study.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(15):8790-8794.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Dahl  G, Lochner  L.  The impact of family income on child achievement: evidence from the earned income tax credit.  Am Econ Rev. 2012;102(5):19271956.Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Duncan  GJ, Morris  PA, Rodrigues  C.  Does money really matter? estimating impacts of family income on young children’s achievement with data from random-assignment experiments.  Dev Psychol. 2011;47(5):1263-1279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Sanchez  M, Pollak  S.  Handbook of Developmental Social Neuroscience: Socioemotional Development Following Early Abuse and Neglect. Challenges and Insights From Translational Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2009:497-520.
13.
Rutter  M.  Achievements and challenges in the biology of environmental effects.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(suppl 2):17149-17153.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Champagne  FA, Curley  JP.  Epigenetic mechanisms mediating the long-term effects of maternal care on development.  Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009;33(4):593-600.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Evans  GW.  The environment of childhood poverty.  Am Psychol. 2004;59(2):77-92.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Chan  RC, Shum  D, Toulopoulou  T, Chen  EY.  Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues.  Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;23(2):201-216.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Hackman  DA, Farah  MJ, Meaney  MJ.  Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(9):651-659.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Noble  KG, Wolmetz  ME, Ochs  LG, Farah  MJ, McCandliss  BD.  Brain-behavior relationships in reading acquisition are modulated by socioeconomic factors.  Dev Sci. 2006;9(6):642-654.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Kishiyama  MM, Boyce  WT, Jimenez  AM, Perry  LM, Knight  RT.  Socioeconomic disparities affect prefrontal function in children.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(6):1106-1115.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Noble  KG, Engelhardt  LE, Brito  NH,  et al; PASS Network.  Socioeconomic disparities in neurocognitive development in the first two years of life.  Dev Psychobiol. 2015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Farah  MJ, Noble  KG, Hurt  HH. Poverty, privilege and the brain: empirical and ethical issues. In: Illes  J, ed.  Neuroethics in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005.
22.
Turrell  G, Lynch  JW, Kaplan  GA,  et al.  Socioeconomic position across the lifecourse and cognitive function in late middle age.  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):S43-S51.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Hanson  JL, Hair  N, Shen  DG,  et al.  Family poverty affects the rate of human infant brain growth.  PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e80954.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Noble  KG, Houston  SM, Brito  NH,  et al.  Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents.  Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(5):773-778.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Luby  JL, Barch  DM, Belden  A,  et al.  Maternal support in early childhood predicts larger hippocampal volumes at school age.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(8):2854-2859.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Luby  J, Belden  A, Botteron  K,  et al.  The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: the mediating effect of caregiving and stressful life events.  JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(12):1135-1142.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Gilmore  JH, Schmitt  JE, Knickmeyer  RC,  et al.  Genetic and environmental contributions to neonatal brain structure: a twin study.  Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31(8):1174-1182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Fuster  JM.  The prefrontal cortex: an update. time is of the essence.  Neuron. 2001;30(2):319-333.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Jobard  G, Crivello  F, Tzourio-Mazoyer  N.  Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: a metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies.  Neuroimage. 2003;20(2):693-712.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Squire  LR.  Declarative and nondeclarative memory: multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory.  J Cogn Neurosci. 1992;4(3):232-243.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Whitehurst  G, Fischel  J.  Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome. Developmental Model of Reading and Language Impairments Arising in Conditions of Economic Poverty. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press; 2000:53–71.
32.
Eckert  MA, Lombardino  LJ, Leonard  CM.  Planar asymmetry tips the phonological playground and environment raises the bar.  Child Dev. 2001;72(4):988-1002.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Brasted  PJ, Bussey  TJ, Murray  EA, Wise  SP.  Role of the hippocampal system in associative learning beyond the spatial domain.  Brain. 2003;126(pt 5):1202-1223.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Waber  DP, De Moor  C, Forbes  PW,  et al; Brain Development Cooperative Group.  The NIH MRI study of normal brain development: performance of a population based sample of healthy children aged 6 to 18 years on a neuropsychological battery.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13(5):729-746.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
TP Corporation.  WASI Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace & Co; 1999.
36.
Woodcock  RW, McGrew  KS, Mather  N.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing; 2001.
37.
Giedd  JN, Rapoport  JL.  Structural MRI of pediatric brain development: what have we learned and where are we going?  Neuron. 2010;67(5):728-734.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Giedd  JN, Blumenthal  J, Jeffries  NO,  et al.  Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study.  Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(10):861-863.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Preacher  KJ, Hayes  AF.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models.  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004;36(4):717-731.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
September 2015

Association of Child Poverty, Brain Development, and Academic Achievement

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 2Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
  • 3Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
  • 4Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
  • 5La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
  • 6Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
  • 7Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(9):822-829. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1475
Abstract

Importance  Children living in poverty generally perform poorly in school, with markedly lower standardized test scores and lower educational attainment. The longer children live in poverty, the greater their academic deficits. These patterns persist to adulthood, contributing to lifetime-reduced occupational attainment.

Objective  To determine whether atypical patterns of structural brain development mediate the relationship between household poverty and impaired academic performance.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Longitudinal cohort study analyzing 823 magnetic resonance imaging scans of 389 typically developing children and adolescents aged 4 to 22 years from the National Institutes of Health Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Normal Brain Development with complete sociodemographic and neuroimaging data. Data collection began in November 2001 and ended in August 2007. Participants were screened for a variety of factors suspected to adversely affect brain development, recruited at 6 data collection sites across the United States, assessed at baseline, and followed up at 24-month intervals for a total of 3 periods. Each study center used community-based sampling to reflect regional and overall US demographics of income, race, and ethnicity based on the US Department of Housing and Urban Development definitions of area income. One-quarter of sample households reported the total family income below 200% of the federal poverty level. Repeated observations were available for 301 participants.

Exposure  Household poverty measured by family income and adjusted for family size as a percentage of the federal poverty level.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Children’s scores on cognitive and academic achievement assessments and brain tissue, including gray matter of the total brain, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and hippocampus.

Results  Poverty is tied to structural differences in several areas of the brain associated with school readiness skills, with the largest influence observed among children from the poorest households. Regional gray matter volumes of children below 1.5 times the federal poverty level were 3 to 4 percentage points below the developmental norm (P < .05). A larger gap of 8 to 10 percentage points was observed for children below the federal poverty level (P < .05). These developmental differences had consequences for children’s academic achievement. On average, children from low-income households scored 4 to 7 points lower on standardized tests (P < .05). As much as 20% of the gap in test scores could be explained by maturational lags in the frontal and temporal lobes.

Conclusions and Relevance  The influence of poverty on children’s learning and achievement is mediated by structural brain development. To avoid long-term costs of impaired academic functioning, households below 150% of the federal poverty level should be targeted for additional resources aimed at remediating early childhood environments.

×