Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study | Child Development | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Srinivasan  G, Pildes  RS, Cattamanchi  G, Voora  S, Lilien  LD.  Plasma glucose values in normal neonates: a new look.  J Pediatr. 1986;109(1):114-117.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Koivisto  M, Blanco-Sequeiros  M, Krause  U.  Neonatal symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycaemia: a follow-up study of 151 children.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972;14(5):603-614.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Kinnala  A, Rikalainen  H, Lapinleimu  H, Parkkola  R, Kormano  M, Kero  P.  Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography findings after neonatal hypoglycemia.  Pediatrics. 1999;103(4, pt 1):724-729.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Griffiths  AD, Bryant  GM.  Assessment of effects of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a study of 41 cases with matched controls.  Arch Dis Child. 1971;46(250):819-827.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Brand  PL, Molenaar  NL, Kaaijk  C, Wierenga  WS.  Neurodevelopmental outcome of hypoglycaemia in healthy, large for gestational age, term newborns.  Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(1):78-81.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Fluge  G.  Neurological findings at follow-up in neonatal hypoglycaemia.  Acta Paediatr Scand. 1975;64(4):629-634.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Yamaguchi  K, Mishina  J, Mitsuishi  C, Takamura  T, Nishida  H.  Follow-up study of neonatal hypoglycemia.  Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39(suppl 1):S51-S53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Lucas  A, Morley  R, Cole  TJ.  Adverse neurodevelopmental outcome of moderate neonatal hypoglycaemia.  BMJ. 1988;297(6659):1304-1308.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Haworth  JC, McRae  KN.  Neonatal hypoglycemia: a six-year experience.  J Lancet. 1967;87(2):41-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Singh  M, Singhal  PK, Paul  VK,  et al.  Neurodevelopmental outcome of asymptomatic & symptomatic babies with neonatal hypoglycaemia.  Indian J Med Res. 1991;94:6-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Adamkin  DH; Committee on Fetus and Newborn.  Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants.  Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):575-579.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Hay  WW  Jr, Raju  TN, Higgins  RD, Kalhan  SC, Devaskar  SU.  Knowledge gaps and research needs for understanding and treating neonatal hypoglycemia: workshop report from Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.  J Pediatr. 2009;155(5):612-617.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Cornblath  M, Hawdon  JM, Williams  AF,  et al.  Controversies regarding definition of neonatal hypoglycemia: suggested operational thresholds.  Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):1141-1145.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Duvanel  CB, Fawer  CL, Cotting  J, Hohlfeld  P, Matthieu  JM.  Long-term effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on brain growth and psychomotor development in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants.  J Pediatr. 1999;134(4):492-498.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Boluyt  N, van Kempen  A, Offringa  M.  Neurodevelopment after neonatal hypoglycemia: a systematic review and design of an optimal future study.  Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2231-2243.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Pildes  RS, Cornblath  M, Warren  I,  et al.  A prospective controlled study of neonatal hypoglycemia.  Pediatrics. 1974;54(1):5-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Haworth  JC, McRae  KN, Dilling  LA.  Prognosis of infants of diabetic mothers in relation to neonatal hypoglycaemia.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 1976;18(4):471-479.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Tin  W, Brunskill  G, Kelly  T, Fritz  S.  15-year follow-up of recurrent “hypoglycemia” in preterm infants.  Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):e1497-e1503. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0776.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Hillemeier  MM, Morgan  PL, Farkas  G, Maczuga  SA.  Perinatal and socioeconomic risk factors for variable and persistent cognitive delay at 24 and 48 months of age in a national sample.  Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(7):1001-1010.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Gisselmann  M, Koupil  I, De Stavola  BL.  The combined influence of parental education and preterm birth on school performance.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(9):764-769.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Williams  BL, Dunlop  AL, Kramer  M, Dever  BV, Hogue  C, Jain  L.  Perinatal origins of first-grade academic failure: role of prematurity and maternal factors.  Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):693-700.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Wild  KT, Betancourt  LM, Brodsky  NL, Hurt  H.  The effect of socioeconomic status on the language outcome of preterm infants at toddler age.  Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(9):743-746.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Potijk  MR, Kerstjens  JM, Bos  AF, Reijneveld  SA, de Winter  AF.  Developmental delay in moderately preterm–born children with low socioeconomic status: risks multiply.  J Pediatr. 2013;163(5):1289-1295.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Canadian Paediatric Society.  Screening guidelines for newborns at risk for low blood glucose.  Paediatr Child Health. 2004;9(10):723-740.PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Annie E. Casey Foundation.  Early Warning Confirmed: A Research Update on Third-Grade Reading. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2013.
26.
McKinsey & Company.  The economic impact of the achievement gap in America’s schools.http://mckinseyonsociety.com/the-economic-impact-of-the-achievement-gap-in-americas-schools/. Published April 2009. Accessed July 8, 2015.
27.
Hanushek  EA, Jamison  DT, Jamison  EA, Woessmann  L.  Education and economic growth: it’s not just going to school, but learning something while there that matters.  Educ Next. 2008;8:62-70.Google Scholar
28.
Hanushek  EA, Kimko  DD.  Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations.  Am Econ Rev. 2000;90:1184-1208.Google ScholarCrossref
29.
Harris  PA, Taylor  R, Thielke  R, Payne  J, Gonzalez  N, Conde  JG.  Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.  J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-381.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Holland  G.  Knowledge-Driven Identity Resolution for Longitudinal Education Data. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock; 2010.
31.
Kirkegaard  I, Obel  C, Hedegaard  M, Henriksen  TB.  Gestational age and birth weight in relation to school performance of 10-year-old children: a follow-up study of children born after 32 completed weeks.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1600-1606.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Johnson  S, Hennessy  E, Smith  R, Trikic  R, Wolke  D, Marlow  N.  Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure study.  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(4):F283-F289.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Hutchinson  EA, De Luca  CR, Doyle  LW, Roberts  G, Anderson  PJ; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group.  School-age outcomes of extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2013;132(4):780].  Pediatrics. 2013;131(4):e1053-e1061. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2311.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Schuirmann  DJ.  A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15(6):657-680.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Walker  E, Nowacki  AS.  Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing.  J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(2):192-196.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Harris  DL, Weston  PJ, Harding  JE.  Incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in babies identified as at risk.  J Pediatr. 2012;161(5):787-791.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Tin  W.  Defining neonatal hypoglycaemia: a continuing debate.  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(1):27-32.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Barker  DJP, Winter  PD, Osmond  C, Margetts  B, Simmonds  SJ.  Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease.  Lancet. 1989;2(8663):577-580.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
October 2015

Association Between Transient Newborn Hypoglycemia and Fourth-Grade Achievement Test Proficiency: A Population-Based Study

Author Affiliations
  • 1Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 3Section of Biostatistics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
  • 4Arkansas Research Center, University of Central Arkansas, Conway
  • 5Health Statistics Branch, Center for Public Health Practice, Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock
  • 6currently with Samumed, LLC, San Diego, California
  • 7Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 8Section of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(10):913-921. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1631
Abstract

Importance  Prolonged neonatal hypoglycemia is associated with poor long-term neurocognitive function. However, little is known about an association between early transient newborn hypoglycemia and academic achievement.

Objective  To determine if early (within the first 3 hours of life) transient hypoglycemia (a single initial low glucose concentration, followed by a second value above a cutoff) is associated with subsequent poor academic performance.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A retrospective population-based cohort study of all infants born between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences who had at least 1 recorded glucose concentration (a universal newborn glucose screening policy was in effect) was conducted. Medical record data from newborns with normoglycemia or transient hypoglycemia were matched with their student achievement test scores in 2008 from the Arkansas Department of Education and anonymized. Logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the association between transient hypoglycemia and school-age achievement test proficiency based on perinatal factors. Common hypoglycemia cutoffs of a glucose level less than 35 mg/dL (primary) and less than 40 and 45 mg/dL (secondary) were investigated. All 1943 normoglycemic and transiently hypoglycemic infants (23-42 weeks’ gestation) were eligible for inclusion in the study. Infants with prolonged hypoglycemia, congenital anomalies, or chromosomal abnormalities were excluded from the study.

Exposure  Hypoglycemia as a newborn.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was proficiency on fourth-grade literacy and mathematics achievement tests at age 10 years. We hypothesized a priori that newborns with early transient hypoglycemia would be less proficient on fourth-grade achievement tests compared with normoglycemic newborns.

Results  Perinatal data were matched with fourth-grade achievement test scores in 1395 newborn-student pairs (71.8%). Transient hypoglycemia (glucose level <35, <40, and <45 mg/dL) was observed in 6.4% (89 of 1395), 10.3% (143 of 1395), and 19.3% (269 of 1395) of newborns, respectively. After controlling for gestational age group, race, sex, multifetal gestation, insurance status, maternal educational level and socioeconomic status, and gravidity, transient hypoglycemia was associated with decreased probability of proficiency on literacy and mathematics fourth-grade achievement tests. For the 3 hypoglycemia cutoffs, the adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) for literacy were 0.49 (0.28-0.83), 0.43 (0.28-0.67), and 0.62 (0.45-0.85), respectively, and the adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) for mathematics were 0.49 (0.29-0.82), 0.51 (0.34-0.78), and 0.78 (0.57-1.08), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance  Early transient newborn hypoglycemia was associated with lower achievement test scores at age 10 years. Given that our findings are serious and contrary to expert opinion, the results need to be validated in other populations before universal newborn glucose screening should be adopted.

×