Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Sun Protection Program for Young Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Cancer Screening, Prevention, Control | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Diao  DY, Lee  TK.  Sun-protective behaviors in populations at high risk for skin cancer.  Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013;7:9-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
US Cancer Statistics Working Group.  United States Cancer Statistics: 1999-2011. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Cancer Institute; 2014.
3.
Dennis  LK, Vanbeek  MJ, Beane Freeman  LE, Smith  BJ, Dawson  DV, Coughlin  JA.  Sunburns and risk of cutaneous melanoma: does age matter? a comprehensive meta-analysis.  Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(8):614-627.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Elwood  JM, Jopson  J.  Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies.  Int J Cancer. 1997;73(2):198-203.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Balk  SJ, O’Connor  KG, Saraiya  M.  Counseling parents and children on sun protection: a national survey of pediatricians.  Pediatrics. 2004;114(4):1056-1064.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Hall  HI, McDavid  K, Jorgensen  CM, Kraft  JM.  Factors associated with sunburn in white children aged 6 months to 11 years.  Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(1):9-14.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gallagher  RP, Rivers  JK, Lee  TK, Bajdik  CD, McLean  DI, Coldman  AJ.  Broad-spectrum sunscreen use and the development of new nevi in white children: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2000;283(22):2955-2960.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Smith  A, Harrison  S, Nowak  M, Buettner  P, Maclennan  R.  Changes in the pattern of sun exposure and sun protection in young children from tropical Australia.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68(5):774-783.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Harrison  SL, Buettner  PG, Maclennan  R.  The North Queensland “Sun-Safe Clothing” study: design and baseline results of a randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of sun-protective clothing in preventing melanocytic nevi.  Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(6):536-545.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
State and County QuickFacts. US Census Bureau website. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html. Accessed January 8, 2016.
11.
Andrade  AC, Onate  A, Reidy  K, Hultgren  B.  Sun protection read-along books to support pediatricians’ anticipatory guidance.  Patient Educ Couns. In press.Google Scholar
12.
Eilers  S, Bach  DQ, Gaber  R,  et al.  Accuracy of self-report in assessing Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I through VI.  JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(11):1289-1294.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Ho  BK, Robinson  JK.  Color bar tool for skin type self-identification: a cross-sectional study.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(2):312-313.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Cronbach  LJ.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.  Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555.Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Jaccard  J.  Interaction Effects in Factorial Analysis of Variance. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1998.
16.
Cokkinides  V, Weinstock  M, Glanz  K, Albano  J, Ward  E, Thun  M.  Trends in sunburns, sun protection practices, and attitudes toward sun exposure protection and tanning among US adolescents, 1998-2004.  Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):853-864.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Saraiya  M, Glanz  K, Briss  PA,  et al.  Interventions to prevent skin cancer by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation: a systematic review.  Am J Prev Med. 2004;27(5):422-466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Mahé  E, Beauchet  A, de Maleissye  MF, Saiag  P.  Are sunscreens luxury products?  J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(3):e73-e79.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Banks  BA, Silverman  RA, Schwartz  RH, Tunnessen  WW  Jr.  Attitudes of teenagers toward sun exposure and sunscreen use.  Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):40-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Cohen  L, Brown  J, Haukness  H, Walsh  L, Robinson  JK.  Sun protection counseling by pediatricians has little effect on parent and child sun protection behavior.  J Pediatr. 2013;162(2):381-386.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Bhave  N, Reidy  K, Randall Kinsella  T, Brodsky  AL, Robinson  JK.  Caregivers’ response to pediatric clinicians sun protection anticipatory guidance: sun protective swim shirts for 2-6 year old children.  J Community Med Health Educ. 2014;4(4):316-325.Google Scholar
22.
Akamine  KL, Gustafson  CJ, Davis  SA, Levender  MM, Feldman  SR.  Trends in sunscreen recommendation among US physicians.  JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(1):51-55.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Crane  LA, Deas  A, Mokrohisky  ST,  et al.  A randomized intervention study of sun protection promotion in well-child care.  Prev Med. 2006;42(3):162-170.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Glasser  A, Shaheen  M, Glenn  BA, Bastani  R.  The sun sense study: an intervention to improve sun protection in children.  Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(4):500-510.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Buller  DB, Burgoon  M, Hall  JR,  et al.  Using language intensity to increase the success of a family intervention to protect children from ultraviolet radiation: predictions from language expectancy theory.  Prev Med. 2000;30(2):103-113.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Cynthia Baker, Graham A Barden  III, Brown  OW,  et al; Geoffrey R Simon; Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine; Bright Futures Periodicity Schedule Workgroup.  2014 recommendations for pediatric preventive health care.  Pediatrics. 2014;133(3):568-570.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Golova  N, Alario  AJ, Vivier  PM, Rodriguez  M, High  PC.  Literacy promotion for Hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial.  Pediatrics. 1999;103(5, pt 1):993-997.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Needlman  R, Fried  LE, Morley  DS, Taylor  S, Zuckerman  B.  Clinic-based intervention to promote literacy: a pilot study.  Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(8):881-884.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Sanders  LM, Gershon  TD, Huffman  LC, Mendoza  FS.  Prescribing books for immigrant children: a pilot study to promote emergent literacy among the children of Hispanic immigrants.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(8):771-777.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
April 2016

Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Sun Protection Program for Young Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • 2Advocate Children’s Hospital, Park Ridge and Oak Lawn, Illinois
  • 3Biobehavioral Health and Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
  • 4Editor, JAMA Dermatology
JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(4):334-342. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4373
Abstract

Importance  Emphasizing sun protection behaviors among young children may minimize sun damage and foster lifelong sun protection behaviors that will reduce the likelihood of developing skin cancer, especially melanoma.

Objective  To determine whether a multicomponent sun protection program delivered in pediatric clinics during the summer could increase summertime sun protection among young children.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized controlled clinical trial with 4-week follow-up that included 300 parents or relatives (hereafter simply referred to as caregivers [mean age, 36.0 years]) who brought the child (2-6 years of age) in their care to an Advocate Medical Group clinic during the period from May 15 to August 14, 2015. Of the 300 caregiver-child pairs, 153 (51.0%) were randomly assigned to receive a read-along book, swim shirt, and weekly text-message reminders related to sun protection behaviors (intervention group) and 147 (49.0%) were randomly assigned to receive the information usually provided at a well-child visit (control group). Data analysis was performed from August 20 to 30, 2015.

Intervention  Multicomponent sun protection program composed of a read-along book, swim shirt, and weekly text-message reminders related to sun protection behaviors.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Outcomes were caregiver-reported use of sun protection by the child (seeking shade and wearing sun-protective clothing and sunscreen) using a 5-point Likert scale, duration of outdoor activities, and number of children who had sunburn or skin irritation. The biologic measurement of the skin pigment of a child’s arm was performed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and 4 weeks later.

Results  Of the 300 caregiver-child pairs, the 153 children in the intervention group had significantly higher scores related to sun protection behaviors on both sunny (mean [SE], 15.748 [0.267] for the intervention group; mean [SE], 14.780 [0.282] for the control group; mean difference, 0.968) and cloudy days (mean [SE], 14.286 [0.282] for the intervention group; mean [SE], 12.850 [0.297] for the control group; mean difference, 1.436). Examination of pigmentary changes by spectrophotometry revealed that the children in the control group significantly increased their melanin levels, whereas the children in the intervention group did not have a significant change in melanin level on their protected upper arms (P < .001 for skin type 1, P = .008 for skin type 2, and P < .001 for skin types 4-6).

Conclusions and Relevance  A multicomponent intervention using text-message reminders and distribution of read-along books and swim shirts was associated with increased sun protection behaviors among young children. This was corroborated by a smaller change in skin pigment among children receiving the intervention. This implementable program can help augment anticipatory sun protection guidance in pediatric clinics and decrease children’s future skin cancer risk.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02376517

×