[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 52.200.130.163. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 643
Citations 0
Research Letter
May 2017

Association Between Family Characteristics and the Effect of Timing of Regular Egg Introduction in Infant Egg Allergy

Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
  • 2School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • 3School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Women’s and Children’s Health Network, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • 4Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(5):489-490. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4978

A recent systematic review of 5 randomized clinical trials, most with fewer than 300 participants completing the individual studies, found that early egg introduction was associated with reduced egg allergy.1 Infant feeding guidelines are changing to recommend that traditionally allergenic foods, such as eggs, be included in infant diets from 4 to 6 months of age, without exact knowledge of generalizability to different population subgroups.

At about the same time the systematic review1 was published, we reported the multicenter Starting Time of Egg Protein (STEP) double-blinded randomized clinical trial (n = 820 infants)2 that found a 25% risk reduction in egg allergy with early regular egg intake from 4 to 6.5 months compared with egg avoidance to 10 months of age, although this did not achieve statistical significance. We had broad eligibility criteria in STEP and investigated in exploratory analyses whether the effect of treatment was modified by maternal, family, or infant characteristics.

Methods

In STEP, infants were randomized to receive daily egg powder (egg group, n = 407) or a color- and texture-matched rice powder (control group, n = 413) to 10 months of age.2 Our exploratory analyses examined whether baseline characteristics2 subgrouped as dichotomous variables (with continuous characteristics classified around their average value) modified the effect of timing of regular egg introduction on the primary outcome of IgE-mediated egg allergy at 12 months of age. Log binomial regression models, including an interaction term for treatment group and subgroup status, were used to evaluate effect modification. Because STEP was designed to detect main effects, only large interaction effects could be identified in these exploratory analyses. For this reason, we focus primarily on raw interaction P values for evidence of effect modification, although for completeness we also present multiple comparison adjusted interaction P values. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute).

Approval for this study was granted by the local institutional review boards/human research ethics committees of Women’s and Children’s Health Network, Adelaide; Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide; and Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth. Written informed consent was obtained from parents prior to trial participation.

Results

Of 820 infants randomized, 748 (91%) completed an egg allergy assessment at 12 months. Socioeconomic status (SES)3 modified the effect of early regular egg introduction, with treatment reducing egg allergy rates in higher SES families (egg group: 6.7% vs control group: 14.6%; adjusted relative risk, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; interaction P = .02; Table) but not in lower SES families. This result did not appear to be driven by differential compliance; 77.4% of low SES families were classified as per-protocol vs 79.9% of high SES families (P = .38), and effect modification by SES was still apparent in per-protocol participants (adjusted interaction P = .01).

Table.  
Relative Risk of Egg Allergy by Treatment Group Modified by Maternal, Family, or Infant Characteristics
Relative Risk of Egg Allergy by Treatment Group Modified by Maternal, Family, or Infant Characteristics

Total household egg intake also modified the effect of early regular egg inclusion, with treatment decreasing the risk for egg allergy in families who ate fewer than 12 eggs per week at randomization (egg group: 3.9% vs control group: 10.8%; adjusted relative risk, 0.36; 95 CI, 0.16-0.82; interaction P = .04; Table) but not in families who ate 12 or more eggs per week. No interaction effects were found for any other baseline characteristics examined (Table).

Discussion

Our results suggest that infants from families of higher SES and those who consume few eggs per week could benefit from early regular egg intake. The possible benefit to infants living in households who consume fewer eggs is in keeping with the theory that small infrequent environmental doses may have a sensitizing effect, whereas regular exposure, especially via oral intake, leads to tolerance.4 As no difference was found in protocol compliance with SES, we have no direct explanation of the differential response in higher SES families. Interestingly, the incidence of egg allergy was highest in these families, which is consistent with earlier observations.5

Future research should continue to define subgroups who benefit from regular inclusion of allergenic foods in infant diets. This will enable targeted infant feeding practice guidelines and community education strategies.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Maria Makrides, PhD, Child Nutrition Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, 72 King William Rd, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia (maria.makrides@sahmri.com).

Published Online: March 27, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.4978

Author Contributions: Drs Makrides and Palmer had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Palmer, Sullivan, Prescott, Makrides.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Palmer, Sullivan, Makrides.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Palmer, Sullivan, Makrides.

Obtained funding: Prescott, Makrides.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Palmer, Prescott, Makrides.

Supervision: Palmer, Sullivan, Prescott, Makrides.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12610000388011

References
1.
Ierodiakonou  D, Garcia-Larsen  V, Logan  A,  et al.  Timing of allergenic food introduction to the infant diet and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2016;316(11):1181-1192.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Palmer  DJ, Sullivan  TR, Gold  MS, Prescott  SL, Makrides  M.  Randomized controlled trial of early regular egg intake to prevent egg allergy [published online August 20, 2016].  J Allergy Clin Immunol. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.052PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas. http://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/seifa. Accessed September 20, 2016.
4.
Lack  G.  Epidemiologic risks for food allergy.  J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(6):1331-1336.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Mullins  RJ, Clark  S, Camargo  CA  Jr.  Socio-economic status, geographic remoteness and childhood food allergy and anaphylaxis in Australia.  Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40(10):1523-1532.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×