[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1.  Differences in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Associated With Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure
Differences in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Associated With Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure

Seed-based functional connectivity contrasts detected differences in resting-state connectivity between children with (n = 25) and without (n = 23) prenatal acetaminophen exposure. Compared with the unexposed group, children with prenatal acetaminophen exposure demonstrated increased negative connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex gyrus (default mode network seed) and 6 clusters covering regions of bilateral precentral and postcentral gyri, superior parietal lobules, and supramarginal gyri (A), as well as increased negative connectivity between the left lateral prefrontal cortex (frontoparietal network seed) and a cluster spanning portions of the right precentral and frontal gyri (B). Analyses were thresholded at a voxel level of P < .001 (uncorrected) and at a cluster level of P < .05 (corrected for false discovery rate). Colored areas show increases in negative (blue) connectivity between the groups. Values above each image indicate the brain section being displayed.

Figure 2.  Causal Mediation by Frontoparietal Network–Frontal Cortex Connectivity
Causal Mediation by Frontoparietal Network–Frontal Cortex Connectivity

Individual values (points), median (horizontal lines), and interquartile range (boxes) depict significant differences in connectivity between the frontoparietal network and right precentral/frontal gyrus in children with vs without prenatal exposure to acetaminophen (A) and connectivity between the frontoparietal network and right precentral/frontal gyrus in children with hyperactivity above vs below the median (B). Mediation by connectivity of the association between acetaminophen detected in meconium and child hyperactivity at ages 9 to 11 years (C) shows the average causal mediation effect (CME) and average direct effect (DE) from causal mediation analysis. Connectivity is expressed as a Pearson correlation between the 2 brain regions with Fisher z transformation. BASC3-PRS indicates Behavioral Assessment System for Children Parent Report Scale.

Table 1.  Characteristics of Study Population Stratified by Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure in the GESTE Cohorta
Characteristics of Study Population Stratified by Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure in the GESTE Cohorta
Table 2.  Associations of Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure With Child ADHD
Associations of Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure With Child ADHD
Table 3.  Functional Connectivity Differences Between Groups With and Without Acetaminophen Detected in Meconium
Functional Connectivity Differences Between Groups With and Without Acetaminophen Detected in Meconium
1.
Werler  MM, Mitchell  AA, Hernandez-Diaz  S, Honein  MA.  Use of over-the-counter medications during pregnancy.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3, pt 1):771-777. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.100 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Rebordosa  C, Kogevinas  M, Bech  BH, Sørensen  HT, Olsen  J.  Use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.   Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):706-714. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp151 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Li  D-K, Liu  L, Odouli  R.  Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study.   BMJ. 2003;327(7411):368. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.368 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Nielsen  GL, Sørensen  HT, Larsen  H, Pedersen  L.  Risk of adverse birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based observational study and case-control study.   BMJ. 2001;322(7281):266-270. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7281.266 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Ofori  B, Oraichi  D, Blais  L, Rey  E, Bérard  A.  Risk of congenital anomalies in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a nested case-control study.   Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2006;77(4):268-279. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20085 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ericson  A, Källén  BA.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in early pregnancy.   Reprod Toxicol. 2001;15(4):371-375. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00137-X PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gyllenberg  D, Marttila  M, Sund  R,  et al.  Temporal changes in the incidence of treated psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders during adolescence: an analysis of two national Finnish birth cohorts.   Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):227-236. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30038-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Etminan  M, Sadatsafavi  M, Jafari  S, Doyle-Waters  M, Aminzadeh  K, FitzGerald  JM.  Acetaminophen use and the risk of asthma in children and adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis.   Chest. 2009;136(5):1316-1323. doi:10.1378/chest.09-0865 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Aminoshariae  A, Khan  A.  Acetaminophen: old drug, new issues.   J Endod. 2015;41(5):588-593. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.024 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Masarwa  R, Levine  H, Gorelik  E, Reif  S, Perlman  A, Matok  I.  Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of cohort studies.   Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(8):1817-1827. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy086 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Ghanem  CI, Pérez  MJ, Manautou  JE, Mottino  AD.  Acetaminophen from liver to brain: new insights into drug pharmacological action and toxicity.   Pharmacol Res. 2016;109:119-131. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.02.020 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Posadas  I, Santos  P, Blanco  A, Muñoz-Fernández  M, Ceña  V.  Acetaminophen induces apoptosis in rat cortical neurons.   PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015360 PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
da Silva  MH, da Rosa  EJF, de Carvalho  NR,  et al.  Acute brain damage induced by acetaminophen in mice: effect of diphenyl diselenide on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.   Neurotox Res. 2012;21(3):334-344. doi:10.1007/s12640-011-9288-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Albert  O, Desdoits-Lethimonier  C, Lesné  L,  et al.  Paracetamol, aspirin and indomethacin display endocrine disrupting properties in the adult human testis in vitro.   Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1890-1898. doi:10.1093/humrep/det112 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Jégou  B.  Paracetamol-induced endocrine disruption in human fetal testes.   Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(8):453-454. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.106 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Gou  X, Wang  Y, Tang  Y,  et al.  Association of maternal prenatal acetaminophen use with the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a meta-analysis.   Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019;53(3):195-206. doi:10.1177/0004867418823276 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
FDA has reviewed possible risks of pain medicine use during pregnancy. Published January 9, 2015. Accessed October 31, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-has-reviewed-possible-risks-pain-medicine-use-during-pregnancy
18.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org.  Prenatal acetaminophen use and outcomes in children.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):B14-B15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.021 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Ji  Y, Azuine  RE, Zhang  Y,  et al.  Association of cord plasma biomarkers of in utero acetaminophen exposure with risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in childhood.   JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;1-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Prescott  LF.  Kinetics and metabolism of paracetamol and phenacetin.   Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980;10(S2)(suppl 2):291S-298S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01812.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Hill  AB.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Sage Publications; 1965.
22.
Castellanos  FX, Aoki  Y.  Intrinsic functional connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a science in development.   Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1(3):253-261. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Gallo  EF, Posner  J.  Moving towards causality in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: overview of neural and genetic mechanisms.   Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(6):555-567. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00096-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Posner  J, Polanczyk  GV, Sonuga-Barke  E.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.   Lancet. 2020;395(10222):450-462. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33004-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Harries  JT.  Meconium in health and disease.   Br Med Bull. 1978;34(1):75-78. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071462 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Braun  JM, Daniels  JL, Poole  C,  et al.  A prospective cohort study of biomarkers of prenatal tobacco smoke exposure: the correlation between serum and meconium and their association with infant birth weight.   Environ Health. 2010;9(1):53. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-53 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Bearer  CF.  Meconium as a biological marker of prenatal exposure.   Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(1):40-43. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0040:MAABMO>2.0.CO;2 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Ostrea  EM  Jr, Brady  M, Gause  S, Raymundo  AL, Stevens  M.  Drug screening of newborns by meconium analysis: a large-scale, prospective, epidemiologic study.   Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):107-113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Cassoulet  R, Haroune  L, Abdelouahab  N,  et al.  Monitoring of prenatal exposure to organic and inorganic contaminants using meconium from an Eastern Canada cohort.   Environ Res. 2019;171:44-51. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.044 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Merenda  PF.  BASC: Behavior Assessment System for Children.   Measure Eval Counseling Dev. 1996;28(4):229-232.Google Scholar
31.
Whitfield-Gabrieli  S, Nieto-Castanon  A.  Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks.   Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-141. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Austin  PC.  An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies.   Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Rosenbaum  PR, Rubin  DB.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.   Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Austin  PC, Stuart  EA.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.   Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661-3679. doi:10.1002/sim.6607 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Imai  K, Ratkovic  M.  Covariate balancing propensity score.   J R Stat Soc Series B. 2014;76(1):243-263. doi:10.1111/rssb.12027 Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Fong  C, Ratkovic  M, Imai  K.  CBPS: R Package for Covariate Balancing Propensity Score. Comprehensive R Archive Network; 2014.
37.
MacKinnon  DP, Lockwood  CM, Hoffman  JM, West  SG, Sheets  V.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.   Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83-104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Tingley  D, Yamamoto  T, Hirose  K, Keele  L, Imai  K.  Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis.   J Stat Softw. 2014;59(5):1-38. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i05Google ScholarCrossref
39.
R Project for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Accessed January 7, 2019. https://www.R-project.org
40.
Fatoumata Binta Diallo  LR, Pelletier E, Lesage A, Vincent A, Vasiliadis H-M, Palardy S.  Surveillance of Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity (ADHD) in Quebec. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec; 2019.
41.
Austin  PC.  Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research.   Comm Stat. 2009;38(6):1228-1234. doi:10.1080/03610910902859574 Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Laue  HE, Cassoulet  R, Abdelouahab  N,  et al.  Association between meconium acetaminophen and childhood neurocognitive development in GESTE, a Canadian cohort study.   Toxicol Sci. 2019;167(1):138-144. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfy222 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Streissguth  AP, Treder  RP, Barr  HM,  et al.  Aspirin and acetaminophen use by pregnant women and subsequent child IQ and attention decrements.   Teratology. 1987;35(2):211-219. doi:10.1002/tera.1420350207 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Brandlistuen  RE, Ystrom  E, Nulman  I, Koren  G, Nordeng  H.  Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort study.   Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1702-1713. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt183 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Liew  Z, Ritz  B, Rebordosa  C, Lee  P-C, Olsen  J.  Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders.   JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):313-320. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4914 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Thompson  JM, Waldie  KE, Wall  CR, Murphy  R, Mitchell  EA; ABC Study Group.  Associations between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and ADHD symptoms measured at ages 7 and 11 years.   PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108210. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108210 PubMedGoogle Scholar
47.
Avella-Garcia  CB, Julvez  J, Fortuny  J,  et al.  Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and neurodevelopment: attention function and autism spectrum symptoms.   Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1987-1996. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw115 PubMedGoogle Scholar
48.
Liew  Z, Ritz  B, Virk  J, Olsen  J.  Maternal use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders in childhood: a Danish national birth cohort study.   Autism Res. 2016;9(9):951-958. doi:10.1002/aur.1591 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Stergiakouli  E, Thapar  A, Davey Smith  G.  Association of acetaminophen use during pregnancy with behavioral problems in childhood: evidence against confounding.   JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(10):964-970. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1775 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Serme-Gbedo  YK, Abdelouahab  N, Pasquier  J-C, Cohen  AA, Takser  L.  Maternal levels of endocrine disruptors, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, in early pregnancy are not associated with lower birth weight in the Canadian birth cohort GESTE.   Environ Health. 2016;15(1):49. doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0134-z PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Elton  A, Alcauter  S, Gao  W.  Network connectivity abnormality profile supports a categorical-dimensional hybrid model of ADHD.   Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(9):4531-4543. doi:10.1002/hbm.22492 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Vatansever  D, Bozhilova  NS, Asherson  P, Smallwood  J.  The devil is in the detail: exploring the intrinsic neural mechanisms that link attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomatology to ongoing cognition.   Psychol Med. 2019;49(7):1185-1194. doi:10.1017/S0033291718003598 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Pujol  J, Martínez-Vilavella  G, Macià  D,  et al.  Traffic pollution exposure is associated with altered brain connectivity in school children.   Neuroimage. 2016;129:175-184. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.036 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Tost  H, Champagne  FA, Meyer-Lindenberg  A.  Environmental influence in the brain, human welfare and mental health.   Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(10):1421-1431. doi:10.1038/nn.4108 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Lugo-Candelas  C, Cha  J, Hong  S,  et al.  Associations between brain structure and connectivity in infants and exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy.   JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(6):525-533. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5227 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3 Comments for this article
EXPAND ALL
Caution
Francesca Ferretti |
I read with interest this study. In my opinion, the complete absence of information about the indication for paracetamol/acetaminophen during pregnancy (chronic pain? infection? inappropriate use? complications of pregnancy?), the absence of a control group with other analgesics (such opioids), and the absence of any information about the pregnancies (complications during pregnancy or delivery, gestational age at delivery, maternal comorbidities -other than thyroid disorders- and other medications) make these results not interpretable and the conclusions not supported by the data.

I am conscious that acetaminophen is currently probably the safest medication for analgesia and antipyretic indication, being the
alternative to opioids and NSAIDs which have even more established side effects,. Therefore I think we need much stronger evidence to document harm of this medication, in my opinion.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Will Regulatory Authorities Finally Take Notice?
Richard Schmidt, BPharm PhD | [Retired pharmacist]
When I first qualified as a pharmacist, ADHD cases (or even the behaviours now identified as ADHD) were almost unknown. And children were still being given aspirin for pain & fever. Epidemiologists will be able to confirm that it was only after aspirin was replaced by acetaminophen / paracetamol that the number of cases of ADHD began to grow. I described this and more in an article published in 2013 (1). 

And whilst it is now recognised that the MMR vaccine is not itself the cause of the autistic spectrum disorders with which it has been
associated, has it not occurred to those who provide advice to the regulatory authorities in the US / Europe / and elsewhere that perhaps the cause of the autistic spectrum disorder was actually acetaminophen / paracetamol administered post vaccination in the false belief that pain or fever after vaccination needs to be treated symptomatically and/or that the acetaminophen / paracetamol would prevent febrile convulsions?

Anyone who believes "we need much stronger evidence to document harm of this medication" really does need to sit down and read what has already been reported in the medical literature over the last 20 years and more. And they should also talk to pharmacists who will confirm that acetaminophen / paracetamol products are probably the biggest selling lines in pharmacy. And on top of that there are the over-the counter sales in other outlets, and also medically prescribed acetaminophen / paracetamol-containing products. Pharmacists already know that many, perhaps most women, if asked whether they take / took acetaminophen / paracetamol during pregnancy, will not admit to doing / have done so. This study by Baker et al. demonstrates exactly this.

References

1. "Paracetamol: its dark side" https://bit.ly/2VK4iwn
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Cautious caution
Daniele C |
In reply to Dr.ssa Ferretti,
I'm of the same mind about n# 3 question (lack of information about pregnancies). Maybe I missed the point about n# 1 and n# 2 (lack of information about indication and lack of control group with other analgesics): why the former should be reported, in face to a linear-fashion dose-response relationship? how the latter could reduce the need for further investigations?

Let's consider Bradford Hill criteria: we are on the way of consistency (two different works by now), there is a biological gradient (dose-response relationship), there is somewath specificity (here doubt rises after you
properly assessed question n#3), temporality and strenght. Further investigations needed to have plausibility, analogy, coherence and maybe experimental evidences.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Original Investigation
September 28, 2020

Association of Prenatal Acetaminophen Exposure Measured in Meconium With Risk of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Mediated by Frontoparietal Network Brain Connectivity

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
  • 3New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York
  • 4Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
  • 5Departement de Pédiatrie, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • 6Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • 7Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • 8Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
  • 9Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
  • 10Departement de Psychiatrie, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(11):1073-1081. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3080
Key Points

Question  Is prenatal acetaminophen exposure measured in meconium associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and is the association mediated by changes in functional brain connectivity?

Findings  In this birth cohort study of 345 children, acetaminophen exposure detected in meconium was associated with increased odds of ADHD and altered brain connectivity between the frontoparietal and default mode networks to sensorimotor cortices. Altered frontoparietal-sensorimotor cortex connectivity mediated an association of prenatal acetaminophen exposure with hyperactivity.

Meaning  The findings that ADHD and related brain phenotypes are associated with prenatal acetaminophen exposure measured directly in meconium suggest that the safety of the drug’s use during pregnancy should be reevaluated.

Abstract

Importance  Despite evidence of an association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in offspring, the drug is not contraindicated during pregnancy, possibly because prior studies have relied on maternal self-report, failed to quantify acetaminophen dose, and lacked mechanistic insight.

Objective  To examine the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure measured in meconium (hereinafter referred to as meconium acetaminophen) and ADHD in children aged 6 to 7 years, along with the potential for mediation by functional brain connectivity.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective birth cohort study from the Centre Hospitalier Université de Sherbrooke in Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada, included 394 eligible children, of whom 345 had meconium samples collected at delivery and information on ADHD diagnosis. Mothers were enrolled from September 25, 2007, to September 10, 2009, at their first prenatal care visit or delivery and were followed up when children were aged 6 to 7 years. When children were aged 9 to 11 years, resting-state brain connectivity was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Data for the present study were collected from September 25, 2007, to January 18, 2020, and analyzed from January 7, 2019, to January 22, 2020.

Exposures  Acetaminophen levels measured in meconium.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Physician diagnosis of ADHD was determined at follow-up when children were aged 6 to 7 years or from medical records. Resting-state brain connectivity was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging; attention problems and hyperactivity were assessed with the Behavioral Assessment System for Children Parent Report Scale. Associations between meconium acetaminophen levels and outcomes were estimated with linear and logistic regressions weighted on the inverse probability of treatment to account for potential confounders. Causal mediation analysis was used to test for mediation of the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and hyperactivity by resting-state brain connectivity.

Results  Among the 345 children included in the analysis (177 boys [51.3%]; mean [SD] age, 6.58 [0.54] years), acetaminophen was detected in 199 meconium samples (57.7%), and ADHD was diagnosed in 33 children (9.6%). Compared with no acetaminophen, detection of acetaminophen in meconium was associated with increased odds of ADHD (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.41-4.21). A dose-response association was detected; each doubling of exposure increased the odds of ADHD by 10% (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19). Children with acetaminophen detected in meconium showed increased negative connectivity between frontoparietal and default mode network nodes to clusters in the sensorimotor cortices, which mediated an indirect effect on increased child hyperactivity (14%; 95% CI, 1%-26%).

Conclusions and Relevance  Together with the multitude of other cohort studies showing adverse neurodevelopment associated with prenatal acetaminophen exposure, this work suggests caution should be used in administering acetaminophen during pregnancy. Research into alternative pain management strategies for pregnant women could be beneficial.

Introduction

Acetaminophen is one of the most commonly used drugs during pregnancy, with use reported by more than half of pregnant women in some populations.1,2 It is the only recommended over-the-counter pain reliever during gestation, because other analgesics, such as ibuprofen and aspirin, may cause miscarriage or birth defects.3-7 Despite acetaminophen’s widespread use and reputation as a safe drug during pregnancy, concerns over the long-term effects of prenatal exposure on respiratory and neurodevelopmental outcomes have risen during the past several decades.8-10

One major concern is that acetaminophen may impair fetal brain development, both directly by inducing oxidative stress and apoptosis in the brain11-13 and indirectly via disruption of important developmental hormones, such as testosterone.14,15 Indeed, recent meta-analyses of observational studies support an association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and 3 neurodevelopmental outcomes: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder, and hyperkinetic disorder/hyperactivity symptoms.10,16 All 8 studies in these meta-analyses, however, used maternal self-report of acetaminophen exposure. Inaccurate maternal self-report may introduce information bias. Genetic and environmental factors may also affect acetaminophen metabolism, thereby altering the amount of the drug that reaches the fetus. Differential metabolism is not accounted for when acetaminophen is measured by maternal self-report.

Owing to limitations of prior studies, the US Food and Drug Administration17 and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine18 have not changed their recommendations to reflect the potential harm of prenatal acetaminophen to neurodevelopment. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine18 cited maternal self-report of acetaminophen use, lack of quantification of acetaminophen dose, and measurement of outcomes using questionnaires as 3 limitations of previous studies. A recent study in the Boston Birth Cohort19 addressed these limitations by finding a positive association between acetaminophen metabolites measured in cord plasma and physician diagnosis of ADHD.

Despite growing evidence of an association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and increased risk for ADHD, several limitations in prior studies remain. First, the Boston Birth Cohort study is the only one that used a direct measurement of acetaminophen levels.19 No single observational study is sufficient for causal inference, and more observational studies using direct measurements of fetal acetaminophen exposure are needed. Second, owing to the half-life of acetaminophen of less than 3 hours,20 a cord plasma measurement may only reflect acetaminophen use shortly before and immediately after birth.19 A direct measurement of fetal acetaminophen exposure that reflects longer-term exposure throughout pregnancy is warranted. Third, no prior studies have examined the potential mechanisms mediating the association of prenatal acetaminophen exposure with neurodevelopment, a key component for assessing the potential for causation.21 Neuroimaging research has repeatedly documented altered connectivity in important brain networks (eg, default mode, salience, frontoparietal) in individuals with ADHD,22-24 yet to date no studies have examined functional connectivity in association with prenatal acetaminophen exposure.

In an ongoing prospective birth cohort, we addressed the first 2 limitations by evaluating the association between ADHD and acetaminophen levels measured directly in meconium, the first feces of newborn infants. Chemicals in meconium are known to have passed through the fetus and into the fetal intestinal tract.25-27 In addition, meconium measurements reflect cumulative exposures during the last two-thirds of pregnancy, because drugs and drug metabolites are deposited in meconium during that period.28 We addressed the third limitation by conducting the first study using neuroimaging to assess the potential mediating role of functional connectivity in the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and child hyperactivity.

Methods
Study Population

This observational analysis was conducted in the Gestation and the Environment cohort in Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. Women 18 years or older with no known thyroid disease enrolled at the Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Université de Sherbrooke from September 25, 2007, to September 10, 2009, at their first prenatal care visit or delivery, and were followed up when children were aged 6 to 7 years. Families are currently completing a fourth follow-up assessment (starting February 3, 2018; children aged approximately 9-11 years). As a part of this fourth assessment, children are asked to undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. Parents were asked to not give their children ADHD medication on the day of the scan. On the day of the scan, parents were questioned to confirm adherence to this instruction. The eligible study sample consisted of 394 individuals for whom meconium measurements were collected at delivery. The final sample size was 345 children, because ADHD status was unknown for 49 individuals owing to loss to follow-up. At the time of this report, 76 children have undergone functional MRIs (February 3, 2018, to January 18, 2020), 48 of whom had meconium samples collected in infancy; only children with both meconium samples and MRIs were included in the MRI analyses. Parents signed informed consent forms at each follow-up, and children provided written consent at the follow-up at ages 9 to 11 years. All study protocols were approved by the institutional review boards of the University of Sherbrooke, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, and Columbia University, New York, New York. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

Exposure Assessment

Meconium was collected from the diapers of newborn infants after delivery and stored at −80 °C until analysis. Acetaminophen was extracted from less than 120 mg of meconium and analyzed with ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry following the methods described elsewhere.29 Acetaminophen was detected in 199 of the 345 samples (57.7%), with a recovery of 104% and repeatability of ±15%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 2 ng/g; the limit of quantification, 5 ng/g. In addition, clinical files from the hospital database and medical records were used to determine administration of acetaminophen during labor (yes or no).

Outcome Assessment

At a scheduled cohort follow-up when children were aged 6 to 7 years, parents were asked on a questionnaire if their child had physician-diagnosed ADHD. In total, 176 parents provided information at the 6- to 7-year follow-up. For those who did not complete the 6- to 7-year follow-up visit (n = 169), physician diagnosis of ADHD was obtained from reviewing medical records from Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke pediatric clinics, which are available in the hospital database. In addition, among the 48 children in the MRI analysis subsample, 46 completed the Behavioral Assessment System for Children Parent Report Scale (BASC3-PRS) at ages 9 to 11 years. In the BASC3-PRS, parents answer a range of questions concerning the behavior of their children that are combined into various rating scales, including scales for attention problems and hyperactivity.30

MRI Assessment

At ages 9 to 11 years, T1-weighted structural MRI and functional images were acquired on a 3-T whole-body scanner with a 32-channel head coil (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare). The Conn toolbox31 was used for preprocessing, and seed-based analyses were conducted. Forty-eight participants had both resting-state MRI data and meconium samples collected. The eMethods and eTable 1 in the Supplement provide details on MRI acquisition, preprocessing, and head motion, as well as demographic characteristics of the children undergoing scanning.

Covariates

Covariate data were obtained from questionnaires given during pregnancy and after delivery. Covariates were child sex, familial income (dichotomized at the sample median), and maternal characteristics, including age at delivery, educational status (college/university vs no college/university), prepregnancy body mass index, smoking during pregnancy (yes or no), and alcohol use during pregnancy (yes or no). A sensitivity analysis including ADHD in the mother (self-reported, obtained from questionnaire) as an additional covariate was conducted, but this variable was excluded from the final models because data were only available for 155 individuals. Controlling for maternal ADHD in this subset altered the estimate for acetaminophen level in meconium by just 2%, and the shift was away from the null. Missing covariate data were imputed with the median of continuous variables and the mode of categorical variables.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed from January 7, 2019, to January 22, 2020. To control for potential confounders, we used inverse probability weighting with propensity scores32-35 in the CBPS R package.36 Propensity scores (the likelihood of detectable meconium acetaminophen) were estimated using logistic regression models in which exposure (acetaminophen in meconium detected vs not detected) was regressed on child sex and maternal covariates described above. Weights were estimated as 1/p for exposed individuals and 1/(1 – p) for unexposed individuals, where p indicates the propensity score. Study sample weighting creates a pseudopopulation balanced on measured baseline covariates.32-34 Standardized mean differences were computed to assess balance of covariates between the exposed and unexposed groups in both weighted and unweighted samples (eTable 2 in the Supplement). In a sensitivity analysis, we excluded all mothers who were administered acetaminophen during delivery to account for potential confounding by indication for use during labor.

To explore a potential dose response association, we repeated models with continuous acetaminophen level in meconium and with acetaminophen categorized into 3 levels: not detected, low (≤69.0 ng/g [the 50th percentile of exposure]), and high (>69.0 ng/g). Continuous acetaminophen was log2n transformed, with 146 values below the LOD imputed with LOD/√2 and 13 values below the LOQ imputed with LOQ√2. We modeled continuous acetaminophen with both a linear regression and a generalized additive model, including a penalized spline term. A likelihood ratio test was used to compare these linear and nonlinear models.

Based on the outcome of interest (ie, ADHD in children), resting-state analyses focused on connectivity in 3 classical brain networks often implicated in ADHD: the default mode, salience/cingulo-opercular, and frontoparietal/central executive networks.22 Seed-based functional connectivity analyses were restricted to regions of interest constituting the aforementioned networks (from the Conn-provided atlas) and compared participants with (n = 25) and without (n = 23) prenatal acetaminophen exposure. Analyses controlled for confounders using propensity scores calculated specifically for the 48 participants with MRI data. Scores included the previously detailed variables, as well as child age at scan. Analyses were thresholded at a voxel level of P < .001 (uncorrected) and at a cluster level of P < .05 (corrected for false discovery rate [FDR]), and the eMethods in the Supplement provide details on regions of interest and data analyses. After connectivity analyses, we tested associations between connections that differed between the prenatal acetaminophen-exposed vs unexposed children and BASC3-PRS hyperactivity and attention problems scores at ages 9 to 11 years. We performed logistic regressions on BASC3-PRS scores categorized as above or below the median.

Finally, we performed causal mediation analyses examining connectivity between the frontoparietal network and right precentral/frontal gyrus, because connectivity between these regions was (1) significantly different between exposed and unexposed children and (2) significantly associated with hyperactivity. The purpose of our mediation analyses was not to investigate the total effect of acetaminophen on hyperactivity but rather to investigate processes potentially underlying ADHD. Thus, we did not consider a significant total effect on hyperactivity as a requirement to test for indirect effects. Dropping this requirement reduces type II error associated with the Barron and Kenny causal steps approach.37 We used the mediation R package,38 implementing a quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo method with 1000 simulations, to test whether connectivity mediated the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and hyperactivity. This method computes the average direct effect and average causal mediation effect, reflecting direct and indirect (ie, mediated by connectivity) effects of prenatal acetaminophen exposure on hyperactivity. The mediation R package uses information from 2 models with (1) connectivity as outcome and prenatal acetaminophen level as a covariate, and (2) hyperactivity as outcome and both connectivity and prenatal acetaminophen level as covariates. To assess the potential effect of unobserved pretreatment confounders, we introduced a sensitivity parameter ρ as the correlation between the residuals of the mediator and outcome regressions. We allowed ρ to vary from −0.9 to 0.9 by 0.05-increments to determine what level of confounder-induced correlation would bias results to the null. Two-sided P < .05 indicated significance. Statistical analyses were conducted with R, version 3.5.1.39

Results

Among the total study sample of 345 children (168 girls [48.7%] and 177 boys [51.3%]; mean [SD] age, 6.58 [0.54] years at 6- to 7-year follow-up), acetaminophen was detected in the meconium of 199 individuals (57.7%), and ADHD was diagnosed in 33 individuals. This 9.6% ADHD prevalence was comparable to the lifetime 11.3% prevalence in Québec.40 Baseline covariates stratified by acetaminophen detection are presented in Table 1. Standardized mean differences were less than 0.1 for all covariates after inverse probability weighting, indicating balance between the exposed and unexposed groups (eTable 2 in the Supplement).41

Acetaminophen detection in meconium (hereinafter referred to as meconium acetaminophen) was associated with nearly 2.5-fold increased odds of ADHD at ages 6 to 7 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.41-4.21) (Table 2) in the weighted sample balanced on covariates. When acetaminophen exposure was categorized into 3 levels, low acetaminophen exposure level did not significantly modify the risk of ADHD compared with no acetaminophen exposure (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.79-2.63). However, high levels of acetaminophen detected in meconium increased the odds of ADHD more than 4-fold (OR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.41-6.95) (Table 2). When meconium acetaminophen was linearly modeled, each doubling of exposure increased the odds of ADHD by 10% (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19) (Table 2). Introducing a nonlinear penalized spline for continuous acetaminophen did not improve the model fit (log likelihood, −109.29 vs −110.64; likelihood ratio test, P = .10) (eFigure in the Supplement). Results did not differ in a sensitivity analysis excluding 44 mothers who were administered acetaminophen at delivery (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.35-4.21).

Functional connectivity analyses revealed that, compared with the unexposed group, children with detectable levels of acetaminophen in meconium demonstrated increased negative connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex gyrus (default mode network seed) and 6 clusters covering regions of bilateral precentral and postcentral gyri, superior parietal lobules, and supramarginal gyri (t > 5.30; FDR-corrected P < .03). Exposed children also demonstrated increased negative connectivity between the left lateral prefrontal cortex (frontoparietal network seed) and a cluster spanning portions of the right precentral and frontal gyrus (t = 4.62; FDR-corrected P = .02) (Table 3 and Figure 1). There were no differences detected using salience network seeds.

Among these brain connections associated with meconium acetaminophen, connectivity between the frontoparietal network and right precentral/frontal gyrus was also associated with BASC3-PRS hyperactivity score (eTable 3 in the Supplement). Consistent with the potential for mediation, meconium acetaminophen was associated with decreased connectivity (β = −0.18 [95% CI, −0.26 to −0.10]) (Figure 2A), and children with decreased connectivity were more hyperactive (OR for a 1-point increase in Fisher z-transformed Pearson correlation between brain regions, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.00-0.68]; P = .03) (Figure 2B). Causal mediation analysis revealed no total (15% increase; 95% CI, −6% to 36%) or direct (1% increase; 95% CI, −200% to 26%) effect of meconium acetaminophen levels on hyperactivity, but a significant indirect effect on increased hyperactivity mediated through frontoparietal network and right precentral/frontal gyrus connectivity (14% increase; 95% CI, 1%-26%) (Figure 2C and eTable 4 in the Supplement). A sensitivity analysis for pretreatment confounders revealed that to bias this result to the null, an unobserved confounder would need to induce a correlation between the residuals of the mediator and outcome regressions of ρ = −0.3.

Discussion

In this prospective Eastern Canadian cohort, children exposed to acetaminophen prenatally were at increased risk of ADHD at ages 6 to 7 years. Categorical and continuous models suggested that higher levels of meconium acetaminophen increased the risk of ADHD in children in a linear manner. Prenatal acetaminophen exposure was also associated with increased negative connectivity between the left prefrontal cortex (frontoparietal seed) and the right precentral/frontal gyrus, which mediated the association of acetaminophen with hyperactivity. Several prior studies10,16 have implicated prenatal acetaminophen exposure in the etiology of neurodevelopmental diseases such as ADHD and autism spectrum disorder, yet none have examined brain function after acetaminophen exposure. Further, to the best of our knowledge, our results are just the second report of an association between ADHD in children and prenatal acetaminophen levels measured not via questionnaire, but in a biological sample,19 and the first study of the association between acetaminophen levels measured in meconium and ADHD. A prior study in this cohort42 examined the association between meconium acetaminophen levels and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and found no consistent associations.

Strengths and Limitations

A strength of this study was the unbiased, biological measure of fetal acetaminophen exposure. All but 1 of the prior studies of the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and child ADHD43-49 have relied on questionnaires requiring mothers to recall drug use at intervals greater than 3 months. Difficulty recalling drug use during pregnancy may result in nondifferential misclassification bias toward the null. This source of bias may explain the smaller pooled risk ratio of 1.34 for ADHD from past cohort studies10 compared with the nearly 2.5-fold increased odds reported herein. Supporting this hypothesis, the only other study not relying on maternal self-report,19 which measured acetaminophen levels in cord plasma, reported an OR of 2.26 for the second tertile and 2.86 for the third tertile compared with the first tertile of exposure. However, it is possible that results in this population, which is highly educated and genetically homogeneous,50 are not generalizable to other populations with different characteristics.

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to examine associations of prenatal acetaminophen exposure with functional connectivity in childhood. Alterations in connectivity between the default mode and frontoparietal networks to the sensorimotor cortices have been previously documented in both children51 and adults52 with ADHD and have been linked to symptom severity. Herein we offer a putative mechanistic insight into the association between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and ADHD in offspring. Causal mediation analysis revealed that altered frontoparietal network connectivity may link prenatal acetaminophen exposure with increased child hyperactivity at ages 9 to 11 years. Although this result suggests that brain connectivity may also mediate an indirect effect on ADHD, we were unable to explore this possibility, because ADHD diagnosis information was obtained when children were aged 6 to 7 years. Studies have previously associated altered functional brain connectivity with environmental exposures, including air pollution,53 social stress,54 and prenatal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,55 although this is the first neuroimaging study of prenatal acetaminophen exposure, to our knowledge. Taken with the wide confidence interval of the mediation analysis indirect effect and the small MRI sample size, studies in larger and more diverse cohorts are needed to replicate these novel findings.

Confounding by unmeasured or unknown factors is always a possibility. Although we did not control for indications for acetaminophen use in this study, prior cohort studies controlling for maternal fevers, infections, and other indications for acetaminophen use19,44-47,49 have reported lack of confounding by these factors. However, lack of confounding by indicators in prior cohort studies does not necessarily apply to the cohort studied herein. We also considered the possibility that meconium acetaminophen concentrations were a reflection of acetaminophen administered during labor rather than throughout pregnancy. However, excluding women who were administered acetaminophen at delivery did not change our results. Although meconium is known to accumulate drugs and drug metabolites throughout the last two-thirds of pregnancy, we did not explicitly correlate maternal acetaminophen use with acetaminophen concentrations in meconium, a potential limitation that should be the subject of future work. Another possibility is confounding by unknown genetic, social, and familial factors associated with acetaminophen use. This concern has been recently addressed with negative control exposure analysis: maternal acetaminophen use before and after pregnancy and a partner’s acetaminophen use were not associated with child ADHD in populations in which maternal acetaminophen use during pregnancy increased the risk.28,29 Furthermore, our study population has high genetic and sociodemographic homogeneity.50 Hence, confounding by unknown or unmeasured factors is unlikely. Finally, although children did not take ADHD medications on the day of the scan, we could not rule out prior medication use.

Conclusions

By using a direct measurement of prenatal acetaminophen exposure that is unbiased by maternal recall, these results add evidence in support of the association between prenatal acetaminophen use and child ADHD. Taken together with the large ORs reported in the Boston Birth Cohort study,19 these results suggest that prior studies may have been biased toward the null by inaccurate maternal recall. Thus, the association between prenatal acetaminophen and ADHD may be even stronger than previously estimated. This study additionally supports altered resting-state brain connectivity as a potential underlying mechanism linking prenatal acetaminophen use with child hyperactivity. Along with the multitude of other cohort studies drawing similar conclusions, this work joins the Boston Birth Cohort study as the second study addressing the concerns of the US Food and Drug Administration and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine about maternal self-report and lack of quantification of prenatal acetaminophen dose. These institutions should therefore consider reevaluating the evidence regarding the safety of fetal acetaminophen exposure.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: June 6, 2020.

Corresponding Author: Brennan H. Baker, MA, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (bhb2128@cumc.columbia.edu).

Published Online: September 28, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3080

Author Contributions: Mr Baker had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Baker, Wu, Posner, Takser, Baccarelli.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Baker, Lugo-Candelas, Wu, Laue, Boivin, Gillet, Aw, Rahman, Lepage, Whittingstall, Bellenger, Posner, Baccarelli.

Drafting of the manuscript: Baker, Lugo-Candelas, Posner.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Baker, Wu, Laue, Boivin, Gillet, Aw, Rahman, Lepage, Whittingstall, Bellenger, Posner, Takser, Baccarelli.

Statistical analysis: Baker, Lugo-Candelas, Wu, Rahman, Whittingstall.

Obtained funding: Lepage, Bellenger, Posner, Takser, Baccarelli.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Boivin, Gillet, Aw, Rahman, Posner.

Supervision: Bellenger, Posner, Baccarelli.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Mr Baker reported receiving grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences during the conduct of the study. Dr Lugo-Candelas reported receiving personal fees from Allergan plc outside the submitted work. Dr Bellenger reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study and grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada outside the submitted work. Dr Posner reported receiving grants from Aevi Genomic Medicine, Inc, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited outside the submitted work and consultancy fees from Innovative Science Corporation. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants R21ES024841, R01ES027845, and P30ES009089 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; grant MOP-84551 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; and Canadian Research Chair grant CRC-950-230570 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: David Mathieu, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada, revised magnetic resonance images with cerebral abnormalities, for which he was not compensated.

References
1.
Werler  MM, Mitchell  AA, Hernandez-Diaz  S, Honein  MA.  Use of over-the-counter medications during pregnancy.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3, pt 1):771-777. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.100 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Rebordosa  C, Kogevinas  M, Bech  BH, Sørensen  HT, Olsen  J.  Use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.   Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(3):706-714. doi:10.1093/ije/dyp151 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Li  D-K, Liu  L, Odouli  R.  Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study.   BMJ. 2003;327(7411):368. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7411.368 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Nielsen  GL, Sørensen  HT, Larsen  H, Pedersen  L.  Risk of adverse birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based observational study and case-control study.   BMJ. 2001;322(7281):266-270. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7281.266 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Ofori  B, Oraichi  D, Blais  L, Rey  E, Bérard  A.  Risk of congenital anomalies in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a nested case-control study.   Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2006;77(4):268-279. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20085 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Ericson  A, Källén  BA.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in early pregnancy.   Reprod Toxicol. 2001;15(4):371-375. doi:10.1016/S0890-6238(01)00137-X PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gyllenberg  D, Marttila  M, Sund  R,  et al.  Temporal changes in the incidence of treated psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders during adolescence: an analysis of two national Finnish birth cohorts.   Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):227-236. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30038-5 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Etminan  M, Sadatsafavi  M, Jafari  S, Doyle-Waters  M, Aminzadeh  K, FitzGerald  JM.  Acetaminophen use and the risk of asthma in children and adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis.   Chest. 2009;136(5):1316-1323. doi:10.1378/chest.09-0865 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Aminoshariae  A, Khan  A.  Acetaminophen: old drug, new issues.   J Endod. 2015;41(5):588-593. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2015.01.024 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Masarwa  R, Levine  H, Gorelik  E, Reif  S, Perlman  A, Matok  I.  Prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and risk for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of cohort studies.   Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(8):1817-1827. doi:10.1093/aje/kwy086 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Ghanem  CI, Pérez  MJ, Manautou  JE, Mottino  AD.  Acetaminophen from liver to brain: new insights into drug pharmacological action and toxicity.   Pharmacol Res. 2016;109:119-131. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2016.02.020 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Posadas  I, Santos  P, Blanco  A, Muñoz-Fernández  M, Ceña  V.  Acetaminophen induces apoptosis in rat cortical neurons.   PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15360. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015360 PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
da Silva  MH, da Rosa  EJF, de Carvalho  NR,  et al.  Acute brain damage induced by acetaminophen in mice: effect of diphenyl diselenide on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction.   Neurotox Res. 2012;21(3):334-344. doi:10.1007/s12640-011-9288-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Albert  O, Desdoits-Lethimonier  C, Lesné  L,  et al.  Paracetamol, aspirin and indomethacin display endocrine disrupting properties in the adult human testis in vitro.   Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1890-1898. doi:10.1093/humrep/det112 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Jégou  B.  Paracetamol-induced endocrine disruption in human fetal testes.   Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(8):453-454. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.106 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Gou  X, Wang  Y, Tang  Y,  et al.  Association of maternal prenatal acetaminophen use with the risk of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in offspring: a meta-analysis.   Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019;53(3):195-206. doi:10.1177/0004867418823276 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
FDA has reviewed possible risks of pain medicine use during pregnancy. Published January 9, 2015. Accessed October 31, 2019. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-fda-has-reviewed-possible-risks-pain-medicine-use-during-pregnancy
18.
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org.  Prenatal acetaminophen use and outcomes in children.   Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(3):B14-B15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.021 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Ji  Y, Azuine  RE, Zhang  Y,  et al.  Association of cord plasma biomarkers of in utero acetaminophen exposure with risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in childhood.   JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;1-11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Prescott  LF.  Kinetics and metabolism of paracetamol and phenacetin.   Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980;10(S2)(suppl 2):291S-298S. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01812.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Hill  AB.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Sage Publications; 1965.
22.
Castellanos  FX, Aoki  Y.  Intrinsic functional connectivity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a science in development.   Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1(3):253-261. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.03.004 PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Gallo  EF, Posner  J.  Moving towards causality in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: overview of neural and genetic mechanisms.   Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(6):555-567. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00096-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Posner  J, Polanczyk  GV, Sonuga-Barke  E.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.   Lancet. 2020;395(10222):450-462. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33004-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Harries  JT.  Meconium in health and disease.   Br Med Bull. 1978;34(1):75-78. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071462 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Braun  JM, Daniels  JL, Poole  C,  et al.  A prospective cohort study of biomarkers of prenatal tobacco smoke exposure: the correlation between serum and meconium and their association with infant birth weight.   Environ Health. 2010;9(1):53. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-9-53 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Bearer  CF.  Meconium as a biological marker of prenatal exposure.   Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(1):40-43. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0040:MAABMO>2.0.CO;2 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Ostrea  EM  Jr, Brady  M, Gause  S, Raymundo  AL, Stevens  M.  Drug screening of newborns by meconium analysis: a large-scale, prospective, epidemiologic study.   Pediatrics. 1992;89(1):107-113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Cassoulet  R, Haroune  L, Abdelouahab  N,  et al.  Monitoring of prenatal exposure to organic and inorganic contaminants using meconium from an Eastern Canada cohort.   Environ Res. 2019;171:44-51. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.044 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Merenda  PF.  BASC: Behavior Assessment System for Children.   Measure Eval Counseling Dev. 1996;28(4):229-232.Google Scholar
31.
Whitfield-Gabrieli  S, Nieto-Castanon  A.  Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks.   Brain Connect. 2012;2(3):125-141. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Austin  PC.  An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies.   Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399-424. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Rosenbaum  PR, Rubin  DB.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.   Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Austin  PC, Stuart  EA.  Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.   Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661-3679. doi:10.1002/sim.6607 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Imai  K, Ratkovic  M.  Covariate balancing propensity score.   J R Stat Soc Series B. 2014;76(1):243-263. doi:10.1111/rssb.12027 Google ScholarCrossref
36.
Fong  C, Ratkovic  M, Imai  K.  CBPS: R Package for Covariate Balancing Propensity Score. Comprehensive R Archive Network; 2014.
37.
MacKinnon  DP, Lockwood  CM, Hoffman  JM, West  SG, Sheets  V.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.   Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83-104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Tingley  D, Yamamoto  T, Hirose  K, Keele  L, Imai  K.  Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis.   J Stat Softw. 2014;59(5):1-38. doi:10.18637/jss.v059.i05Google ScholarCrossref
39.
R Project for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018. Accessed January 7, 2019. https://www.R-project.org
40.
Fatoumata Binta Diallo  LR, Pelletier E, Lesage A, Vincent A, Vasiliadis H-M, Palardy S.  Surveillance of Attention Deficit Disorder With or Without Hyperactivity (ADHD) in Quebec. National Institute of Public Health of Quebec; 2019.
41.
Austin  PC.  Using the standardized difference to compare the prevalence of a binary variable between two groups in observational research.   Comm Stat. 2009;38(6):1228-1234. doi:10.1080/03610910902859574 Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Laue  HE, Cassoulet  R, Abdelouahab  N,  et al.  Association between meconium acetaminophen and childhood neurocognitive development in GESTE, a Canadian cohort study.   Toxicol Sci. 2019;167(1):138-144. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfy222 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Streissguth  AP, Treder  RP, Barr  HM,  et al.  Aspirin and acetaminophen use by pregnant women and subsequent child IQ and attention decrements.   Teratology. 1987;35(2):211-219. doi:10.1002/tera.1420350207 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Brandlistuen  RE, Ystrom  E, Nulman  I, Koren  G, Nordeng  H.  Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort study.   Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42(6):1702-1713. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt183 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Liew  Z, Ritz  B, Rebordosa  C, Lee  P-C, Olsen  J.  Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders.   JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):313-320. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4914 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Thompson  JM, Waldie  KE, Wall  CR, Murphy  R, Mitchell  EA; ABC Study Group.  Associations between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and ADHD symptoms measured at ages 7 and 11 years.   PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108210. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108210 PubMedGoogle Scholar
47.
Avella-Garcia  CB, Julvez  J, Fortuny  J,  et al.  Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and neurodevelopment: attention function and autism spectrum symptoms.   Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(6):1987-1996. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw115 PubMedGoogle Scholar
48.
Liew  Z, Ritz  B, Virk  J, Olsen  J.  Maternal use of acetaminophen during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders in childhood: a Danish national birth cohort study.   Autism Res. 2016;9(9):951-958. doi:10.1002/aur.1591 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Stergiakouli  E, Thapar  A, Davey Smith  G.  Association of acetaminophen use during pregnancy with behavioral problems in childhood: evidence against confounding.   JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(10):964-970. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1775 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Serme-Gbedo  YK, Abdelouahab  N, Pasquier  J-C, Cohen  AA, Takser  L.  Maternal levels of endocrine disruptors, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, in early pregnancy are not associated with lower birth weight in the Canadian birth cohort GESTE.   Environ Health. 2016;15(1):49. doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0134-z PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Elton  A, Alcauter  S, Gao  W.  Network connectivity abnormality profile supports a categorical-dimensional hybrid model of ADHD.   Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(9):4531-4543. doi:10.1002/hbm.22492 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Vatansever  D, Bozhilova  NS, Asherson  P, Smallwood  J.  The devil is in the detail: exploring the intrinsic neural mechanisms that link attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptomatology to ongoing cognition.   Psychol Med. 2019;49(7):1185-1194. doi:10.1017/S0033291718003598 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Pujol  J, Martínez-Vilavella  G, Macià  D,  et al.  Traffic pollution exposure is associated with altered brain connectivity in school children.   Neuroimage. 2016;129:175-184. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.036 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Tost  H, Champagne  FA, Meyer-Lindenberg  A.  Environmental influence in the brain, human welfare and mental health.   Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(10):1421-1431. doi:10.1038/nn.4108 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Lugo-Candelas  C, Cha  J, Hong  S,  et al.  Associations between brain structure and connectivity in infants and exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy.   JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(6):525-533. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5227 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×