[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Special Feature
March 1999

Radiological Case of the Month

Author Affiliations

Copyright 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.1999

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(3):304. doi:
Denouement and Discussion: Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome

Figure 1. Upper gastrointestinal tract contrast-medium study showing duodenal dilatation of the first and second parts of the duodenum (arrow) establishes a diagnosis of superior mesenteric artery syndrome.

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is an unusual but well-recognized clinical entity characterized by compression of the third, or transverse, portion of the duodenum against the aorta by the SMA or leaf of the mesentery, and results in chronic, intermittent, or acute duodenal obstruction.1-4 Superior mesenteric artery syndrome was first described in 1861 by Von Rokitansky,5 who proposed that its cause was obstruction of the third part of the duodenum, by arteriomesenteric compression. Despite 400 cases reported in the English literature,1,2,6,7 the existence of SMA syndrome has been doubted; indeed, some investigators have suggested that the SMA syndrome is overdiagnosed because it is confused with other causes of megaduodenum.2,8

The SMA normally forms an angle of approximately 45° (range, 38°–56°) with the abdominal aorta, while the third portion of the duodenum crosses caudally to the origin of the SMA, running between the SMA and the aorta.1,2 Any factor that narrows the aortomesenteric angle (between 6° and 16°) can produce entrapment of the third portion of the duodenum as it passes between the vessels.9 Important causative factors precipitating narrowing of the aortomesenteric angle are thin body build, exaggerated lumbar lordosis, visceroptosis, abdominal wall laxity, and depletion of the mesenteric fat by rapid severe weight loss, and due to catabolic states (eg, cancer and burns), severe injuries (eg, head trauma leading to prolonged bed rest), and dietary disorders (including anorexia nervosa or malabsorption). Also, spinal disease, deformity, or trauma, and use of a body cast in the treatment of scoliosis or vertebral fractures, rapid linear growth without compensatory weight gain, particularly during adolescence, and anatomical anomalies such as an abnormally high and fixed position of the ligament of Treitz, or an unusually low origin of the SMA are postulated causes of the SMA syndrome.1,2,9

This syndrome usually occurs in older children and adolescents and has a female preponderance.6,10 Symptoms can be acute11,12 or chronic, with intermittent exacerbations.3,9,10,13 The patient often presents with chronic upper abdominal symptoms such as epigastric pain, bilious vomiting, postprandial discomfort, or subacute small-bowel obstruction. The symptoms are often relieved when the patient is in the left lateral decubitus, prone, or knee-chest position1,2 and aggravated in the supine position. Delay in the diagnosis of SMA syndrome can result in malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and death.14

Confirmation of the diagnosis usually requires radiographic demonstration such as an upper gastrointestinal tract series, hypotonic duodenography, or computed tomography. Upper gastrointestinal tract study reveals dilatation of the first and second part of the duodenum with an abrupt vertical or linear cutoff at the third part. Mucosal folds are normal.2 Fluoroscopy demonstrates to-and-fro peristalsis of the barium in the dilated portions of the duodenum. Hypotonic duodenography may depict the site of obstruction and a dilated proximal duodenum with antiperistaltic waves within the dilated portion.1 Computed tomography is useful in the diagnosis of SMA syndrome and can provide diagnostic information including aorta-SMA distance, duodenal distention, and amount of intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal fat.7,15,16

The differential diagnosis of the SMA includes anorexia nervosa and bulemia. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome should be differentiated from other causes of megaduodenum, such as diabetes mellitus, collagen vascular conditions, or chronic idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction.17,18

Reversing or removing the precipitating factor is usually successful in patients with acute SMA syndrome. Conservative treatment is recommended initially for all symptomatic patients.1,2 Enteral feeding can be an effective adjunct in the treatment of patients with rapid severe weight loss.2 Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative measures fail, particularly for patients with a history of chronic symptoms and pronounced duodenal dilation.1 Duodenojejunostomy is the most frequently used procedure and is successful in 90% of cases.13

Accepted for publication December 10, 1997.

Reprints: Avinash K. Shetty, MD, Louisiana State University Medical Center, 1542 Tulane Ave, T8-1, New Orleans, LA 70118.

Wilson-Storey  DMacKinlay  GA The superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1986;31175- 178Google Scholar
Hines  JRGore  RMBallantyne  GH Superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  Am J Surg. 1984;148630- 632Google ScholarCrossref
Anderson  JREarshaw  PMFraser  GM Extrinsic compression of the third part of the duodenum.  Clin Radiol. 1982;3375- 81Google ScholarCrossref
Gondos  B Duodenal compression and the "superior mesenteric artery syndrome."  Radiology. 1977;123572- 580Google Scholar
Von Rokitansky  C Lehrbuch der Pathologischen Anatomie.  Vienna, Austria Braumuller & Seidel1861;187
Ylinen  PKinnunen  JHockerstedt  K Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: a follow-up study of 16 operated patients.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989;11386- 391Google ScholarCrossref
Applegate  GRCohen  AJ Dynamic CT in superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12976- 980Google ScholarCrossref
Cimmino  CV Superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  N Y State J Med. 1976;76986- 988Google Scholar
Mansberger  ARHearn  JBByers  RM Vascular compression of the duodenum: emphasis on the accurate diagnosis.  Am J Surg. 1968;11589- 96Google ScholarCrossref
Akin  JTGray  SWSkandalakis  JE Vascular compression of the duodenum: presentation of ten cases and review of the literature.  Surgery. 1976;79515- 522Google Scholar
Mindell  JHJolm  JL Acute superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  Radiology. 1966;94299- 302Google Scholar
Pentlow  BDDent  RG Acute vascular compression of the duodenum in anorexia nervosa.  Br J Surg. 1981;68665- 666Google ScholarCrossref
Cohen  LBField  SPSachar  DB The superior mesenteric artery syndrome: the disease that isn't or is it?  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1985;7113- 116Google ScholarCrossref
Hutchinson  DTBassett  GS Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in pediatric orthopedic patients.  Clin Orthop. 1990;250250- 257Google Scholar
Santer  RYoung  CRossi  TRiddlesberger,  MM Computer tomography in superior mesenteric artery syndrome.  Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21154- 155Google ScholarCrossref
Barnes  JBLee  M Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in an intravenous drug abuser after rapid weight loss.  South Med J. 1997;89331- 334Google ScholarCrossref
Anderson  FH Megaduodenum.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1974;62509- 515Google Scholar
Schuffler  MDPope  CE Studies of idiopathic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, II: hereditary visceral myopathy: family studies.  Gastroenterology. 1977;73339- 344Google Scholar