[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Article
September 1999

Meyer Dysplasia in the Differential Diagnosis of Hip Disease in Young Children

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics (Drs Harel, Ashkenazi, Rachmel, and Amir) and Imaging Department (Drs Kornreich and Karmazyn), Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tiqva, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(9):942-945. doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.9.942
Abstract

Objectives  To describe a rare developmental disorder of the femoral capital epiphysis in infants and children that is often misdiagnosed and to suggest an evaluation protocol to differentiate it from other hip problems.

Design  Case series.

Setting  Tertiary care center.

Subjects  Five consecutive patients referred for evaluation of acute onset of limping between January 1990 and December 1997.

Intervention  All clinical and imaging data were collected.

Results  Two of the 5 patients were initially diagnosed as having osteomyelitis and 3 as having Perthes disease. The diagnosis of Meyer dysplasia was confirmed by plain film of the pelvis, a negative bone scan, or normal bone marrow findings on magnetic resonance imaging. The limping resolved without treatment in all patients within 1 to 3 weeks.

Conclusions  Meyer dysplasia is a benign condition that should be included in the differential diagnosis of hip disease in infants and children. Awareness of this condition may prevent unnecessary hospitalization and treatment.

MEYER dysplasia is a symptomless developmental disorder of the hip manifested by delayed, irregular ossification of the femoral epiphysial nucleus.1 The dysplasia is noted during the second year of life and usually disappears by the end of the sixth year without treatment.2 This rare condition may easily be mistaken for other hip problems, leading to unnecessary diagnostic procedures and treatments.

We describe 5 children who were ultimately diagnosed as having Meyer dysplasia and suggest guidelines for the evaluation of this condition based on our findings and a review of the literature.

Patients and methods

Five consecutive patients referred to our tertiary care center between January 1990 and December 1997 for acute onset of limping were evaluated clinically and by imaging studies.

Results

Table 1 presents clinical findings and Table 2 presents imaging findings in the 5 patients. The 5 children included 4 males and 1 female aged 9 to 48 months. All presented with acute onset of limping of 2 to 30 days' duration. Patient 3 was being observed by a pediatric endocrinologist for short stature, and patient 4 had a family history of congenital dislocation of the hip and Perthes disease. Otherwise, the histories were unremarkable.

Table 1. 
Clinical Findings in Meyer Dysplasia
Clinical Findings in Meyer Dysplasia
Table 2. 
Imaging Findings of the Hip Joints in Meyer Dysplasia
Imaging Findings of the Hip Joints in Meyer Dysplasia

Physical examination revealed a decreased range of motion of the hip joint in 3 of the 5 patients; in 1 (patient 2), it was accompanied by fever. Acute-phase reactants (high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high white blood cell count) were found in 2 patients (patients 1 and 2). Hip radiographs revealed various epiphysial changes compatible with Meyer dysplasia in all patients, 3 of whom had bilateral involvement (Figure 1).

Figure 1. 
Anteroposterior view of hip joint, demonstrating the various appearances of Meyer dysplasia. A, Patient 1, demonstrating radiolucent defect in the femoral head. B, Patient 2, showing flattening, sclerosis, and a radiolucent focus in the femoral head. C, Patient 4, demonstrating fragmentation of the femoral head.

Anteroposterior view of hip joint, demonstrating the various appearances of Meyer dysplasia. A, Patient 1, demonstrating radiolucent defect in the femoral head. B, Patient 2, showing flattening, sclerosis, and a radiolucent focus in the femoral head. C, Patient 4, demonstrating fragmentation of the femoral head.

The initial diagnosis in patients 1 and 2 was acute osteomyelitis, based on the clinical presentation and the presence of an elevated sedimentation rate with leukocytosis and radiolucent lesions of the femoral head. However, the normal findings on bone scan ruled out this possibility and supported the diagnosis of Meyer dysplasia.

The 3 other patients (patients 3, 4, and 5) were first suspected to have Perthes disease, based on the clinical presentation, lack of signs of infection, and the presence of epiphysial changes on the hip radiographs. Again, normal bone scan findings excluded this diagnosis. Because of a family history of Perthes disease in patient 4, magnetic resonance imaging was performed, revealing multiple centers of ossification of the femoral heads. The normal bone marrow intensity in all sequences ruled out edema and ischemia and confirmed the diagnosis of Meyer dysplasia (Figure 2).

Figure 2. 
Patient 4. Magnetic resonance imaging scan, T2-weighted coronal cut of the hip joints, demonstrating multiple centers of ossification of the femoral heads. The bone marrow shows normal signal intensity.

Patient 4. Magnetic resonance imaging scan, T2-weighted coronal cut of the hip joints, demonstrating multiple centers of ossification of the femoral heads. The bone marrow shows normal signal intensity.

In all patients, the limping resolved without treatment within 1 to 3 weeks. Bone survey did not disclose epiphysial dysplasias in other bones in any of the children. Results of thyroid function tests were normal. Bone age (by Greulich Pyle) was retarded in all patients.

Comment

Pedersen3 and Meyer2 were the first to describe a subgroup of patients with Perthes disease who showed a distinct radiological and clinical picture found rarely among the clinical conditions affecting the hip joint in childhood. Meyer estimated that this subgroup accounted for 10% of all patients with Perthes disease and was characterized by a male predominance and young age (<5 years). He reported that this dysplasia is noted during the second year of life and usually disappears by the end of the sixth year. It is more often bilateral than typical Perthes disease (42% vs 7%) and has a higher familial frequency of other hip diseases such as congenital dislocation and Perthes disease.2 Meyer traced the pathogenesis to circulatory disturbances that caused delayed, irregular ossification. Other authors have attributed the dysplasia to congenital focal hypoplasia of the femoral epiphysis.4

The possibility that we are dealing with a physiologic variant of ossification of the femoral head cannot be ruled out in those who completely recover with normal epiphysial shape and size.

Radiologically, affected patients show a marked delay in the development of the femoral epiphysial nucleus and its pathological appearance at a later date. Maturation is retarded in other parts of the skeleton as well.1 In Meyer dysplasia, ossification of the femoral head does not usually set in until 2 years of age. The ossification center, instead of the normal single unit, appears as a small epiphysial nucleus composed of multiple independent bony foci. These foci gradually grow, coalesce, and finally fuse into a single center.1 A small, single ossification center with a cortical defect on the articular surface has also been described.4

Magnetic resonance imaging shows multiple centers of ossification of the femoral head, with a normal signal intensity in all sequences and reduced height of the cartilaginous epiphysis.4,5 Normal findings of bone scanning are typical for Meyer dysplasia.6

The differential diagnosis consists mainly of Perthes disease, which is characterized by both abnormal bone scan findings and bone marrow signals in the femoral head on magnetic resonance imaging. Uniform massive condensation on hip radiographs in Perthes disease is another feature that distinguishes it from Meyer dysplasia, and that does not require expensive imaging techniques. However, this finding is usually a late sign and therefore not helpful in the early stages. Whenever bilateral changes are present, multiple epiphysial dysplasia and hypothyroidism should be excluded.7

Despite the prominent radiological findings, clinical signs are usually mild or absent, and the lesions are usually discovered incidentally.1,2 Some patients with bilateral involvement may have a mild inconsistent waddling gait. Pain, limping, or limitation of movement are rarely observed and are usually transient.4

As healing is complete, Meyer dysplasia needs no treatment. Patients show continuous improvement with steady unification and growth of the epiphysis,1 usually over a 3-year period.2 The final outcome is a normal hemispherical shape and size of the femoral head,5 although some have reported diminished height.1,4 Function is probably normal. Nevertheless, biomechanically induced degenerative joint changes may be anticipated in adulthood in those with smaller femoral heads. In Perthes disease, by contrast, the natural course is associated with increased fragmentation that may result in permanent deformity of the femoral head if left untreated.1 However, in children younger than 5 years, the disease is quite benign and usually requires no intervention.

The results of a recent prospective, clinical, and radiological study of 18 children with Meyer dysplasia4 have confirmed most of Meyer's observations. Half the cases were bilateral and boys were affected 5 times more often than girls. The imaging studies showed a delayed appearance of the ossification centers, with complete healing by an average age of 5½ years, except for a slight loss in epiphysial height. Most of the patients were asymptomatic. Although 6 (20%) of Meyer's 30 patients showed a shift from the benign course of dysplasia to Perthes disease,2 no cases of Perthes disease were observed in this study.4 This was also true for another case of bilateral femoral dysplasia, which had a favorable natural course.8

We described 5 patients with Meyer dysplasia, 2 of whom were initially misdiagnosed as having osteomyelitis and 3 of whom were thought to have Perthes disease. The diagnosis of Meyer dysplasia in our patients was confirmed by the normal bone scan findings, normal bone marrow signal on magnetic resonance imaging, and complete resolution of the limping. Since all our patients had been asymptomatic in the past, we assume that the acute onset of limping may have been due to an acute event, such as toxic synovitis, unrelated to Meyer dysplasia. The elevation of the sedimentation rate in patients 1 and 2 may be attributed to an intercurrent infection that resolved without treatment.

Once diagnosed, these patients should be followed up both clinically and radiographically (with plain films) by the pediatric orthopedic surgeon. If there is not clinical deterioration (limping, limited joint movement), hip radiographs should be performed once a year until resolution is noted.

In conclusion, Meyer dysplasia is a rare condition with a benign clinical course that may mimic other, more severe hip diseases. A greater awareness of this condition would prevent unnecessary hospitalization and treatment and allay parental fears regarding the prognosis.

Accepted for publication February 8, 1999.

Editor's Note: Keep this in mind next time you see a limping toddler or preschooler.—Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD

Corresponding author: Liora Harel, MD, Department of Pediatrics C, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tiqva 49202, Israel.

References
1.
Caffey  J Pediatric X-ray Diagnosis.  Chicago, Ill Yearbook Medical Publishers Inc1978;1372- 1375
2.
Meyer  J Dysplasia epiphysealis capitis femoris: a clinical-radiological syndrome and its relationship to Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1964;34183- 197Google ScholarCrossref
3.
Pedersen  EK Dysplasia epiphysealis capitis femoris [abstract].  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1960;42663Google Scholar
4.
Khermosh  OWeintroub  S Dysplasia epiphysealis capitis femoris: Meyer's dysplasia.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73621- 625Google Scholar
5.
Resnick  DSik Kang  H Internal Derangement of Joints.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1997;538
6.
Bensahel  HBok  B Apport de la scintigraphie à la pathologie non infectieuse de la hanche de l'enfant.  Arch Fr Pediatr. 1979;361040- 1045Google Scholar
7.
Spranger  J The epiphyseal dysplasias.  Clin Orthop Related Res. 1976;11446- 58Google Scholar
8.
Emery  LTimmermans  JLeroy  JG Dysplasia epiphysealis capitis femoris? a longitudinal observation.  Eur J Pediatr. 1983;140345- 347Google ScholarCrossref
×