[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Article
May 2008

Antecedents and Sequelae of Sudden Parental Death in Offspring and Surviving Caregivers

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Drs Melhem and Brent and Ms Walker), and the Division of Collaborative Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Montefiore Hospital (Ms Moritz), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(5):403-410. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.5.403
Abstract

Objectives  To examine the psychiatric antecedents that put parents at risk for early death, and the psychological sequelae of bereavement in offspring and caregivers.

Design  A population-based study.

Setting  Bereaved families were recruited through the coroner's records and by advertisement. Control families were recruited by random-digit dialing and advertisement.

Participants  Families with biological offspring from 7 to 25 years of age in which 1 parent died of suicide, accident, or sudden natural death were included (n = 140). Controls (n = 99) had 2 living parents and their biological offspring and had no death of a first-degree relative within the past 2 years.

Main Outcome Measures  Lifetime psychiatric history for deceased parents (probands) and new-onset psychiatric disorders, self-reported symptoms, and functional status in offspring and surviving caregivers.

Results  Bipolar disorder, substance abuse, and personality disorders are more common in probands who died of suicide or accident than in control parents. Bereaved offspring and their caregivers were at increased risk for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder. Bereaved offspring had a 3-fold (95% confidence interval, 1.3-7.0) increased risk of depression, even after controlling for antecedent and concomitant risk factors. Offspring bereaved by suicide showed similar outcomes compared with those bereaved by other types of death.

Conclusions  Bereavement conveys an increased risk of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder above and beyond other vulnerability factors. Better integration of medical and psychiatric care may prevent premature parental death, but once it occurs, physicians should be alert to the increased risk for depression and posttraumatic stress disorder in bereaved offspring and their caregivers.

The death of a parent, which is experienced by 4% of children in Western countries, is consistently rated as one of the most stressful life events that a child can experience.1,2 Retrospective, record linkage, and prospective studies have found enduring psychiatric sequelae in children bereaved after a parent's death.3-17 However, little is known about the range, course, or predictors of psychiatric outcomes in bereaved offspring.

Parents who die suddenly are likely to have higher than expected rates of psychiatric disorder. Mood, alcohol and substance abuse, and personality disorders convey an increased mortality not only from suicide but also from accidents and cardiovascular diseases.18-24 Moreover, the psychiatric factors that increase the risk for parental sudden death may also predispose offspring to adverse outcomes, which then may put bereaved offspring doubly at risk for psychological sequelae.

Although psychiatric illness may increase mortality from a variety of causes, death due to suicide is a direct consequence of mental disorder. It is widely believed that children whose parents died by suicide are at greater risk for adverse outcomes compared with offspring whose parents died of other causes, although the evidence from initial empirical studies is mixed.25-30 These studies have relatively small samples, ascertain subjects through referral, and have not considered the effect of the deceased parent's psychiatric disorder on the bereaved child's subsequent course.

To address these issues and provide more in-depth information about the sequelae of parental death in bereaved offspring, we initiated a controlled, prospective, population-based study of the effect of sudden parental death. In this initial report, we address 4 questions: (1) what psychiatric factors in the deceased parent are associated with suicide, accidental death, and sudden natural death? (2) what are the psychological sequelae of offspring bereaved after the death of a parent? (3) does bereavement make an independent contribution to child outcome after controlling for antecedent and concomitant risk factors? and (4) does parental suicide confer a higher risk of adverse sequelae than loss of a parent due to accidental or sudden natural death?

Methods

Sample

The sample includes 140 families in which 1 parent died. The deceased parents (probands) were aged 30 to 60 years, had biological offspring aged 7 to 25 years, and died within 24 hours of definite verdicts of either suicide (n = 44), accidental death (n = 36), or sudden natural death (n = 60). No ambiguous accidents, such as single-passenger vehicular accidents or deaths by firearms thought to be accidental, were included in the study. To study the effect of parental death alone, accidents in which multiple family members died or were seriously injured were not included, and the accident and sudden natural death groups could not have had a completed suicide among first- or second-degree relatives in the past 2 years. The accidental deaths consisted of 13 drug overdoses, 14 motor vehicle accidents, 4 accidental falls, and 5 others (drowning, exposure to cold, etc). Drug overdoses were carefully reviewed to rule out those with possible suicidal intent. Parents who died of a drug overdose had a much lower rate of previous suicide attempt than did parents who died of suicide (6.7% vs 40.5%, Fisher exact test, P = .02). The causes of sudden natural death were myocardial infarction (n = 48), infections (n = 5), and 12 others (diabetes mellitus, stroke, aneurysm, gastric bypass surgery, etc). Undetermined and ambiguous cases were excluded.

The nonbereaved control group included 99 families, each with 2 living biological parents and offspring living at home in which no first-degree relatives had died within the past 2 years. Control families were recruited by frequency matching to the deceased probands on sex, age, and neighborhood.

The sample of deceased parents and controls was primarily male (184 of 239 or 77.0%), of European origin (203 of 239 or 84.9%), and in their early 40s (133 of 239 or 55.6%), and surviving caregivers were mostly female (195 of 240 or 81.2%) (Table 1). All offspring in this sample were biological offspring of the proband, with a median of 2 offspring per family (interquartile range, 1). Most surviving caregivers (226 [94.0%]) had a parental relationship with the child before the proband's death as biological parents (219 [91.0%]) or as adoptive parents or stepparents (7 [3.0%]). The remainder (14 [5.0%]) were relatives who became caregivers only after the death of the parent.

Table 1. 
Demographic Characteristics of Probands, Caregivers, and Offspring
Demographic Characteristics of Probands, Caregivers, and Offspring

Recruitment and consent procedures

Bereaved families (n=140) were recruited through the coroner's records (65 [46.4%]) and by newspaper advertisement (75 [53.6%]). Probands recruited by these 2 methods were similar on demographic characteristics, but the probands recruited through the coroner's office had higher rates of psychiatric disorder (89% vs 69%; χ21 = 8.2; P = .004), mainly due to a higher rate of alcohol/substance abuse disorders (78% vs 49%; χ21 = 12.2; P < .001). A higher proportion of sudden natural death probands (70%) were recruited by advertisement, because sudden natural deaths frequently do not come to the attention of the coroner. The demographic characteristics of probands who died of suicide and accidents were similar to those of all people who died of suicide and accident in Allegheny County (metropolitan Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), and there were no demographic differences as a function of method of recruitment. The rate of acceptance into the study for eligible bereaved families was 71%.

Control families were frequency matched to deceased parents by neighborhood, age, and sex. Subjects were recruited by random-digit dialing or by advertisement. Of those who were eligible, 55% agreed to participate.

This study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. After a complete description of the study, caregivers' consent was obtained for their participation, as well as that of their offspring. Assent or consent was obtained from offspring, depending on their age. Interviews were conducted at participants' homes or in our offices.

Assessment

Master’s-degree–level interviewers with a background in psychology or social work conducted the interviews after receiving extensive training. Interviews with offspring and caregivers were conducted by separate interviewers blind to their psychiatric status. Interviews were conducted at a median of 9 months (interquartile range, 6) after the proband's death. There was no significant difference in the time from death to study intake by type of death (Kruskal-Wallis test χ22 = 2, P = .38). In addition, time since the death was unrelated to children's symptoms or rates of new-onset disorder. Psychiatric disorder was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) Axis I disorders for offspring 18 years and older and caregivers, or the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version for offspring younger than 18 years.31,32 Personality disorder was assessed in those 18 years and older using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) Axis II disorders.33 For deceased parents, diagnoses were obtained using the above-noted instruments in a psychological autopsy procedure, with the surviving spouse and/or next of kin serving as informants. Previous work has shown this approach to yield reliable and valid diagnoses.34-36 In conjunction with the clinical interview, functional impairment was assessed using the Children’s Global Assessment Scale37 for young offspring or the Global Assessment Scale for young adult offspring and caregivers.38 High interrater reliability was maintained for psychiatric diagnoses and global impairment (κ, 0.74-0.85; intraclass correlation = 0.88).

The Circumstances of Exposure to Death, a semistructured interview developed and tested in a previous study, was used to assess offsprings' experience surrounding and following the death of their parent.35 Complicated grief was assessed using the Inventory of Complicated Grief39 in caregivers. In offspring, a version of the Inventory of Complicated Grief–Revised that consisted of 28 items retained after factor analyses was used.40 A history of abuse, including onset and duration, was obtained using a measure based on the Abuse Dimensions Inventory.41 The severity of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms was assessed by the Child PTSD Symptom Scale Interview42 in children and the parallel PTSD Symptom Scale Interview43 for adults. Socioeconomic status and household income were rated using the Hollingshead scale.44

Self-reported depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation were assessed in offspring using the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders, and the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire–JR, respectively.45-47 Parallel measurements in adults were obtained using the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire.48-50 Intercurrent life events were assessed using the Life Events Checklist51 in offspring younger than 18 years and the shortened Social Readjustment Rating Scale of Holmes and Rahe52 in offspring 18 years and older.53

Factors that might buffer the impact of bereavement were also assessed in offspring. Family cohesion and self-esteem were assessed using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale II54 and the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory self-esteem subscale,55 respectively. Social support and coping style were assessed using the Survey of Children's Social Support56 and Kidcope,57 respectively, in offspring younger than 18 years. These domains were assessed by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support58 and the Ways of Coping questionnaire in offspring 18 years and older.59 When different measures were used for offspring who were younger than 18 years or 18 years and older, scores from these measures were standardized.

Data analysis

The lifetime psychiatric characteristics of probands and previous psychiatric history, current symptoms, and rates of new-onset psychiatric disorder in caregivers and offspring from bereaved families were compared with those of controls using standard univariate statistics. For the analyses of psychiatric characteristics that antedated the death, we included only those caregivers who had a parental role before the death (227 of 240). To control for multiple comparisons in our examination of psychiatric characteristics, we divided α = .05 by the number of contrasts, resulting in corrected values that ranged from .01 to .008. We compared offspring with new-onset diagnoses (depression and PTSD) with those without a new-onset disorder, and then used logistic regression to identify the most salient predictors of new-onset diagnoses and examine the effect of bereavement after controlling for demographic, familial, and clinical risk factors, and tested the roles of sex and age as moderators of the effect of bereavement on child outcome. We also adjusted for the difference in age of the proband between the different groups. Because multiple offspring were recruited per family, a cluster effect was introduced in the regression analyses.

Results

Psychiatric disorders in probands

Probands in the 4 groups—suicide, sudden natural death, accidental death, and controls—were significantly different with respect to bipolar disorder, alcohol/substance abuse, personality disorder, and any disorder (Table 2). As expected, probands who died of suicide had higher rates of bipolar disorder, alcohol/substance abuse disorders, personality disorder, and any disorder than controls. Probands who died of accidental death also had higher rates of alcohol/substance abuse and personality disorders than controls. Though not statistically significant, probands who died of accidental or sudden natural death had higher rates of bipolar disorder than controls that were not significantly lower than in probands who died of suicide. The suicide group was significantly different from the sudden natural death group with regard to rates of alcohol/substance abuse disorders, personality disorder, and any psychiatric disorder.

Table 2. 
Predeath Psychiatric History
Predeath Psychiatric History

Predeath psychiatric disorder in caregivers and offspring

Group differences were found for prior history of depression, anxiety, and any psychiatric disorder in caregivers with a parental role before the proband's death (Table 2). Caregivers in the suicide group were more likely to have had a prior history of depression and any disorder than control parents. Caregivers in both the suicide and sudden natural death groups had higher rates of anxiety disorder than did control parents. Predeath history of any disorder was different across offspring groups, with higher rates in offspring of parents who died of suicide vs controls.

Psychological sequelae of parental bereavement

Group differences were found for any new-onset psychiatric disorder, depression, and PTSD (Table 3). Offspring in the suicide, accident, and natural death groups showed higher rates of new-onset depression than did control offspring. Bereaved offspring were at increased risk for PTSD compared with control offspring (8.6% vs 0%, P < .001); post hoc, offspring in the suicide and natural death groups showed higher rates of new-onset PTSD compared with controls. Offspring in the natural death group were significantly different from the control group in the new onset of any psychiatric disorder. Offspring in the suicide and natural death groups showed more functional impairment than those in the control group. The bereaved groups were similar in their complicated grief scores.

Table 3. 
New-Onset Diagnoses and Symptoms in Offspring
New-Onset Diagnoses and Symptoms in Offspring

Concomitant risk factors

Caregivers in all 3 bereaved groups showed similarly increased rates of new-onset depression and PTSD compared with caregivers in the control group (Table 4). Similarly, higher levels of self-reported depression, anxiety, PTSD, suicidal ideation, and functional impairment were found in the bereaved groups relative to the control group. Similar to offspring, the rates of complicated grief were comparable among caregivers in the 3 bereaved groups. Caregiver and child symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, suicidal ideation, and complicated grief were intercorrelated (r = 0.26-0.48; P < .001).

Table 4. 
New-Onset Diagnoses and Symptoms in Caregivers
New-Onset Diagnoses and Symptoms in Caregivers

Predictors of outcome and independent contribution of bereavement

We examined the correlates of new-onset disorders in depression and PTSD, the 2 conditions that were more prevalent among bereaved offspring (Table 5). We included significant antecedent and concomitant risk factors in regression analyses, as well as sex and age and their interactions with bereavement, to examine whether they moderated the effect of bereavement on outcome. Bereavement conveyed an increased risk for depression (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-7.0) even after controlling for all covariates. In addition, caregiver functioning (higher functioning is protective; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.9-1.0) and offspring self-esteem (higher score reflects poorer self-esteem; OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.2) were also significant predictors (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; χ2 = 10.3; P = .25). No significant interactions were found between bereavement and offspring age or sex. Among bereaved offspring, having a last confiding conversation with the deceased (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.8-12.1) predicted new-onset depression in addition to caregiver's functioning and child's self-esteem. The type of death was not a significant predictor within the bereaved group (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; χ2 = 7.2; P = .52).

Table 5. 
Correlates of New-Onset Depression in Offspring
Correlates of New-Onset Depression in Offspring

Because no PTSD cases were observed in the control group, we examined correlates of new-onset PTSD among bereaved offspring only (Table 6). Logistic regression, including all significant predictors, as well as sex and age and their interactions with type of death, revealed that a previous history of any psychiatric disorder in offspring (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 2.3-38.7), a history of bipolar disorder in the deceased parent (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 1.9-21.9), being at the scene when death occurred (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 1.8-36.1), and a family history of PTSD (OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 1.6-28.5) predicted new-onset of PTSD. Type of death was not a significant predictor of new-onset PTSD. In addition, no significant main effects of sex and age were found, nor any interactions with type of death (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; χ2 = 6.7, P = .35).

Table 6. 
Correlates of New-Onset PTSD in Bereaved Offspring
Correlates of New-Onset PTSD in Bereaved Offspring

Comment

Bereaved offspring are at increased risk for adverse outcome in part due to factors that antedate and may have contributed to their parents' early deaths. This was particularly marked in the suicidal death group compared with the control group, with the former showing much higher rates of bipolar disorder. However, accidental deaths were also more likely to have psychiatric disorders compared with controls, specifically alcohol/substance abuse and personality disorder. We also demonstrate that the loss of a parent conveys an increased risk for new-onset depression and PTSD in their children, even after controlling for antecedent and concomitant risk factors. Finally, we demonstrate that, despite greater loading for antecedent risk factors, bereavement due to suicide does not convey an increased risk for adverse outcome 9 months after the death, compared with other types of sudden death.

Psychiatric disorder in the parent is clearly an antecedent to early parental death. The disorders most closely associated with premature parental death were bipolar disorder, alcohol and substance abuse, and personality disorder. High rates of bipolar disorder are expected in suicide victims, but the accidental and sudden natural death groups also showed a trend toward higher rates of bipolar disorder than the control group. While the association between bipolar disorder and suicide is well known, there are also reports that patients with bipolar disorder have a greater number of cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking and obesity, and an increased risk of pulmonary embolism.18,20-23 Thus, the previously reported association between parental bereavement and bipolar disorder in offspring may be explained in part by a higher rate of bipolar disorder in parents who die prematurely.4,6,8,10 In addition, psychological autopsy studies of traffic accidents show an overrepresentation of substance abuse disorders and personality styles that are termed impulsive and sensation seeking.19,24 These findings highlight the importance of reducing health risk behaviors in individuals with these complex and challenging disorders and providing integrated medical and psychiatric management for these individuals.

Moreover, offspring who lose a parent due to suicide, accident, or sudden natural death are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, not only due to higher incidence of psychiatric disorders among probands but also because of higher rates of disorder in the coparent and the offspring themselves. These findings may be explained by assortative mating, and by the familial transmission of parental disorder to offspring.

Loss of a parent due to sudden death conveys an increased risk of depression and PTSD in bereaved offspring, above and beyond increased antecedent risk. Higher caregiver functioning was protective against depression, which was similar to the results of a previous study by Sandler et al.9 Caregivers had higher rates of disorder before the death and increased risk of depression and PTSD after the death, which in turn affected offspring's outcome. Other factors that affected outcome included the nature of the last conversation with the deceased. A recollection of a supportive conversation with the deceased was associated with a higher risk of depression, which is consistent with other studies finding that the closer the relationship to the deceased, the higher the risk of depression.60 Understanding the mechanisms through which bereavement conveys its effects is essential to identify those at highest risk who should be the target of future prevention and intervention efforts.

At the initial assessment, suicide-bereaved offspring had the greater loading for predeath risk factors. However, their outcome was similar to those of other bereaved youth. This supports a view that, in the short term, there are more similarities than differences among offspring whose parents die of suicide and those who lose a parent to accidental or sudden natural death. Further follow-up is indicated to determine whether these groups begin to diverge over time.

This study has several strengths and limitations. To our knowledge, it is the first controlled, population-based study of the effect of sudden parental death on offspring and has the largest sample of suicide-bereaved offspring. However, it is very difficult to determine whether this sample is representative or not because coroners' records do not routinely list surviving offspring, and because natural deaths usually are not the province of the coroner. However, our sample of suicides and accidents was demographically similar to Allegheny County overall, and our response rate was 71%, which is relatively high for these types of studies. Although it is possible that there were referral biases, because disturbed families more worried about their children might have been more likely to participate, bereaved families recruited by advertisement showed lower rates of some proband disorders, which would argue against such a referral bias. Our profile of the deceased parents is similar to those obtained in previous psychological autopsy studies, which makes it more likely that our results are not simply the result of sampling bias.19,61 A second limitation is the use of an informant rather than self-report in the case of the deceased probands. However, the psychological autopsy procedure is a specific and fairly sensitive method for determining psychiatric disorder,34 and if anything, is likely to underestimate the rate of disorder, thus biasing the results more toward the null hypothesis.36

Our findings have important clinical and public health implications. The best way to attenuate the effect of parental bereavement among offspring is to prevent early death in their parents by improving the detection and treatment of bipolar illness, substance and alcohol abuse, and personality disorders, and by addressing the lifestyle correlates of these illnesses that lead to premature death. The caregiver should be monitored for depression and PTSD, because restoration of functioning is a positive prognosticator for offspring. Given the increased risk of depression and PTSD, bereaved offspring should be monitored and, if needed, referred and treated for their psychiatric disorder. Further studies are needed to examine the course and long-term effect of bereavement on offspring and their surviving caregivers, to test the mechanisms by which parental bereavement exerts these effects, and to identify the subset of bereaved families who may require treatment, which can then frame targets for intervention and prevention efforts.

Correspondence: David A. Brent, MD, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O’Hara St, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (brentda@upmc.edu).

Accepted for Publication: September 20, 2007.

Author Contributions: Dr Brent had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Melhem and Brent. Acquisition of data: Melhem, Walker, Moritz, and Brent. Analysis and interpretation of data: Melhem and Brent. Drafting of the manuscript: Melhem and Brent. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Melhem, Walker, Moritz, and Brent. Statistical analysis: Melhem. Obtained funding: Melhem and Brent. Administrative, technical, or material support: Walker and Moritz. Study supervision: Melhem, Walker, Moritz, and Brent.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grant R01 MH65368 from the National Institute of Mental Health (Dr Brent) and a Young Investigator Award and a Travel Award from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (Dr Melhem).

Role of the Sponsor: The National Institute of Mental Health and the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Previous Presentation: The results of this study were presented at the American Association of Suicidology Annual Conference; April 13, 2007; New Orleans, Louisiana.

Additional Contributions: M. Bertille Donohoe, PsyD, David Rizzo, MSW, and Lisa Fleischer, MEd, LCSW, of the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic acquired data for this study, for which they received compensation. We thank Satish Iyengar, PhD, Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, for formulating the analytic plan for this study, and we thank the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office for providing access to the coroners’ records of suicide, accident, and natural deaths. We also thank the families for their participation.

References
1.
Harrison  LHarrington  R Adolescent bereavement experiences: prevalence, association with depressive symptoms, and use of services.  J Adolesc 2001;24 (2) 159- 169PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Yamamoto  KDavis  ODylak  SWhittaker  JMarsh  Cvan der Westhuizen  P Across six nations: stressful events in the lives of children.  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 1996;26 (3) 139- 149PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Cerel  JFristad  MVerducci  JWeller  RWeller  E Childhood bereavement: psychopathology in the 2 years postparental death.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45 (6) 681- 690PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Tsuchiya  KJAgerbo  EMortensen  PB Parental death and bipolar disorder: a robust association was found in early maternal suicide.  J Affect Disord 2005;86 (2-3) 151- 159PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Abdelnoor  AHollins  S The effect of childhood bereavement on secondary school performance.  Educ Psychol Pract 2004;2043- 54Google Scholar
6.
Kessing  LAgerbo  EMortensen  P Major stressful life events and other risk factors for first admission with mania.  Bipolar Disord 2004;6 (2) 122- 129PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Lin  KSandler  IAyers  TWolchik  SLeucken  L Resilience in parentally bereaved children and adolescents seeking preventive services.  J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2004;33 (4) 673- 683PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Mortensen  PPedersen  CMelbye  MMors  OEwald  H Individual and familial risk factors for bipolar affective disorders in Denmark.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60 (12) 1209- 1215PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Sandler  IAyers  TWolchik  S  et al.  The family bereavement program: efficacy evaluation of a theory-based prevention program for parentally bereaved children and adolescents.  J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71 (3) 587- 600PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Agerbo  ENordentoft  MMortensen  P Familial, psychiatric, and socioeconomic risk factors for suicide in young people: nested case-controlled study.  BMJ 2002;325 (7355) 74PubMed10.1136/bmj.325.7355.74Google Scholar
11.
Kendler  KSheth  KGardner  CPrescott  C Childhood parental loss and risk for first-onset of major depression and alcohol dependence: the time-decay of risk and sex differences.  Psychol Med 2002;32 (7) 1187- 1194PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Rotheram-Borus  MStein  JLin  Y Impact of parent death and an intervention on the adjustment of adolescents whose parents have HIV/AIDS.  J Consult Clin Psychol 2001;69 (5) 763- 773PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Reinherz  HGiaconia  RCarmola Hauf  AWasserman  MSilverman  A Major depression in the transition to adulthood: risks and impairments.  J Abnorm Psychol 1999;108 (3) 500- 510PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Thompson  MKaslow  NKingree  JKing  MBryant  LRey  M Psychological symptomatology following parental death in a predominantly minority sample of children and adolescents.  J Clin Child Psychol 1998;27 (4) 434- 441PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Worden  J Parental death and the adjustment of school-aged children.  Omega J Death Dying 1996;3391- 102Google Scholar
16.
Harris  TBrown  GBifulco  A Loss of parent in childhood and adult psychiatric disorder: the role of lack of adequate parental care.  Psychol Med 1986;16 (3) 641- 659PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Rutter  M Stress, coping, and development: some issues and some questions. Garmezy  NRutter  M Stress, Coping and Development in Children. Baltimore, MD Johns Hopkins University Press1983;1- 41Google Scholar
18.
Osborn  DLevy  GNazareth  IPetersen  IIslam  AKing  M Relative risk of cardiovascular and cancer mortality in people with severe mental illness from the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64 (2) 242- 249PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Dumais  ALesage  ABoyer  R  et al.  Psychiatric risk factors for motor vehicle fatalities in young men.  Can J Psychiatry 2005;50 (13) 838- 844PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Kupfer  DJ The increasing medical burden in bipolar disorder.  JAMA 2005;293 (20) 2528- 2530PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Strudsholm  UJohannessen  LFoldager  LMunk-Jorgensen  P Increased risk for pulmonary embolism in patients with bipolar disorder.  Bipolar Disord 2005;7 (1) 77- 81PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Tsai  SYLee  CHKuo  CJChen  CC A retrospective analysis of risk and protective factors for natural death in bipolar disorder.  J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66 (12) 1586- 1591PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Klumpers  UBoom  KJanssen  FTulen  JLoonen  A Cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with bipolar disorder.  Pharmacopsychiatry 2004;37 (5) 211- 216PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Schmidt  CW  JrShaffer  JZlotowitz  HFisher  R Suicide by vehicular crash.  Am J Psychiatry 1977;134 (2) 175- 178PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Brown  ASandler  ITein  JLiu  XHaine  R Implications of parental suicide and violent death for promotion of resilience of parentally bereaved children.  Death Stud 2007;31 (4) 301- 335PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Sethi  SBhargava  S Child and adolescent survivors of suicide.  Crisis 2003;244- 6PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Pfeffer  CKarus  DSiegel  KJiang  H Child survivors of parental death from cancer or suicide: depressive and behavioral outcomes.  Psychooncology 2000;9 (1) 1- 10PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Cerel  JFristad  MWeller  EWeller  R Suicide-bereaved children and adolescents: a controlled longitudinal examination.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999;38 (6) 672- 679PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Pfeffer  CMartins  PMann  J  et al.  Child survivors of suicide: psychosocial characteristics.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36 (1) 65- 74PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Shepherd  DBarraclough  B The aftermath of parental suicide for children.  Br J Psychiatry 1976;129267- 276PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Spitzer  RLWilliams  JGibbon  MFirst  M The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), I: history, rationale, and description.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49 (8) 624- 629PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Kaufman  JBirmaher  BBrent  D  et al.  Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children–Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36 (7) 980- 988PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
First  MSpitzer  RGibbon  MWilliams  JBenjamin  L Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II), Version 2.0.  New York Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute1994;
34.
Kelly  TMann  J Validity of DSM-III-R diagnosis by psychological autopsy: a comparison with clinician ante-mortem diagnosis.  Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94 (5) 337- 343PubMedGoogle Scholar
35.
Brent  DPerper  JMoritz  G  et al.  The validity of diagnoses obtained through the psychological autopsy procedure in adolescent suicide victims: use of family history.  Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;87 (2) 118- 122PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Brent  DPerper  JKolko  DZelenak  J The psychological autopsy: methodological considerations for the study of adolescent suicide.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1988;27 (3) 362- 366PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Shaffer  DGould  MBrasic  JAmbrosini  PFisher  PBird  HA Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS).  Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40 (11) 1228- 1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Endicott  JSpitzer  RFleiss  JCohen  J The Global Assessment Scale.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976;33 (6) 766- 771PubMedGoogle Scholar
39.
Prigerson  HMaciejewski  PReynolds  C  et al.  Inventory of complicated grief: a scale to measure maladaptive symptoms of loss.  Psychiatry Res 1995;59 (1-2) 65- 79PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Melhem  NMoritz  GWalker  MShear  MBrent  D The phenomenology and correlates of complicated grief in children and adolescents.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;46 (4) 493- 499PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
Chaffin  MWherry  JNewlin  CCrutchfield  ADykman  R The Abuse Dimensions Inventory: initial data on a research measure of abuse severity.  J Interpers Violence 1997;12 (4) 569- 589Google Scholar
42.
Foa  EJohnson  KFeeny  NTreadwell  K The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: a preliminary examination of its psychometric properties.  J Clin Child Psychol 2001;30 (3) 376- 384PubMedGoogle Scholar
43.
Foa  ERiggs  DDancu  CRothbaum  B Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder.  J Trauma Stress 1993;6 (4) 459- 473Google Scholar
44.
Hollingshead  A Four-Factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, CT Yale University1975;
45.
Angold  ACostello  EMesser  SPickles  AWinder  FSilver  D Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents.  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1995;5237- 249Google Scholar
46.
Birmaher  BKhetarpal  SBrent  D  et al.  The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997;36 (4) 545- 553PubMedGoogle Scholar
47.
Reynolds  W Suicidal ideation and depression in adolescents: assessment and research. Lovibond  PWilson  P Clinical and Abnormal Psychology. New York, NY Elsevier1989;125- 135Google Scholar
48.
Beck  AWard  CMendelson  MMock  JErbaugh  J An inventory for measuring depression.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4561- 671PubMedGoogle Scholar
49.
Beck  AEpstein  NBrown  GSteer  R An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties.  J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56 (6) 893- 897PubMedGoogle Scholar
50.
Reynolds  W Psychometric characteristics of the Adult Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire in college students.  J Pers Assess 1991;56 (2) 289- 307PubMedGoogle Scholar
51.
Brand  AJohnson  J Note on reliability of the Life Events Checklist.  Psychol Rep 1982;50 (3) 1274Google Scholar
52.
Holmes  TRahe  R The social readjustment rating scale.  J Psychosom Res 1967;11 (2) 213- 218PubMedGoogle Scholar
53.
Lewinsohn  PRohde  PSeeley  JFischer  S Age and depression: unique and shared effects.  Psychol Aging 1991;6 (2) 247- 260PubMedGoogle Scholar
54.
Olsen  DPortner  JLavee  Y Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES-II). Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press1985;
55.
Weinberger  DA Distress and self-restraint as measures of adjustment across the life span: confirmatory factor analyses in clinical and nonclinical samples.  Psychol Assess 1997;9 (2) 132- 135Google Scholar
56.
Dubow  EUllman  D Assessing social support in elementary school children: the survey of children's social support.  J Clin Child Psychol 1989;18 (1) 52- 64Google Scholar
57.
Spirito  AStark  LWilliams  C Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations.  J Pediatr Psychol 1988;13 (4) 555- 574PubMedGoogle Scholar
58.
Zimet  GDahlem  NZimet  SFarley  G The multidimensional scale of perceived social support.  J Pers Assess 1988;52 (1) 30- 41Google Scholar
59.
Lazarus  R Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.  Psychosom Med 1993;55 (3) 234- 247PubMedGoogle Scholar
60.
Brent  DPerper  JMoritz  G  et al.  Adolescent witnesses to a peer suicide.  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993;32 (6) 1184- 1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
61.
Cavanagh  JCarson  ASharpe  MLawrie  S Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review.  Psychol Med 2003;33 (3) 395- 405PubMedGoogle Scholar
×