[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
January 2003

Association Between Antibiotic Use and Primary Idiopathic Intussusception

Author Affiliations

From the Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Alabama (Drs Spiro and Arnold), Birmingham, and the Department of Epidemiology and International Health, School of Public Health (Dr Barbone), University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr Arnold is currently with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. Dr Barbone is now with the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, DPMSC, Udine University, Udine, Italy.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(1):54-59. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.1.54

Background  Intussusception is the leading cause of intestinal obstruction in young children. Antibiotics are the most frequently prescribed medication in the pediatric population and have common adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract.

Objective  To determine whether a relationship exists between primary idiopathic intussusception and antibiotic drug use.

Design  Case-control study.

Participants  Ninety-three case patients with intussusception and 353 injury controls younger than 4 years who were seen at the emergency department of the Children's Hospital of Alabama between January 1, 1996, and April 30, 2001, were included. Controls were matched to cases by quarter and year of time of diagnosis, age, and sex.

Main Outcome Measures  Odds ratios and 2-sided 95% confidence intervals were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Prevalence of antibiotic use in an age-standardized, representative sample of US children from NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) was used for external comparisons.

Results  Antibiotic use within 48 hours of diagnosis was found in 23 cases (25%) and 33 controls (9%) (odds ratio, 4.15; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-7.92; attributable risk, 18.7%). Antibiotic use among US children according to NHANES III was 10.7%. In cases, the β-lactam class accounted for 78% of all medications used. Cephalosporin use was associated with more than a 20-fold increased risk of intussusception.

Conclusion  An association between antibiotic drug use and intussusception was identified.

INTUSSUSCEPTION IS the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children aged 3 months to 6 years.1 John Hunter2 first described intestinal invagination in the 18th century; however, the exact mechanism is still poorly defined in this age group, and the etiology is suspected to be multifactorial. Viral pathogens such as adenovirus are known to be associated with intestinal lymphoid hyperplasia and intussusception,3 but they cannot explain all cases. Promotility medications and certain chemical substances such as cocaine, laxatives, and organophosphates have been identified as potential agents that may contribute to the development of intussusception.4-6 Inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide, prostaglandins, and cytokines have been demonstrated to increase rates of intussusception by altering gut motility in laboratory mice.7 Antibiotics, the second most widely prescribed medication class in the United States,8 modify gut motility and intestinal flora.9 To our knowledge, no studies to date have implicated antibiotics as a potential cause of intussusception. We conducted a retrospective, hospital-based, case-control study to determine whether an association exists between antibiotic use and primary, idiopathic intussusception in children.


Data collection

Medical records from the emergency department (ED) at the Children's Hospital of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, were the source of information for this study. The pediatric ED has approximately 55 000 child visits per year, serving the primary, secondary, and tertiary care needs of the Birmingham Metropolitan Standard Area and the state of Alabama. This is the only pediatric ED in the Metropolitan Standard Area (US Census 2000 population aged 0-17 years: n = 231 225) and the state (US Census 2000 population aged 0-17 years: n = 1 123 422). Access to medical records was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham on May 8, 2001. Between July 2 and August 31, 2001, the medical records of children registered in the ED between January 1, 1996, and April 30, 2001, were identified via the hospital medical record system data files.

Children eligible to be cases of intussusception were those registered in the ED who were younger than 4 years at the time of diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 560.00). Patients with pathologic lead points listed as a secondary diagnosis and those whose medical records could not be found were excluded from the study. Controls were identified among children registered in the ED and discharged with a diagnosis of unintentional injury (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes 800-994.10). Eligible controls were matched with cases by calendar year and quarter, age (in years), and sex. Four controls per case were selected within each set defined by year and quarter, age, and sex. If more than 4 controls per case were available per set, the first 4 medical records randomly pulled for abstraction were selected. No relaxation in the matching criteria was allowed when fewer than 4 controls per case were available.

For cases and controls, the following information was collected using a standardized data collection form: medical record number, date of abstraction, discharge date, date of birth, age (in years), sex, race, insurance type, chronic underlying condition(s) (yes or no), history of prematurity, allergies to medicines, patient hospitalization occurrence, immunization status (current or not current), medications used (yes or no), and a list of all current or recent medications recorded. For antibiotic use, if the medication was not listed as current, information on date of discontinuation before the date of ED registration was recorded, and an indication for treatment also was abstracted from the medical records. Generic and proprietary names of medications were identified and classified by one of us (D.M.S.) according to the National Drug Code Data Files of the Food and Drug Administration. Antibiotic indications were collected (otitis media, upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, and other), and "other" was defined if available from the ED record. Gastrointestinal (GI) medications were defined as antiemetics, intestinal promotility agents, H2-receptor antagonists, antacids, and antiflatulents. Gastrointestinal indications were categorized as gastroesophageal reflux, diarrhea, emesis, or other. Gastrointestinal medications were defined as medications whose primary purpose is to modulate clinical effects regarding the GI system. For case patients only, the method of intussusception diagnosis was recorded (clinical suggestion, surgical, radiographic, or unknown), and the anatomic location of the intussusception was identified if known.

Statistical analyses

Analyses were conducted considering use of antibiotics (yes or no) or use of a specific antibiotic class as the dependent variable. The odds ratio (OR) was calculated to estimate the relative risk (RR) of disease among users of antibiotics compared with nonusers. Conditional maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression procedures were used to calculate ORs and 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relation between primary idiopathic intussusception and antibiotic drug use was evaluated also taking into consideration possible confounding variables. However, terms for variables other than use of antibiotics and GI medications did not affect the results and therefore were not kept in the final models. In addition, the study did not have enough power to test the possible interaction between use of antibiotics and other variables. To estimate the proportion of intussusception cases attributable to antibiotic use, attributable risk was calculated as [(E/D) × (RR − 1)]/RR, where E is the number of cases who used antibiotics and D is the total number of cases. Again, RR was estimated using an OR obtained from a conditional logistic regression model adjusted for use of GI medications.

An external comparison was conducted regarding antibiotic use prevalence between our cases and controls and a representative sample of American children aged 2 months to 4 years from NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey).10 This survey was conducted by the US National Center for Health Statistics between 1988 and 1994, and its data can be downloaded from the Internet at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhanes/nh3data.htm. Data from NHANES III (1988-1994) can be used to obtain estimates of prescription drug use in the civilian noninstitutionalized US population. Prescription drug data were obtained by trained interviewers who inventoried all prescription drugs used within 1 month by survey participants 2 months and older. This information can be grouped by age, sex, race or ethnicity, and other factors of interest. For this study, we analyzed NHANES III data to estimate age-standardized rates of use of medications according to the distribution of our case patients in months. Antibiotic drug use in the United States during the month before interview can be estimated from NHANES III using established weights. For comparability purposes, antibiotic use calculated in the United States during the previous 2 weeks was approximately equal to half the prevalence in the previous month.



A total of 111 intussusception ED cases were identified. Of these, 13 (12%) were excluded on the basis of being older than 4 years and 4 (4%) because their medical records were not found. Nine patients were excluded with lead points as a secondary diagnosis, most (8 of 9) being older than the child's fourth birthday. Thus, 93 cases (84%) were included in the study. In 3 (5%) of 60 sets defined by the matching variables, a control-case ratio of less than 4 was obtained owing to lack of available medical records for the eligible controls. This led to the inclusion of 353 controls in the study.

Most children (n = 56) diagnosed as having intussusception were younger than 1 year (Table 1). The male-female ratio was 2.39:1. Cases and controls had similar insurance coverage (Medicaid vs private insurance). Intussusception diagnosis was primarily radiographic (n = 59), and 70 children (75%) were diagnosed as having ileocolic or ileocecal intussusception. In addition, cases and controls were similar in age (13.6 vs 13.4 months).

Table 1. 
Characteristics of Intussusception Case Patients and Injury Controls
Characteristics of Intussusception Case Patients and Injury Controls

Medication analyses

Table 2 describes the association between intussusception and use and type of medications. Antibiotics, antipyretics and analgesics, asthma medications, GI medications, immunizations, over-the-counter cold and cough medications, and seizure medications accounted for 97% of the medications listed for cases and 99% for controls. A total of 60 antibiotics were used by 23 cases (25%) and 33 controls (9%) (adjusted OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.17-7.92). Amoxicillin was the most commonly used medication (9 cases and 16 controls), followed by ceftriaxone sodium (4 cases and 1 control) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2 cases and 3 controls). Gastrointestinal medications were the second most common medications in cases (adjusted OR, 9.51; 95% CI, 3.91-23.12). There were 25 children (16 cases and 9 controls) taking a total of 31 GI medications at the time of ED presentation. Ranitidine (3 cases and 5 controls), promethazine hydrochloride (4 cases), cisapride (3 controls), aluminum hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide and simethicone (2 cases and 1 control), and simethicone (3 cases) were the most common GI medications listed from a total of 11 GI medications identified. Antipyretics and analgesics, asthma medications, over-the-counter cold and cough medicines, and seizure medications all had ORs that were lowered after adjustment and that were not statistically significant. Most antibiotic use for cases (21 of 23) and controls (31 of 33) was recorded as occurring at the time of ED presentation. Each group had 2 patients not currently taking antibiotics, having discontinued using these medications within 48 hours of ED visitation. Therefore, neither group had discontinued any listed antibiotics more than 48 hours before ED presentation.

Table 2. 
Distribution of Medications Used by Intussusception Cases and Injury Controls
Distribution of Medications Used by Intussusception Cases and Injury Controls

Table 3 represents the relation between intussusception and use of antibiotics by class using adjusted ORs. Classes were not mutually exclusive owing to a few class combination products (eg, erythromycin and sulfisoxazole). The β-lactam medication class, including penicillins and cephalosporins, was the most commonly used subclass for cases and controls. The risk of intussusception was more than 20-fold higher among users of cephalosporins (OR, 22.49; 95% CI, 5.32-95.00). A significantly increased risk was also found for penicillins (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.35-7.26).

Table 3. 
Association Between Intussusception and Use of Antimicrobials by Class
Association Between Intussusception and Use of Antimicrobials by Class

Otitis media was the most common indication for antibiotic drug use in cases and controls, composing 52% and 61% of all types of indications, respectively. The next most common indication for antibiotic use was upper respiratory tract infection, accounting for 17% and 9% of the cases and controls, respectively. The association between antibiotic use and intussusception varied little regarding indication, with similar ORs for otitis media, upper respiratory tract infection, and other indications. Other indications listed were fever (1 case), urinary tract reflux (1 case), postlaceration repair (1 case), sickle cell prophylaxis (1 control), and stomach virus (1 control). For GI indications, emesis (10 cases) and gastroesophageal reflux (2 cases and 8 controls) each accounted for 40% of all indication types. Diarrhea (1 case and 1 control) accounted for 8% of all GI indications, and "other" (3 cases) accounted for the remaining 12%.

For the group of children younger than 4 years presenting to the ED with primary idiopathic intussusception, the risk attributable to antibiotic use was 18.7%. This estimate was based on a RR of 4.15 and a proportion of antibiotic users of 0.247 (23/93). From NHANES III, antibiotic use among American children during the 2 weeks before interview was approximately 10.7%, which is similar to that of the study control group. Use of β-lactam antibiotics from the NHANES III external analysis was 8.3%. Therefore, use of antibiotics in our series of intussusception cases was 2.3 times higher compared with the age-standardized NHANES III data.


Previous case series have evaluated the descriptive epidemiologic characteristics of intussusception.11-13 The findings of the intussusception cases in our study are similar to those of previous studies14,15 with respect to age and sex. Although some studies16,17 have reported little seasonal variation, most18,19 have reported peaks during the spring and early summer, which is consistent with our data showing a slight increase in the second quarter (April-June). We noted no significant differences between cases and controls regarding chronic underlying conditions, immunization status, insurance type, history of prematurity, allergies to medications, or mean age (in months).

This study found an independent association of intussusception with antibiotic use. The association of antibiotics with intussusception became somewhat stronger when the OR was adjusted for use of GI medications, indicating that the association cannot be explained by confounding by use of GI medications. The strong association of GI medications with intussusception was expected, considering the presenting clinical symptoms of abdominal pain and emesis that occur with significant frequency before proper diagnosis.1 We also directly analyzed the indication for antibiotic use before ED admission as it was abstracted from the medical records. No indications for antibiotic use were for GI symptoms or diagnosis; in fact, most were otitis media and upper respiratory tract infection related. These results provide further evidence that antibiotic use preceded intussusception and are consistent with national data indicating that acute otitis media and upper respiratory tract infections are the principal diagnoses for US physician visits.8

Of the various antibiotic classes, the β-lactams were found in this study to be significantly associated with intussusception. Users of cephalosporins had more than a 20-fold increased risk of intussusception (OR, 22.49; 95% CI, 5.32-95.00), and use of penicillins also was associated with a significantly higher OR (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.35-7.26). The use of antibiotics has been described previously to cause small-bowel disturbances. Caron et al20 demonstrated in humans that amoxicillin–clavulanate potassium increases the amplitude and duration of duodenal-jejunal contractions. β-Lactams interact directly with the postsynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid receptors in the central nervous system,21 with such receptors additionally found in the mesenteric plexus.22 A potential mechanism of β-lactam class small intestine dysmotility may then be γ-aminobutyric acid, induced either directly or indirectly with administration of this drug class. Erythromycin, a macrolide class antibiotic, is a known motilin receptor agonist and inducer of the migrating motor complex in the human GI tract,23,24 which as a promotility agent is a potential mechanism to induce intussusception. Our hypothetical model, therefore, suggests antibiotic dysmotility as a variable factor in the development of intussusception. The exposure window of all antibiotics recorded was taken currently or within 48 hours of ED presentation. As the half-life of the various antibiotics in our series ranges from 30 minutes to 68 hours,25 it is possible that the antibiotic dysmotility effects may have lasted from hours to days depending on the specific antibiotic used.

The major limitation of this study is the retrospective nature of medical record analysis. Handwritten medical record information is potentially not accurate, poorly interpretable, or noninclusive. Emergency department records reviewed during the study were noncomputerized and were not dictated. The data abstractor was not masked to the study design or hypothesis. To improve the accuracy of results and minimize inconsistencies of record review, the following procedures were used: the abstractor was trained before study inception; explicit protocol were used to describe the criteria for case selection and exclusion; standardized abstraction forms for cases and controls were applied; periodic meetings were held during study abstraction to review and monitor coding protocols; and a second reviewer was used to randomly reabstract 10% of all medical records and data entries to determine interrater reliability for each abstraction step. Interrater variability was low (6.1% for medical record abstraction and 0.4% for data entry). Another potential bias may be the differing nature of information obtained between cases and controls. Intussusception records may have been more complete with respect to recording antibiotic use compared with injury control records, as many of these children were preoperative during the ED course. In addition, all recorded medication use was abstracted with standardized ED records for cases and controls, which may minimize this potential bias.

Outpatient injuries were selected as controls particularly to determine the prevalence of antibiotic use in the general population at the time of matched case diagnosis. We believe that outpatient injuries are the hospital-based series that best represents the general population of children in our area. In addition, potential confounders such as insurance type and chronic conditions were tested in multiple logistic regression models but were found not to affect the association between intussusception and antibiotic use. A second strength was the use of NHANES III data as an external comparison group. Although the NHANES III analysis pertains to a different period (1988-1994 vs 1996-2001) and population (United States vs Alabama), and estimates of use of medication in NHANES III was based on a calculated use during the 2 weeks before interview compared with current use in our study subjects, the concordance of antibiotic use between NHANES III data and our control series provides external validation to our results.

Intussusception as an entity diagnosis has many etiologies. In older children and adults, a pathologic, well-defined lead point is usually discovered, such as lymphoma, Meckel's diverticulum, or intestinal polyposis.1 In the infant and toddler age groups, multiple viral infections have been implicated as these agents have been recovered from intestinal lymphoid tissue at the site of intussusception.26 Adenovirus has been found in up to 50% of intussusception appendixes, significantly higher than in control populations.27 Lymphoid hyperplasia may be responsible for the actual lead point in primary idiopathic intussusception, but this does not explain why some infants develop the condition and others do not despite exposure to similar environmental conditions, including potentially causative viral agents. In addition, it has been suggested that anatomic or genetic predisposition may play an important role, as siblings of patients with intussusception have a reported 15- to 20-fold increase in incidence compared with the general population.17

Prompted by a frequent history of mild upper respiratory tract symptoms preceding the development of intussusception, physicians suggested a potential role for infection decades before the identification of adenovirus.11 In the United States, pediatricians and family physicians commonly prescribe antibiotics for viral conditions in children28 despite consistent evidence that antimicrobial therapy has no role in their treatment. Therefore, one explanation for the antibiotic-intussusception association that we found may not be causality but confounding by viral infection. Conversely, antibiotics are known to alter gut motility,9 and, under certain conditions, these drug-induced changes may contribute to the development of intussusception. Antibiotics have been implicated in other GI pathophysiologic states, such as hemolytic uremic syndrome,29 irritable bowel syndrome,30 and a more recently described relationship between infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and erythromycin therapy.31

We hypothesize that intussusception is a multivariate process that, in young children, may involve a complex interdependent progression of lymphoid hyperplasia combined with dysmotility, induced by the viral agent itself, the use of antibiotics, or other as yet unidentified factors, all or some of which may include the release of local inflammatory mediators. According to a mouse model for intussusception developed by Nissan et al,7 intraperitoneal injections of lipopolysaccharides may interact with other potent inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide, ultimately increasing rates of intussusception above baseline. Therefore, the process of intussusception development is most likely a dynamic entity and may involve a series of cellular and intracellular events for intestinal invagination to occur, with an increased likelihood in individuals with an anatomic or familial predisposition.16 Although the exact cellular and biochemical mechanisms are not clearly defined, antibiotic therapy, viral processes, or both may contribute individually or by additive effect to induce intussusception. Although this study found an independent association between antibiotic use and intussusception, further research is necessary to determine causality.


Corresponding author and reprints: David M. Spiro, MD, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Alabama, 1600 Seventh Ave S, Birmingham, AL 35233 (e-mail: dspiro@peds.uab.edu).

Accepted for publication August 6, 2002.

This study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Short Term Student Training in Health Professional Schools grant T35-HL07473 from the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine.

This study was presented in part at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, Baltimore, Md, May 4, 2002.

We thank the medical records department at the Children's Hospital of Alabama for their tremendous support during the study; Carden Johnston, MD, Pete Glaeser, MD, and Kathy Monroe, MD, for their careful review of the manuscript; and Cathryn Powers, BS, for her diligent work in medical abstraction.

What This Study Adds

There are few known risk factors for primary idiopathic intussusception, which is the leading cause of intestinal obstruction during the first years of life. Antibiotics are widely prescribed and as a medication class have known effects on the gastrointestinal tract. This study was conducted to determine whether a relationship exists between antibiotic drug use and intussusception.

This is the first known study providing evidence of an association between antibiotic use and intussusception. Results of this study suggest that antibiotic medication use may be identified as a potential contributory risk factor when the clinician suspects intussusception. These findings should reinforce the need for judicious use of antibiotic therapy when caring for young children.

Wyllie  RBehrman  REedKliegman  RM,edJenson  HBed Intussusception.  Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 16th ed Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co2000;1142- 1143Google Scholar
Hunter  J On introsusception.  Trans Soc Improvement Med Chirurg Knowledge. 1793;1103- 118Google Scholar
Montgomery  EAPopek  EJ Intussusception, adenovirus, and children: a brief reaffirmation.  Hum Pathol. 1994;25169- 174Google ScholarCrossref
Ottolini  MCFoster  KE Intussusception in association with childhood cocaine intoxication: a case report.  Pediatr Emerg Care. 1994;10342- 343Google ScholarCrossref
Kozlik  TJ Idiopathic multiple ileo-ileal intussusceptions in children: cause? prevention?  Am J Proc Gastroenterol Colon Rectal Surg. 1984;353- 4Google Scholar
Crispen  CKempf  JGreydanus  DEHopkins  JM Intussusception as a possible complication of organophosphate overdose and/or treatment.  Clin Pediatr. 1985;24140Google ScholarCrossref
Nissan  AZhang  JMLin  ZHaskel  YFreund  HRHenani  M The contribution of inflammatory mediators and nitric oxide to lipopolysaccharide-induced intussusception in mice.  J Surg Res. 1997;69205- 207Google ScholarCrossref
Schappert  SM Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 1995.  Vital Health Stat 13. 1997;(129)1- 38Google Scholar
Borriello  SP Possible mechanisms of action of antimicrobial agent–associated gastrointestinal symptoms.  Postgrad Med J. 1992;68(suppl 3)S38- S42Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, NHANES III Household Youth Data File: Public Use Data File Documentation Number 77550.  Hyattsville, Md Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1996;
Gross  REWare  PF Intussusception in childhood.  N Engl J Med. 1948;18645- 652Google ScholarCrossref
Simon  RAHugh  TJCurtin  AM Childhood intussusception in a regional hospital.  Aust N Z J Surg. 1994;64699- 702Google ScholarCrossref
Mayell  MJ Intussusception in infancy and childhood in southern Africa: a review of 223 cases.  Arch Dis Child. 1972;4720- 25Google ScholarCrossref
Kupperman  NO'Dea  TPinckney  LHoecker  C Predictors of intussusception in young children.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154250- 255Google ScholarCrossref
Stringer  MDPablot  SMBrereton  RJ Paediatric intussusception.  Br J Surg. 1992;79867- 876Google ScholarCrossref
Steyn  JKyle  J Epidemiology of acute intussusception.  BMJ. 1961;11730- 1732Google ScholarCrossref
MacMahon  B Data on the etiology of acute intussusception in childhood.  Am J Hum Genet. 1955;7430- 437Google Scholar
Bjarnason  GPettersson  G The treatment of intussusception: thirty years' experience at Gothenburg's Children's Hospital.  J Pediatr Surg. 1968;319- 23Google ScholarCrossref
Ein  SHStephens  CA Intussusception: 354 cases in 10 years.  J Pediatr Surg. 1971;616- 27Google ScholarCrossref
Caron  FDucrotte  PLerebours  EColin  RHumbert  GDenis  P Effects of amoxicillin-clavulanate combination on the motility of the small intestine in human beings.  Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;351085- 1088Google ScholarCrossref
Williams  PDBennett  DBComereski  CR Animal model for evaluating the convulsive liability of β-lactam antibiotics.  Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32758- 760Google ScholarCrossref
Wood  JDJohnson  LR, eded Physiology of the enteric nervous system.  Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. 2nd ed New York, NY Raven Press1987;67- 105Google Scholar
Weber  FHRichards  RDMcCallum  RW Erythromycin: a motilin agonist and gastrointestinal prokinetic agent.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88485- 490Google Scholar
Tomomasa  TKuroume  TArai  HWakabayashi  KItoh  Z Erythromycin induces migrating motor complex in human gastrointestinal tract.  Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31157- 161Google ScholarCrossref
Gilbert  DNedMoellering  RCedSande  MAed The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2002. 32nd ed. Hyde Park, Vt Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc2002;
Bell  TMSteyn  JH Viruses in lymph nodes of children with mesenteric adenitis and intussusception.  BMJ. 1962;2700- 702Google ScholarCrossref
Porter  HJPadfield  CJHPeres  LCHirschowitz  LBerry  PJ Adenovirus and intranuclear inclusions in appendices in intussusception.  J Clin Pathol. 1993;46154- 158Google ScholarCrossref
Schwartz  RHFreij  BJZiai  MSheridan  MJ Antimicrobial prescribing for acute purulent rhinitis in children: a survey of pediatricians and family practitioners.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997;16185- 190Google ScholarCrossref
Wong  CSJelacic  SWatkins  SLTarr  PI The risk of the hemolytic-uremic syndrome after antibiotic treatment of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infections.  N Engl J Med. 2000;3421930- 1936Google ScholarCrossref
Mendall  MAKumar  D Antibiotic use, childhood affluence and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;1059- 62Google ScholarCrossref
Honein  MAPaulozzi  LJHimelright  IM  et al.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis after pertussis prophylaxis with erythromycin: a case review and cohort study.  Lancet. 1999;3542101- 2105Google ScholarCrossref