Benefits of a School-Based Asthma Treatment Program in the Absence of Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial | Asthma | JAMA Pediatrics | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.204.227.34. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Article
May 2004

Benefits of a School-Based Asthma Treatment Program in the Absence of Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry and the Strong Children's Research Center, Rochester, NY (Drs Halterman, Szilagyi, Kaczorowski, Holzhauer, and McConnochie, Mss Conn and Neely, and Mr Callahan); the School of Nursing, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (Dr Yoos); and the Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Dr Lauver).

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(5):460-467. doi:10.1001/archpedi.158.5.460
Abstract

Background  Daily maintenance medications are recommended for all children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma; however, poor adherence to these medications is common.

Objective  To evaluate the impact of school-based provision of inhaled corticosteroids on asthma severity among urban children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma.

Design  Children aged 3 to 7 years with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma were identified at the start of the 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 school years in Rochester. Children were assigned randomly to a school-based care group (daily inhaled corticosteroids provided through the school) or a usual-care group (inhaled corticosteroids not given through school).

Main Outcome Measure  Improvement in parent-reported symptom-free days.

Results  Of 242 eligible children, 184 were enrolled from 54 urban schools. Data for 180 children were available. Parents of children in the school-based care group had a greater improvement in quality of life compared with parents of children in the usual-care group (change score, 0.63 vs 0.24; P = .047); also, children in the school-based care group vs the usual-care group missed less school because of asthma (mean total days missed, 6.8 vs 8.8; P = .047) and experienced more symptom-free days during the early winter months (mean days per 2-week period, 9.2 vs 7.3; P = .02). A post hoc analysis revealed that all significant findings were produced by differences among children who were not exposed to secondhand smoke. Furthermore, among children not exposed to smoke, those in the school-based care group vs the usual-care group had more symptom-free days overall (11.5 vs 10.5; P = .046), had fewer days needing rescue medications (1.6 vs 2.3; P = .03), and were less likely to have had 3 or more acute visits for asthma (6 [13%] of 47 children vs 17 [31%] of 54 children; P = .03).

Conclusions  School-based provision of inhaled corticosteroids significantly improved symptoms, quality of life, and absenteeism among urban children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma. This effect was seen only among children not exposed to secondhand smoke.

×